Multiple range imaging camera operation with minimal performance impact

Time-of-flight range imaging cameras operate by illuminating a scene with amplitude modulated light and measuring the phase shift of the modulation envelope between the emitted and reflected light. Object distance can then be calculated from this phase measurement. This approach does not work in multiple camera environments as the measured phase is corrupted by the illumination from other cameras. To minimize inaccuracies in multiple camera environments, replacing the traditional cyclic modulation with pseudo-noise amplitude modulation has been previously demonstrated. However, this technique effectively reduced the modulation frequency, therefore decreasing the distance measurement precision (which has a proportional relationship with the modulation frequency). A new modulation scheme using maximum length pseudo-random sequences binary phase encoded onto the existing cyclic amplitude modulation, is presented. The effective modulation frequency therefore remains unchanged, providing range measurements with high precision. The effectiveness of the new modulation scheme was verified using a custom time-of-flight camera based on the PMD19-K2 range imaging sensor. The new pseudo-noise modulation has no significant performance decrease in a single camera environment. In a two camera environment, the precision is only reduced by the increased photon shot noise from the second illumination source.

[1]  Roger L. Peterson,et al.  Introduction to Spread Spectrum Communications , 1995 .

[2]  Michael J. Cree,et al.  Characterization of modulated time-of-flight range image sensors , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Peter Seitz,et al.  Robust Optical Time-of-Flight Range Imaging Based on Smart Pixel Structures , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[4]  Stefan May,et al.  3D time-of-flight cameras for mobile robotics , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Timo Kahlmann,et al.  CALIBRATION FOR INCREASED ACCURACY OF THE RANGE IMAGING CAMERA SWISSRANGER , 2006 .

[6]  H. Aanaes,et al.  Environmental Effects on Measurement Uncertainties of Time-of-Flight Cameras , 2007, 2007 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Michael Lehmann,et al.  An all-solid-state optical range camera for 3D real-time imaging with sub-centimeter depth resolution (SwissRanger) , 2004, SPIE Optical Systems Design.

[8]  Peter Seitz,et al.  Pseudonoise Optical Modulation for Real-Time 3-D Imaging With Minimum Interference , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[9]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  Global positioning system : theory and applications , 1996 .

[10]  Thierry Oggier,et al.  CCD / CMOS Lock-In Pixel for Range Imaging : Challenges , Limitations and State-ofthe-Art , 2005 .

[11]  M.B. Pursley,et al.  Crosscorrelation properties of pseudorandom and related sequences , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.