On the temporal mismatch between in-situ and satellite-derived spring phenology of European beech forests

ABSTRACT Forest phenology plays a key role in the global terrestrial ecosystem influencing a range of ecosystem processes such as the annual carbon uptake period, and many food webs and changes in their timing and progression. The timing of the start of the phenology season has been successfully determined at a range of scales, from the individual tree by in situ observations to landscape and continental scales by using remotely sensed vegetation indices (VIs). The spatial resolution of satellites is much coarser than traditional methods, creating a gap between space-borne and actual field observations, which brings limitations to phenological research at the ecosystem level. Several unconsidered methodological and observational-related limitations may lead to misinterpretation of the timing of the satellite-derived signals. The aim of this study is therefore to clarify the meaning of a set of spring phenology metrics derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) time series in beech forests distributed across Europe with respect to PEP725 in situ observations, from 2003 to 2020. To this aim, we (i) tested the differences between remotely sensed and in situ start-of-season (SOS) metrics and (ii) quantified the influence of latitude, elevation, temperature, and precipitation on such differences. Results demonstrated that there is a clear temporal gradient among the different SOS metrics, all of them occurring prior to the in situ observations. Furthermore, latitude and temperatures proved to be the main factors guiding the differences between remotely sensed and in situ SOS metrics. Evidence from this study may help in recognizing the actual meaning of what we see by means of remotely sensed phenology metrics. In this perspective, field observations are crucial in understanding phenology events and provide a reference base. Satellite data, on the other hand, complement field observations by filling in gaps in spatial and temporal coverage, thus enhancing the overall understanding.

[1]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  TROPOMI SIF reveals large uncertainty in estimating the end of plant growing season from vegetation indices data in the Tibetan Plateau , 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[2]  I. Dronova,et al.  Remote sensing of phenology: Towards the comprehensive indicators of plant community dynamics from species to regional scales , 2022, Journal of Ecology.

[3]  Y. Vitasse,et al.  Warming may extend tree growing seasons and compensate for reduced carbon uptake during dry periods , 2022, Journal of Ecology.

[4]  T. McVicar,et al.  phenofit: An R package for extracting vegetation phenology from time series remote sensing , 2022, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[5]  A. Bao,et al.  Phenology-based seasonal terrestrial vegetation growth response to climate variability with consideration of cumulative effect and biological carryover. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Hailiang Chen,et al.  Assessment of Vegetation Phenological Extractions Derived From Three Satellite-Derived Vegetation Indices Based on Different Extraction Algorithms Over the Tibetan Plateau , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[7]  Xiaolin Zhu,et al.  Improving the accuracy of spring phenology detection by optimally smoothing satellite vegetation index time series based on local cloud frequency , 2021 .

[8]  S. Bajocco,et al.  Continuous observations of forest canopy structure using low-cost digital camera traps , 2021 .

[9]  Lennart Nilsen,et al.  Time-Series of Cloud-Free Sentinel-2 NDVI Data Used in Mapping the Onset of Growth of Central Spitsbergen, Svalbard , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[10]  A. Menzel,et al.  Ground and satellite phenology in alpine forests are becoming more heterogeneous across higher elevations with warming , 2021 .

[11]  Sofia Cerasoli,et al.  Using Digital Photography to Track Understory Phenology in Mediterranean Cork Oak Woodlands , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Jose A. Caparros-Santiago,et al.  Land surface phenology as indicator of global terrestrial ecosystem dynamics: A systematic review , 2021 .

[13]  Ke Huang,et al.  The confounding effect of snow cover on assessing spring phenology from space: A new look at trends on the Tibetan Plateau. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Jessica J. Walker,et al.  Solar and sensor geometry, not vegetation response, drive satellite NDVI phenology in widespread ecosystems of the western United States , 2020 .

[15]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Accelerated rate of vegetation green‐up related to warming at northern high latitudes , 2020, Global change biology.

[16]  Fiona Cawkwell,et al.  Status of Phenological Research Using Sentinel-2 Data: A Review , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Deren Li,et al.  A review of vegetation phenological metrics extraction using time-series, multispectral satellite data , 2020 .

