How Frontoparietal Brain Regions Mediate Imitative and Complementary Actions: An fMRI Study

The ‘mirror neuron system’ (MNS), located within inferior parietal lobe (IPL) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), creates an internal motor representation of the actions we see and has been implicated in imitation. Recently, the MNS has been implicated in non-identical responses: when the actions we must execute do not match those that we observe. However, in such conflicting situations non action-specific cognitive control networks also located in frontoparietal regions may be involved. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study participants made both similar and dissimilar actions within two action contexts: imitative and complementary. We aimed to determine whether activity within IPL/IFG depends on (i) responding under an imitative versus complementary context (ii) responding with similar versus dissimilar responses, and (iii) observing hand actions versus symbolic arrow cue stimuli. Activity within rIPL/rIFG regions was largest during observation of hand actions compared with arrow cues. Specifically, rIPL/rIFG were recruited only during the imitative context, when participants responded with similar actions. When responding to symbolic arrow cues, rIPL/rIFG activity increased during dissimilar responses, reflecting increased demands placed on general cognitive control mechanisms. These results suggest a specific role of rIPL/rIFG during imitation of hand actions, and also a general role of frontoparietal areas in mediating dissimilar responses to both hand actions and symbolic stimuli. We discuss our findings in relation to recent work that has examined the role of frontoparietal brain structures in joint-actions and inter-actor cooperation. We conclude that the specific brain regions identified here to show increased activation during action observation conditions are likely to form part of a mechanism specifically involved in matching observed actions directly with internal motor plans. Conversely, observation of arrow cues recruited part of a wider cognitive control network involved in the rapid remapping of stimulus-response associations.

[1]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems , 1995 .

[8]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[14]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Kawato,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination of Two Modular Architectures for Switching Multiple Internal Models , 2022 .

[17]  M. Iacoboni.  Neural mechanisms of imitation , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[19]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[23]  Ada Kritikos,et al.  Placing actions in context: motor facilitation following observation of identical and non-identical manual acts , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[25]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror System , 2007, Current Biology.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .