Why the Lg phase does not traverse oceanic crust

It has long been recognized that Lg waves are not observed on paths traversing oceanic crust, but this has not yet been fully explained. Using normal- mode analysis and finite-difference simulations, we demonstrate that (1) the overall thickness of the crustal wave guide affects the number of normal modes in a given frequency range; in general, thinner crust accommodates fewer modes; (2) 6-km- thick oceanic crust does not allow Lg to develop as a significant phase in the frequency band 0.3 to 2 Hz because of the limited number of modes that exist; (3) in continental crust thicker than 15 km, there are usually sufficient modes that Lg is stable; (4) the shallow sediment layer plays important roles in crustal-guided wave propagation, trapping energy near the surface, separating Lg and Rg waves; (5) a 100-km-long segment of oceanic structure on a mixed ocean/continent path can block P-SV type Lg propagation. The primary reason why Lg does not travel through oceanic crust thus lies in the structure of the crustal wave guide, with the decisive factor being the crustal thickness. The detailed shape of ocean-to-continent crustal transitions can influence Lg blockage, but the general inefficiency of Lg propagation in the oceanic structure is the dominant effect.

[1]  R. A. Wagner,et al.  A comparison of regional phases from underground nuclear explosions at east Kazakh and Nevada test sites , 1992 .

[2]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[3]  T. Lay,et al.  The Excitation of Lg Waves by Explosions: A Finite-Difference Investigation , 1994 .

[4]  O. Nuttli,et al.  Yield estimates of nevada test site explosions obtained from seismic Lg waves , 1986 .

[5]  E. Maeland On the evaluation of explicit 2-D extrapolation operators , 1994 .

[6]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Multivariate analysis of waveguide effects on short-period regional wave propagation in Eurasia and its application in seismic discrimination , 1994 .

[7]  F. N. Frenkiel,et al.  Waves In Layered Media , 1960 .

[8]  W. M. Ewing,et al.  Elastic Waves in Layered Media , 2015 .

[9]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  A comparison of synthetic seismograms , 1985 .

[10]  M. Campillo Propagation and attenuation characteristics of the crustal phaseLg , 1990 .

[11]  J. Regan,et al.  Numerical modelling of SH L_g waves in and near continentalmargins , 1989 .

[12]  B. Kennett,et al.  The effect of 3-D structure on Lg propagation patterns , 1990 .

[13]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Interpretation of Lg , 1973 .

[14]  Thorne Lay,et al.  Analysis of short-period regional phase path effects associated with topography in Eurasia , 1994 .

[15]  L. Knopoff,et al.  A search for the oceanic Lg phase , 1979 .

[16]  J. Regan,et al.  Seismic representation theorem coupling: synthetic SH mode sum seismograms for non-homogeneous paths , 1989 .

[17]  R. Gibson,et al.  Crustal wave propagation anomaly across the Pyrenean Range. Comparison between observations and numerical simulations , 1993 .

[18]  G. Panza,et al.  Lg, Li and Rg from Rayleigh Modes , 1975 .

[19]  T. Lay,et al.  Effects of crustal structure under the Barents and Kara Seas on short-period regional wave propagation for Novaya Zemlya explosions: Empirical relations , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  D. Marcuse Theory of dielectric optical waveguides , 1974 .

[21]  V. Maupin Numerical modelling of Lg wave propagation across the North Sea Central Graben , 1989 .

[22]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Higher mode surface waves and their bearing on the structure of the earth's mantle , 1964 .

[23]  M. Bouchon,et al.  Attenuation of crustal waves across the Alpine Range , 1993 .

[24]  Maurice Ewing,et al.  Two slow surface waves across North America , 1952 .

[25]  R. Gibson,et al.  Numerical simulation of high- and low-frequency Lg-wave propagation , 1994 .

[26]  E. E. Larson,et al.  Putnam's Geology , 1978 .

[27]  B. Kennett Lg waves and structural boundaries , 1986 .

[28]  S. Taylor The continental crust , 1985 .