Comparison of Columnar, Surface, and UAS Profiles of Absorbing Aerosol Optical Depth and Single-Scattering Albedo in South-East Poland

The impact of absorbing aerosols on climate is complex, with their potential positive or negative forcing, depending on many factors, including their height distribution and reflective properties of the underlying background. Measurement data is very limited, due to insufficient remote sensing methods dedicated to the retrieval of their vertical distribution. Columnar values of absorbing aerosol optical depth (AAOD) and single scattering albedo (SSA) are retrieved by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). However, the number of available results is low due to sky condition and aerosol optical depth (AOD) limitation. Presented research describes results of field campaigns in Strzyżów (South-East Poland, Eastern Europe) dedicated to the comparison of the absorption coefficient and SSA measurements performed with on-ground in-situ devices (aethalomter, nephelometer), small unmanned aerial system (UAS) carrying micro-aethalometer, as well as with lidar/ceilometer. An important aspect is the comparison of measurement results with those delivered by AERONET. Correlation of absorption to scattering coefficients measured on ground (0.79) and correlation of extinction on ground to AOD measured by AERONET (0.77) was visibly higher than correlation between AOD and AAOD retrieved by AERONET (0.56). Columnar SSA was weakly correlated with ground SSA (higher values of columnar SSA), which were mainly explained by hygroscopic effects, increasing scattering coefficient in ambient (wet conditions), and partly high uncertainty of SSA retrieval. AAOD derived with the use of profiles from UAS up to PBL height, was estimated to contribute in average to 37% of the total AAOD. A method of AAOD estimation, in the whole troposphere, with use of measured vertical profiles of absorption coefficient and extinction coefficient profiles from lidars was proposed. AAOD measured with this method has poor correlation with AERONET data, however for some measurements, within PBL, AAOD was higher than reported by AERONET, suggesting potential underestimation in photometric measurement under particular conditions. Correlation of absorption coefficient in profile to on ground measurements decrease with altitude. Measurements of SSA from drones agree well with ground measurements and are lower than results from AERONET, which suggests a larger contribution of absorbing aerosols. As an alternative for AAOD estimation in case of lack of AERONET AAOD data simple models are proposed, which base on AOD scaling with SSA measured with different methods. Proposed solution increase potential of absorption coefficient measurements in vertical profiles and columns of the atmosphere. Presented solutions make measurements of absorption coefficients in vertical profiles more affordable and allow rough estimation of columnar values for the whole atmosphere.

[1]  N. Hyslop,et al.  A critical review of filter transmittance measurements for aerosol light absorption, and de novo calibration for a decade of monitoring on PTFE membranes , 2016 .

[2]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Dependence of climate forcing and response on the altitude of black carbon aerosols , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[3]  T. Eck,et al.  Intercomparison of aerosol single‐scattering albedo derived from AERONET surface radiometers and LARGE in situ aircraft profiles during the 2011 DRAGON‐MD and DISCOVER‐AQ experiments , 2014 .

[4]  I. Brooks,et al.  Finding Boundary Layer Top: Application of a Wavelet Covariance Transform to Lidar Backscatter Profiles , 2003 .

[5]  J. Ogren,et al.  Towards Aerosol Light-Absorption Measurements with a 7-Wavelength Aethalometer: Evaluation with a Photoacoustic Instrument and 3-Wavelength Nephelometer , 2005 .

[6]  D. Ceburnis,et al.  Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms , 2009 .

[7]  A. Pietruczuk,et al.  Impact of urban pollution emitted in Warsaw on aerosol properties , 2013 .

[8]  J. Klett.  Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios. , 1985, Applied optics.

[9]  K. Markowicz,et al.  UAS as a Support for Atmospheric Aerosols Research: Case Study , 2018, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[10]  Sally A. McFarlane,et al.  Vertical distribution and radiative effects of mineral dust and biomass burning aerosol over West Africa during DABEX , 2008 .

[11]  Iwona S. Stachlewska,et al.  Vertical variability of aerosol single-scattering albedo and equivalent black carbon concentration based on in-situ and remote sensing techniques during the iAREA campaigns in Ny-Ålesund , 2017 .

[12]  U. Wandinger,et al.  Inversion with regularization for the retrieval of tropospheric aerosol parameters from multiwavelength lidar sounding. , 2002, Applied optics.

[13]  G. Sangiorgi,et al.  Vertical profiles of aerosol absorption coefficient from micro-Aethalometer data and Mie calculation over Milan. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  R. Engelmann,et al.  Near-range receiver unit of the next generation PollyXt used with Koldeway Aerosol Raman Lidar in Arctic , 2016 .

[15]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Microphysical particle parameters from extinction and backscatter lidar data by inversion with regularization: theory. , 1999, Applied optics.

[16]  Iwona S. Stachlewska,et al.  Temporal variations in optical and microphysical properties of mineral dust and biomass burning aerosol derived from daytime Raman lidar observations over Warsaw, Poland , 2017 .

[17]  Hiren Jethva,et al.  What factors control the trend of increasing AAOD over the United States in the last decade? , 2017 .

