Olfactory information processing in honeybee, Apis mellifera, nestmate recognition

We used nestmate recognition as a model system for testing how animals discriminate complex odour mixtures. Olfactory discrimination is important in social recognition in many animal species, yet the methods used by animals to interpret olfactory social signals are poorly understood. Our first hypothesis was that a guard honeybee would develop a new recognition template (the information used to discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates) when exposed to cue compounds. The data supported the conclusion that guard bees can adopt a new template. Our second hypothesis was that a bee's recognition cues must completely match a colony's template to identify that bee as a colony member. We found that if any one of five compounds in a template applied to a guard bee was absent on another bee, then the guard was unlikely to identify that bee as a colony member. Partial absence of the compound resulted in intermediate or low rates of colony-member identification. We next hypothesized that guard bees assess the ratios of compounds in their template (ratio hypothesis). Alternatively, bees might assess the concentration of each compound independently (concentration hypothesis). Our tests of the ratio and concentration hypotheses suggested that each component of the template is important for discrimination. Whereas the data did not fully support the ratio hypothesis, guard bees assessed the concentrations of an incoming bee's recognition cues and evaluated them, at least partially, in the context of other cues. This information was then used to make discriminations between nestmates and non-nestmates.

[1]  M. Breed,et al.  Testing the blank slate hypothesis: why honey bee colonies accept young bees , 2004, Insectes Sociaux.

[2]  M. Breed,et al.  Honey bee, Apis mellifera, nestmate discrimination: hydrocarbon effects and the evolutionary implications of comb choice , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  J. Lachaud,et al.  Cuticular Hydrocarbons of Kapala sulcifacies (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae) and Its Host, the Ponerine Ant Ectatomma ruidum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2001 .

[4]  W. Getz An analysis of learned kin recognition in hymenoptera , 1982 .

[5]  J. Erber,et al.  Tactile motor learning in the antennal system of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  I. Weissman,et al.  EVOLUTION OF ALLORECOGNITION IN BOTRYLLID ASCIDIANS INFERRED FROM A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Robert E. Johnston,et al.  Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates , 1999, Springer US.

[8]  Victoria Soroker,et al.  Nestmate recognition in the ant Cataglyphis niger : do queens matter? , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  M. Breed,et al.  Comb wax effects on the ontogeny of honey bee nestmate recognition , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Michael D. Breed,et al.  RECOGNITION PHEROMONES OF THE HONEY BEE , 1998 .

[11]  T. Finger,et al.  Neurobiology of taste and smell , 1987 .

[12]  R. Johnston,et al.  KIN AND INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION Odor Signals, Social Experience, and Mechanisms of Recognition , 1999 .

[13]  R. Watson,et al.  Context-dependent nestmate discrimination in the paper wasp, Polistes dominulus : a critical test of the optimal acceptance threshold model , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  H. Reeve,et al.  Nestmate recognition in social wasps: the origin and acquisition of recognition odours , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  P. Sherman,et al.  Kin Recognition by Phenotype Matching , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[16]  S. Lahav,et al.  Direct Behavioral Evidence for Hydrocarbons as Ant Recognition Discriminators , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[17]  S. Turillazzi,et al.  Deciphering the recognition signature within the cuticular chemical profile of paper wasps , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  A. J. Moore,et al.  The guard honey bee: ontogeny and behavioural variability of workers performing a specialized task , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  M. Crosland Kin recognition in the ant Rhytidoponera confusa II. Gestalt odour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  M. Breed,et al.  Olfaction in Guard Honey Bee Responses to Non-Nestmates , 1997 .

[21]  Bruce Waldman Mechanisms of kin recognition , 1987 .

[22]  A. Blaustein,et al.  Kin recognition in anuran amphibians , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  W. Getz,et al.  Olfactory sensitivity and discrimination of mixtures in the honeybeeApis mellifera , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  R. Johnston,et al.  Kin recognition in golden hamsters: evidence for phenotype matching , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  K. Espelie,et al.  Social wasps use nest paper hydrocarbons for nestmate recognition , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Adaptive shifts in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) guarding behavior support predictions of the acceptance threshold model , 2000 .

[27]  Michael D. Breed,et al.  Do simple rules apply in honey-bee nestmate discrimination? , 1992, Nature.

[28]  M. Crosland Kin recognition in the ant Rhytidoponera confusa I. Environmental odour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  R. Johnston,et al.  Individual recognition by use of odours in golden hamsters: the nature of individual representations , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  W. Getz Genetically based kin recognition systems , 1981 .

[31]  M. Breed,et al.  Floral oils: their effect on nestmate recognition in the honey bee, Apis mellifera , 1998, Insectes Sociaux.

[32]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  R. Grosberg,et al.  KIN INTERACTIONS IN A COLONIAL HYDROZOAN (HYDRACTINIA SYMBIOLONGICARPUS): POPULATION STRUCTURE ON A MOBILE LANDSCAPE , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  D. Liang,et al.  “You are what you eat”: Diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[35]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Recognition of Individuals Within and Between Groups of Free-Ranging Vervet Monkeys1 , 1982 .

[36]  H. Reeve,et al.  The Evolution of Conspecific Acceptance Thresholds , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[37]  P. Klopfer,et al.  Parental Care in Mammals , 1981, Springer US.

[38]  R. Crozier,et al.  Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  M. Breed,et al.  The role of wax comb in honey bee nestmate recognition , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  K. Espelie,et al.  Kin recognition pheromones in social wasps: combining chemical and behavioural evidence , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  V. Soroker,et al.  The postpharyngeal gland as a “Gestalt” organ for nestmate recognition in the antCataglyphis niger , 1994, Naturwissenschaften.

[43]  P. Sherman,et al.  Kin recognition in animals , 1983 .