A FRAMEWORK FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT IN THE INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN

A framework for ecosystem management is proposed. This framework assumes the purpose of ecosystem management is to maintain the integrity of ecosystems over time and space. It is based on four ecosystem principles: ecosystems are dynamic, can be viewed as hierarchies with temporal and spatial dimensions, have limits, and are relatively unpredictable. This approach recognizes that people are part of ecosystems and that stewardship must be able to resolve tough challenges including how to meet multiple demands with finite resources. The framework describes a general planning model for ecosystem management that has four iterative steps: monitoring, assessment , decision-making, and implementation. Since ecosystems cross jurisdictional lines, the implementation of the framework depends on partnerships among land managers, the scientific community, and stakeholders. It proposes that decision-making be based on information provided by the best available science and the most appropriate technologies for land management. The Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project received extensive comments (including anonymous peer reviews) on previous versions of the " Framework for Ecosystem Management in the Interior Columbia Basin. " Lack of clarity was the main complaint. Earlier versions were too vague, conceptual, technical, and contained too much jargon. At the same time, many people requested more detail, and mechanisms for implementing ecosystem management. People wanted to know how to link science and land management planning, how this process would be translated into action, how ecosystem management could be incorporated into existing planning processes and decisions, and how a more effective means of stakeholder participation could be developed. In response to these comments, we prepared a new introduction defining the objectives of ecosystem management and the framework. We expanded the discussion of the science concepts underlying ecosystem management. We expanded the discussion of the general planning model and included a discussion of risk assessments. We expanded the discussion on planning and decision-making to explain the connection between assessments and land-use planning processes. The section also attempts to define broader and more effective mechanisms for stakeholder participation.

[1]  B. Marcot Putting Data , Experience and Professional Judgment to Work in Making Land Management Decisions , 2022 .

[2]  J. Thompson,et al.  Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decision , 1959 .

[3]  A. Vining,et al.  Policy analysis : concepts and practice , 1989 .

[4]  T. Allen,et al.  Will similar forests develop on similar sites , 1985 .

[5]  C. S. Holling Resilience of ecosystems: local surprise and global change. , 1985 .

[6]  Mark Jensen,et al.  Volume I: executive summary , 1994 .

[7]  D. Slocombe Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management , 1993 .

[8]  M. Soulé,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: List of contributors , 1987 .

[9]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  A Sand County Almanac , 1949 .

[10]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Economic Theory and Operations Analysis. , 1962 .

[11]  R. E. Grumbine What Is Ecosystem Management , 1994 .

[12]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing , 1973 .

[13]  L. K. Croft,et al.  Interior Columbia Basin ecosystem management project , 1997 .

[14]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[15]  J. Kay,et al.  Book reviews , 1997 .

[16]  A Koestler,et al.  Ghost in the Machine , 1970 .

[17]  R. E. Grumbine Ghost Bears: Exploring The Biodiversity Crisis , 1993 .

[18]  Wolfgang Kreutzer,et al.  System simulation , 1986 .

[19]  William M. Block,et al.  An ecological basis for ecosystem management , 1994 .

[20]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. , 1987 .

[21]  J. Proops,et al.  Humankind and the Environment: An Anatomy of Surprise and Ignorance , 1992, Environmental Values.

[22]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Ecosystem Health New Goals for Environmental Management , 1992 .

[23]  C. Maser Sustainable Forestry: Philosophy, Science, and Economics , 1994 .

[24]  P. Aird Conservation for the sustainable development of forests worldwide: A compendium of concepts and terms , 1994 .

[25]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  The ecological concept of disturbance and its expression at various hierarchical levels , 1989 .

[26]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Linking mechanistic models of tree physiology with models of forest dynamics: Problems of temporal scale , 1988 .

[27]  Rutgers M. Jensen J.,et al.  2 Framework for ecological risk assessment , .

[28]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Forest ecosystem management : an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the forest ecosystem management assessment team , 1993 .

[29]  Howard Hunt Pattee,et al.  The complementarity principle in biological and social structures , 1978 .

[30]  M. Soulé Viable Populations for Conservation: Preface , 1987 .

[31]  S. Arno,et al.  Fire regimes of western larch – lodgepole pine forests in Glacier National Park, Montana , 1991 .

[32]  Kai N. Lee Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Kai N. Lee. 1993. Island Press, Washington, DC. 290 pages. ISBN: 1-59963-197-X. $25.00 , 1993 .

[33]  John Friedmann,et al.  Notes on Societal Action , 1969 .

[34]  W. Robbins,et al.  Landscape and the intermontane Northwest: an environmental history. , 1994 .

[35]  R. Lincoln,et al.  A dictionary of ecology, evolution, and systematics , 1982 .

[36]  J. J. Kay,et al.  A nonequilibrium thermodynamic framework for discussing ecosystem integrity , 1991 .

[37]  E. W. Jones,et al.  Forest Ecology , 1968, Nature.

[38]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Biological Systems as Paradigms for Adaptation , 1975 .

[39]  R. O'Neill A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[40]  A. Tansley The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms , 1935 .

[41]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States , 1992 .

[42]  D. Flores Place: An Argument for Bioregional History , 1994, Environmental History Review.

[43]  F. Cubbage,et al.  Forest Resource Policy , 1993 .

[44]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[45]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[46]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem , 1980 .

[47]  L. Irwin A Process for Improving Wildlife Habitat Models for Assessing Forest Ecosystem Health , 1994 .

[48]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics , 1991 .

[49]  E. David Ford,et al.  Volume V: a framework for sustainable-ecosystem management. , 1994 .

[50]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Disturbance, Diversity, and Invasion: Implications for Conservation , 1992 .

[51]  Walter V. Reid,et al.  Conserving the World's Biological Diversity , 1990 .