A hybrid agent-based model of the developing mammary terminal end bud.

Mammary gland ductal elongation is spearheaded by terminal end buds (TEBs), where populations of highly proliferative cells are maintained throughout post-pubertal organogenesis in virgin mice until the mammary fat pad is filled by a mature ductal tree. We have developed a hybrid multiscale agent-based model to study how cellular differentiation pathways, cellular proliferation capacity, and endocrine and paracrine signaling play a role during development of the mammary gland. A simplified cellular phenotypic hierarchy that includes stem, progenitor, and fully differentiated cells within the TEB was implemented. Model analysis finds that mammary gland development was highly sensitive to proliferation events within the TEB, with progenitors likely undergoing 2-3 proliferation cycles before transitioning to a non-proliferative phenotype, and this result is in agreement with our previous experimental work. Endocrine and paracrine signaling were found to provide reliable ductal elongation rate regulation, while variations in the probability a new daughter cell will be of a proliferative phenotype were seen to have minimal effects on ductal elongation rates. Moreover, the distribution of cellular phenotypes within the TEB was highly heterogeneous, demonstrating significant allowable plasticity in possible phenotypic distributions while maintaining biologically relevant growth behavior. Finally, simulation results indicate ductal elongation rates due to cellular proliferation within the TEB may have a greater sensitivity to upstream endocrine signaling than endothelial to stromal paracrine signaling within the TEB. This model provides a useful tool to gain quantitative insights into cellular population dynamics and the effects of endocrine and paracrine signaling within the pubertal terminal end bud.

[1]  Alexander R. A. Anderson,et al.  Single-Cell-Based Models in Biology and Medicine , 2007 .

[2]  B. Gusterson,et al.  Human Breast Development , 2004, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[3]  Yongzhi Xu,et al.  Some inverse problems raised from a mathematical model of ductal carcinoma in situ , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[4]  J. Visvader,et al.  The unmasking of novel unipotent stem cells in the mammary gland , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[5]  K. Ravichandran,et al.  Clearing the dead: apoptotic cell sensing, recognition, engulfment, and digestion. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[6]  G H Smith,et al.  Three division-competent, structurally-distinct cell populations contribute to murine mammary epithelial renewal. , 1997, Tissue & cell.

[7]  Y. Tsujimoto,et al.  Induction of apoptosis as well as necrosis by hypoxia and predominant prevention of apoptosis by Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL. , 1996, Cancer research.

[8]  G. Dontu,et al.  Breast cancer, stem/progenitor cells and the estrogen receptor , 2004, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[9]  Y. Jan,et al.  Mammalian Par3 Regulates Progenitor Cell Asymmetric Division via Notch Signaling in the Developing Neocortex , 2009, Neuron.

[10]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Diffusion of epidermal growth factor in rat brain extracellular space measured by integrative optical imaging. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Derek C. Radisky,et al.  Lattice-Based Model of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Suggests Rules for Breast Cancer Progression to an Invasive State , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Cathrin Brisken,et al.  Amphiregulin is an essential mediator of estrogen receptor α function in mammary gland development , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  David C. Lee,et al.  Targeted inactivation of the EGF and amphiregulin genes reveals distinct roles for EGF receptor ligands in mouse mammary gland development. , 1999, Development.

[14]  L. Cantley,et al.  Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation , 2009, Science.

[15]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Patient-calibrated agent-based modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): from microscopic measurements to macroscopic predictions of clinical progression. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  J. D. B. MACDOUGALL,et al.  Diffusion Coefficient of Oxygen through Tissues , 1967, Nature.

[17]  J. Rosen,et al.  Estrogen regulation of mammary gland development and breast cancer: amphiregulin takes center stage , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[18]  Z. Werb,et al.  Mammary ductal morphogenesis requires paracrine activation of stromal EGFR via ADAM17-dependent shedding of epithelial amphiregulin , 2005, Development.

[19]  J C Reed,et al.  Apoptosis in the terminal endbud of the murine mammary gland: a mechanism of ductal morphogenesis. , 1996, Development.

