Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Online Food Delivery (OFD) Companies Evaluation and Selection: A Case Study in Vietnam

The COVID-19 pandemic has boosted the growth of the online food delivery (OFD) market in every corner of the world. In Vietnam, the food delivery service is rising rapidly and opening a large gateway of opportunities for numerous OFD platforms, also making it a competing business market in this country. Thus, to keep up with the ever-changing market dynamics, there are numerous measures and dimensions for the OFD entrepreneurs to take into consideration towards sustainable development. This paper’s objective is to evaluate major OFD companies in Vietnam based on a comprehensive set of criteria, which are social and environmental criteria (healthy and safety, information security, and environmental impact), economic criteria (delivery cost, operational capability, and risk management), service quality (order fulfillment, delivery speed, convenience of payment, online/offline service level, and customer feedback), and technology (web design, real-time tracking systems, and marketing techniques). To achieve this objective, this work proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)-based framework combining the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS). The FAHP is used to generate criteria weights in which fuzzy set theory is applied to translate the linguistic evaluation statements of experts. Then, WASPAS is used to rank the OFD companies against the selected criteria. The evaluation criteria that have obtained maximum weight priority in the FAHP analysis are “convenience of payment”, “delivery speed”, “online service level”, “order fulfillment”, and “delivery cost”. From the final ranking of WASPAS, Foody is today the best performing OFD player in Vietnam regarding the selected criteria, followed by GrabFood and Now. The proposed methodology can be an accurate and robust evaluation model for the industry, while the managerial implications of this study provide significant materials for decision-makers in the OFD market in improving their businesses towards sustainable development.

[1]  Charlene Li,et al.  Review of Online Food Delivery Platforms and their Impacts on Sustainability , 2020, Sustainability.

[2]  M. Goh,et al.  Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry , 2017 .

[3]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[4]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .

[5]  Ilgin Gokasar,et al.  WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[6]  Lazim Abdullah,et al.  A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Sajad Rezaei,et al.  Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services , 2017 .

[8]  Ying-Chyi Chou,et al.  Assessing the Human Resource in Science and Technology for Asian Countries: Application of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2019, Symmetry.

[9]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[10]  Mohammadreza Badalpur,et al.  An application of WASPAS method in risk qualitative analysis: a case study of a road construction project in Iran , 2019, International Journal of Construction Management.

[11]  Diana Gavilan,et al.  Innovation in online food delivery: Learnings from COVID-19 , 2021, International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science.

[12]  Fiona X. Yang,et al.  To survive or to thrive? China’s luxury hotel restaurants entering O2O food delivery platforms amid the COVID-19 crisis , 2021, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[13]  Zhe Tian,et al.  Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments , 2012 .

[14]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi-expert wind energy technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2015 .

[16]  Rituparna Ghosh,et al.  A STUDY OF E-PAYMENT SYSTEM ON FOOD DELIVERY INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY ON SWIGGY , 2018 .

[17]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  Outsourcing Reverse Logistics for E-Commerce Retailers: A Two-Stage Fuzzy Optimization Approach , 2021, Axioms.

[18]  Faisal Shafique Butt,et al.  An Uncertainty-aware Integrated Fuzzy AHP-WASPAS Model to Evaluate Public Cloud Computing Services , 2018, ANT/SEIT.

[19]  Duygu Sergi,et al.  Prioritization of public services for digitalization using fuzzy Z-AHP and fuzzy Z-WASPAS , 2021, Complex & Intelligent Systems.

[20]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[21]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods , 2021, Mathematics.

[22]  Nesrin Koç Ustali,et al.  Bulanık AHP ve Bulanık WASPAS Yöntemleri ile Yeni Ürün Seçimi , 2019 .

[23]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  A novel hybrid multiple attribute decision-making approach for outsourcing sustainable reverse logistics , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  Ching-Chan Cheng,et al.  Construction of a service quality scale for the online food delivery industry , 2021 .

[25]  Peide Liu,et al.  An approach based on linguistic spherical fuzzy sets for public evaluation of shared bicycles in China , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[26]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application , 2020, Soft Comput..

[27]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A multi-attribute assessment using WASPAS for choosing an optimal indoor environment , 2016 .

[28]  Jyoti Dhingra Darbari,et al.  Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: A sustainable approach. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Mohanad Halaweh Cash on Delivery (COD) as an Alternative Payment Method for E-Commerce Transactions: Analysis and Implications , 2018, Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev..

[30]  Grzegorz Bocewicz,et al.  Ordered fuzzy WASPAS method for selection of improvement projects , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  SOLAR PV POWER PLANT LOCATION SELECTION USING A Z- FUZZY NUMBER BASED AHP , 2018 .

[32]  Wei Yang,et al.  An MAGDM based on constrained FAHP and FTOPSIS and its application to supplier selection , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[33]  Arghya Ray,et al.  User generated content for exploring factors affecting intention to use travel and food delivery services , 2021 .

[34]  Debashree Guha,et al.  Preference programming approach for solving intuitionistic fuzzy AHP , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[35]  Qing Wang,et al.  Dynamic organization model of automated negotiation for 3PL providers selection , 2020, Inf. Sci..