Comparison of Supplemental Lighting from High-pressure Sodium Lamps and Light-emitting Diodes during Bedding Plant Seedling Production

Annual bedding plant seedlings or plugs are considered high quality when they are compact, fully rooted transplants with a large stem caliper and high root dry mass. Greenhouses innorthern latitudes rely onsupplemental lighting(SL) fromhigh-pressure sodium lamps (HPS) during winter months to achieve high-quality, finished plugs. Light- emitting diodes (LEDs) offer higher energy efficiencies, a long operating life, and precise waveband specificity that can eliminate wavebands not considered useful. Seedlings of Antirrhinum, Catharanthus, Celosia, Impatiens, Pelargonium, Petunia, Tagetes, Salvia, andViolaweregrownat21 8Cundera16-hourphotoperiodofambientsolarlightandSL of 100 mmol·m L2 ·s -1 from either HPS lamps or LED arrays withvarying proportions (%) of red:blue light (100:0, 85:15, or 70:30). Height of Catharanthus, Celosia, Impatiens, Petunia, Tagetes, Salvia, and Viola was 31%, 29%, 31%, 55%, 20%, 9%, and 35% shorter, respectively, for seedlings grown under the 85:15 red:blue LEDs compared with those grown under HPS lamps. Additionally, stem caliper of Antirrhinum, Pelargonium, and Tagetes was 16%, 8%, and 13% larger, respectively, for seedlings grown under the 85:15 red:blue LEDs compared with seedlings grown under HPS lamps. The quality index (QI), a quantitative measurement of quality, was similar for Antirrhinum, Cathar- anthus,Impatiens,Pelargonium,andTagetesgrownunderLEDsandHPSlamps.However, it was significantly higher for Petunia, Salvia ,a ndViola under 85:15, 70:30, and 100:0 red:blue LEDs than under HPS lamps, respectively. These results indicate that seedling quality for the majority of the species tested under SL from LEDs providing both red and blue light was similar or higher than those grown under HPS lamps.

[1]  E. Runkle,et al.  Modeling growth and development of celosia and impatiens in response to temperature and photosynthetic daily light integral , 2005 .

[2]  J C Sager,et al.  Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red light-emitting diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting. , 1995, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. American Society for Horticultural Science.

[3]  R. Bula,et al.  Evaluation of light emitting diode characteristics for a space-based plant irradiation source. , 1992, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[4]  C. Michael Bourget,et al.  An Introduction to Light-emitting Diodes , 2008 .

[5]  B. A. Eveleens-Clark,et al.  Growth of tomatoes under hybrid led and HPS lighting , 2012 .

[6]  J. Harbinson,et al.  The responses of light interception, photosynthesis and fruit yield of cucumber to LED-lighting within the canopy. , 2010, Physiologia plantarum.

[7]  K. Folta,et al.  Light as a Growth Regulator: Controlling Plant Biology with Narrow-bandwidth Solid-state Lighting Systems , 2008 .

[8]  D. Fanourakis,et al.  Red and Blue Light Effects during Growth on Hydraulic and Stomatal Conductance in Leaves of Young Cucumber Plants , 2012 .

[9]  Samuel Graham,et al.  Thermal effects in packaging high power light emitting diode arrays , 2009 .

[10]  Harry Smith,et al.  Light Quality, Photoperception, and Plant Strategy , 1982 .

[11]  W. Fang,et al.  Effects of Red light on the Growth of Zantedeschia Plantlets in vitro and Tuber Formation Using Light-emitting Diodes , 2005 .

[12]  C. Kubota,et al.  Tomato seedling growth and morphological responses to supplemental LED lighting red:Blue ratios under varied daily solar light integrals , 2012 .

[13]  T. A. Dueck,et al.  Efficiency of light energy used by leaves situated in different levels of a sweet pepper canopy , 2006 .

[14]  C. Brown,et al.  Photomorphogenesis, photosynthesis, and seed yield of wheat plants grown under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with and without supplemental blue lighting. , 1997, Journal of experimental botany.

[15]  R. Bula,et al.  Light-emitting diodes as a radiation source for plants. , 1991, HortScience : a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[16]  Erik S. Runkle,et al.  Photosynthetic daily light integral during the seedling stage influences subsequent growth and flowering of Celosia, Impatiens, Salvia, Tagetes, and Viola , 2005 .

[17]  R. Lopez,et al.  Cuttings of Impatiens, Pelargonium, and Petunia Propagated under Light-emitting Diodes and High-pressure Sodium Lamps Have Comparable Growth, Morphology, Gas Exchange, and Post-transplant Performance , 2013 .

[18]  Erik S. Runkle,et al.  Timing and Duration of Supplemental Lighting during the Seedling Stage Influence Quality and Flowering in Petunia and Pansy , 2010 .

[19]  J. Näkkilä,et al.  INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF SWEET PEPPER WITH INTERLIGHTING , 2006 .

[20]  E. Runkle,et al.  Photosynthetic Daily Light Integral during Propagation Influences Rooting and Growth of Cuttings and Subsequent Development of New Guinea Impatiens and Petunia , 2008 .

[21]  C. Brown,et al.  Life cycle experiments with Arabidopsis grown under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs). , 1998, Life support & biosphere science : international journal of earth space.

[22]  P. Nelson,et al.  Greenhouse operation and management. , 1991 .

[23]  G. Stutte Light-emitting Diodes for Manipulating the Phytochrome Apparatus , 2009 .

[24]  J. E. Faust,et al.  The Effect of Daily Light Integral on Bedding Plant Growth and Flowering , 2005 .

[25]  Cary A. Mitchell,et al.  Plant Productivity in Response to LED Lighting , 2008 .