[20]  Roger J Daly,et al.  Increased Proliferation and Altered Growth Factor Dependence of Human Mammary Epithelial Cells Overexpressing the Gab2 Docking Protein* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Lindsay Hinck,et al.  Key stages in mammary gland development: The mammary end bud as a motile organ , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[22]  A. Manni.  Endocrinology of Breast Cancer , 1999, Contemporary Endocrinology.

[23]  Celeste M. Nelson,et al.  Integrated morphodynamic signalling of the mammary gland , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Multiscale cancer modeling. , 2010, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[25]  S. Tavaré,et al.  Investigating stem cells in human colon by using methylation patterns , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Y. Jan,et al.  Inactivation of Numb and Numblike in Embryonic Dorsal Forebrain Impairs Neurogenesis and Disrupts Cortical Morphogenesis , 2003, Neuron.

[27]  H. Nakauchi,et al.  Asymmetric Division and Lineage Commitment at the Level of Hematopoietic Stem Cells , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[28]  François Vaillant,et al.  Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell , 2006, Nature.

[29]  P. Maini,et al.  Cellular adaptations to hypoxia and acidosis during somatic evolution of breast cancer , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  P. Chambon,et al.  Paracrine signaling through the epithelial estrogen receptor α is required for proliferation and morphogenesis in the mammary gland , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Hiromitsu Nakauchi,et al.  Long-Term Lymphohematopoietic Reconstitution by a Single CD34-Low/Negative Hematopoietic Stem Cell , 1996, Science.

[32]  Kevin R. Long,et al.  Unified Embedded Parallel Finite Element Computations via Software-Based Fr[e-acute]chet Differentiation , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[33]  B. Sidell,et al.  Intracellular oxygen diffusion: the roles of myoglobin and lipid at cold body temperature. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  Mary E. Edgerton,et al.  A Novel, Patient-Specific Mathematical Pathology Approach for Assessment of Surgical Volume: Application to Ductal Carcinoma in situ of The Breast , 2011, Analytical cellular pathology.

[35]  K. Ono,et al.  Changes in the regulation of cortical neurogenesis contribute to encephalization during amniote brain evolution , 2013, Nature Communications.

[36]  François Vaillant,et al.  Steroid hormone receptor status of mouse mammary stem cells. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  Sylvain V Costes,et al.  Phenotypic transition maps of 3D breast acini obtained by imaging-guided agent-based modeling. , 2011, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[38]  Magda El-Shenawee,et al.  Computational Model of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The Effects of Contact Inhibition on Pattern Formation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Paul Macklin,et al.  Improved patient-specific calibration for agent-based cancer modeling. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  Peter Wernet,et al.  Primitive human hematopoietic cells give rise to differentially specified daughter cells upon their initial cell division. , 2006, Blood.

[41]  John Landua,et al.  A Geometrically-Constrained Mathematical Model of Mammary Gland Ductal Elongation Reveals Novel Cellular Dynamics within the Terminal End Bud , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  A. Kriegstein,et al.  Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Joseph D Butner,et al.  Simulating cancer growth with multiscale agent-based modeling. , 2015, Seminars in cancer biology.

[44]  H. Frieboes,et al.  Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours , 2010, Nonlinearity.

[45]  J. Williams,et al.  Mammary ductal elongation: differentiation of myoepithelium and basal lamina during branching morphogenesis. , 1983, Developmental biology.

[46]  J. Dick,et al.  Individual stem cells with highly variable proliferation and self-renewal properties comprise the human hematopoietic stem cell compartment , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[47]  J. Visvader,et al.  Mammary stem cells and the differentiation hierarchy: current status and perspectives , 2014, Genes & development.

[48]  J. Ferrer,et al.  Cell Cycle–Dependent Differentiation Dynamics Balances Growth and Endocrine Differentiation in the Pancreas , 2015, PLoS biology.

[49]  Dawn C. Walker,et al.  The virtual cellça candidate co-ordinator for ‘middle-out’ modelling of biological systems , 2009 .

[50]  Benjamin D. Simons,et al.  A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis , 2007, Nature.