[18]  E. Highwood,et al.  Climate response to tropospheric absorbing aerosols in an intermediate general‐circulation model , 2004 .

[19]  B. Samset,et al.  Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements , 2017 .

[20]  J. Klett.  Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns. , 1981, Applied optics.

[21]  Steve Chamberlain-Ward,et al.  Advances in Nephelometry through the Ecotech Aurora Nephelometer , 2011, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  A. Szkop,et al.  Ceilometer observations of the boundary layer over Warsaw, Poland , 2012, Acta Geophysica.

[23]  J. Anderson,et al.  Mass monitoring of carbonaceous aerosols with a spectrophone , 1979 .

[24]  Krzysztof M. Markowicz,et al.  The relation between columnar and surface aerosol optical properties in a background environment , 2017 .

[25]  D. Müller,et al.  Inversion of multiwavelength Raman lidar data for retrieval of bimodal aerosol size distribution. , 2004, Applied optics.

[26]  C. Chung,et al.  Sensitivity of aerosol direct radiative forcing to aerosol vertical profile , 2014 .

[27]  Luis Felipe Gonzalez,et al.  An Overview of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Air Quality Measurements: Present Applications and Future Prospectives , 2016, Sensors.

[28]  G. Sangiorgi,et al.  Vertical profiles of aerosol and black carbon in the Arctic: a seasonalphenomenology along 2 years (2011–2012) of field campaigns , 2016 .

[29]  I. Stachlewska,et al.  Properties of biomass burning aerosol mixtures derived at fine temporal and spatial scales from Raman lidar measurements: Part I optical properties , 2019 .

[30]  Krzysztof M. Markowicz,et al.  Observation of vertical variability of black carbon concentration in lower troposphere on campaigns in Poland , 2016 .

[31]  Giorgio Fiocco,et al.  Influence of the vertical profile of Saharan dust on the visible direct radiative forcing , 2005 .

[32]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar , 2008 .

[33]  J. Ogren,et al.  Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .

[34]  Michael D. King,et al.  A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .

[35]  Jasper R. Lewis,et al.  Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[36]  Carreño Carreño,et al.  Evaluación de la diversidad taxonómica y funcional de la comunidad microbiana relacionada con el ciclo del nitrógeno en suelos de cultivo de arroz con diferentes manejos del tamo , 2020 .

[37]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon , 2008 .

[38]  Aerosol absorption profiling from the synergy of lidar and sun-photometry: the ACTRIS-2 campaigns in Germany, Greece and Cyprus , 2018 .

[39]  T. Novakov,et al.  The aethalometer — An instrument for the real-time measurement of optical absorption by aerosol particles , 1983 .

[40]  M. P. Utrillas,et al.  Determination and analysis of in situ spectral aerosol optical properties by a multi-instrumental approach , 2014 .

[41]  Ying Wang,et al.  Vertical profiles of black carbon measured by a micro-aethalometer in summerin the North China Plain , 2016 .

[42]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[43]  Petra Seibert,et al.  Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height , 2000 .

[44]  W. P. Arnott,et al.  Spectral light absorption by ambient aerosols influenced by biomass burning in the Amazon Basin ? I. Comparison and field calibration of absorption measurement techniques , 2005 .

[45]  A. Wiedensohler,et al.  Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer , 2010 .

[46]  Joseph T. Hodges,et al.  Photoacoustic Measurements of Amplification of the Absorption Cross Section for Coated Soot Aerosols , 2011 .

[47]  D. Althausen,et al.  Raman lidar water vapor profiling over Warsaw, Poland , 2017 .

[48]  Jay R. Turner,et al.  Post-processing Method to Reduce Noise while Preserving High Time Resolution in Aethalometer Real-time Black Carbon Data , 2011 .

[49]  M. V. Ramana,et al.  Capturing vertical profiles of aerosols and black carbon over the Indian Ocean using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles , 2007 .

[50]  T. Diehl,et al.  Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty , 2012 .

[51]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[52]  Sensitivity of shortwave radiative fluxes to the vertical distribution of aerosol single scattering albedo in the presence of a desert dust layer , 2010 .

[53]  Detlef Müller,et al.  Theory of inversion with two-dimensional regularization: profiles of microphysical particle properties derived from multiwavelength lidar measurements. , 2008, Applied optics.

[54]  Iwona S. Stachlewska,et al.  Study of aerosol optical properties during long-range transport of biomass burning from Canada to Central Europe in July 2013 , 2016 .

[55]  F. G. Fernald.  Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments. , 1984, Applied optics.

[56]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  The automated multiwavelength Raman polarization and water-vapor lidar PollyXT: The neXT generation , 2016 .

[57]  V. S. Kozlov,et al.  Estimation of black carbon emissions from Siberian fires using satellite observations of absorption and extinction optical depths , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[58]  D. Koch,et al.  Black carbon semi-direct effects on cloud cover: review and synthesis , 2010 .

[59]  M. Schnaiter,et al.  Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers , 2003 .

[60]  D. Massabò,et al.  Comparison of different aethalometer correction schemes and a reference multi-wavelength absorption technique for ambient aerosol data , 2016 .