Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making

The somatic marker hypothesis (Damasio, Tranel, & Damasio, 1991) is a controversial theory asserting that somatic activities implicitly bias human behavior. In this study, we examined the relationship between choice behaviors in the Iowa Gambling Task and patterns of skin conductance responses (SCRs) within a healthy population. Results showed that low SCRs for appraising the monetary outcome of risky decisions were related to persistence in risky choices. Such adherence to risky decisions was not related to poor explicit knowledge about the task. On the other hand, anticipatory SCRs and the effect of them on performance were not confirmed. Our findings suggest that a variation in covert physiological appraisal underlies individual differences in decision making.

[1]  E. Rolls,et al.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Venables,et al.  Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. , 1981 .

[3]  A. Damasio,et al.  Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Joseph E LeDoux.  The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life , 1996 .

[5]  A. Damasio,et al.  Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. , 1991 .

[6]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  D. Fowles,et al.  The three arousal model: implications of gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[8]  A. Benton,et al.  Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction , 1991 .

[9]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Skin conductance recordings and the NaCl concentration of the electrolyte. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[10]  A. Damasio.  Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[11]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[12]  M. Egan,et al.  Serotonin Transporter Genetic Variation and the Response of the Human Amygdala , 2002, Science.

[13]  J. Borod.  The Neuropsychology of emotion , 2000 .

[14]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  K. Lesch,et al.  Association of Anxiety-Related Traits with a Polymorphism in the Serotonin Transporter Gene Regulatory Region , 1996, Science.

[16]  M. Fredrikson,et al.  Human fear conditioning is related to dopaminergic and serotonergic biological markers. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  P. Arnett,et al.  Gray's three-arousal model: an empirical investigation , 2000 .

[18]  A. Damasio.  Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[19]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.