[18]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Land surface phenology from VEGETATION and PROBA-V data. Assessment over deciduous forests , 2020, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[19]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Text Mining in Remotely Sensed Phenology Studies: A Review on Research Development, Main Topics, and Emerging Issues , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[20]  M. Mariadassou,et al.  Shifts in the temperature‐sensitive periods for spring phenology in European beech and pedunculate oak clones across latitudes and over recent decades , 2019, Global change biology.

[21]  A. Donnelly,et al.  Temperate deciduous shrub phenology: the overlooked forest layer , 2019, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[22]  José A. Sobrino,et al.  Optimizing and comparing gap-filling techniques using simulated NDVI time series from remotely sensed global data , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[23]  S. Barr,et al.  Assessing spring phenology of a temperate woodland: A multiscale comparison of ground, unmanned aerial vehicle and Landsat satellite observations , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[24]  Sofia Bajocco,et al.  Remotely-sensed phenology of Italian forests: Going beyond the species , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[25]  P. Legendre.  Numerical Ecology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Ecology.

[26]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  In Situ Observations Reveal How Spectral Reflectance Responds to Growing Season Phenology of an Open Evergreen Forest in Alaska , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[27]  G. Henebry,et al.  Evaluation of land surface phenology from VIIRS data using time series of PhenoCam imagery , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[28]  David Helman,et al.  Land surface phenology: What do we really 'see' from space? , 2018, Science of the Total Environment.

[29]  Anne Tolvanen,et al.  Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data , 2018, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[30]  G. Matteucci,et al.  Assessing spring frost effects on beech forests in Central Apennines from remotely-sensed data , 2018 .

[31]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse North American biomes using PhenoCam imagery , 2018, Scientific Data.

[32]  Stephen E. Fick,et al.  WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas , 2017 .

[33]  Cong Wang,et al.  Analysis of Differences in Phenology Extracted from the Enhanced Vegetation Index and the Leaf Area Index , 2017, Sensors.

[34]  Xiaoyang Zhang,et al.  Detecting spatiotemporal changes of peak foliage coloration in deciduous and mixedforests across the Central and Eastern United States , 2017 .

[35]  A. Richardson,et al.  Productivity of North American grasslands is increased under future climate scenarios despite rising aridity , 2016 .

[36]  Wenquan Zhu,et al.  Continuous but diverse advancement of spring-summer phenology in response to climate warming across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau , 2016 .

[37]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Vegetation baseline phenology from kilometric global LAI satellite products , 2016 .

[38]  A. Gonsamo,et al.  The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests , 2015 .

[39]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding , 2015, Nature.

[40]  David Helman,et al.  A Phenology-Based Method for Monitoring Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation in Mediterranean Forests from NDVI Time Series , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Sivasathivel Kandasamy,et al.  An approach for evaluating the impact of gaps and measurement errors on satellite land surface phenology algorithms: Application to 20year NOAA AVHRR data over Canada , 2015 .

[42]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Mapping Forest Fuels through Vegetation Phenology: The Role of Coarse-Resolution Satellite Time-Series , 2015, PloS one.

[43]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Recent spring phenology shifts in western Central Europe based on multiscale observations , 2014 .

[44]  S. Goetz,et al.  Vegetation productivity patterns at high northern latitudes: a multi-sensor satellite data assessment , 2014, Global change biology.

[45]  I. Wing,et al.  Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology , 2014 .

[46]  Pierre Defourny,et al.  A global NDVI and EVI reference data set for land-surface phenology using 13 years of daily SPOT-VEGETATION observations , 2014 .

[47]  K. Beurs,et al.  Dryland vegetation phenology across an elevation gradient in Arizona, USA, investigated with fused MODIS and Landsat data , 2014 .

[48]  David J. Harding,et al.  Amazon forests maintain consistent canopy structure and greenness during the dry season , 2014, Nature.

[49]  Tao Wang,et al.  Declining snow cover may affect spring phenological trend on the Tibetan Plateau , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  O. Sonnentag,et al.  Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system , 2013 .

[51]  G. Henebry,et al.  Remote Sensing of Land Surface Phenology: A Prospectus , 2013 .

[52]  Jürgen Vogt,et al.  Combining satellite derived phenology with climate data for climate change impact assessment , 2012 .

[53]  A. Richardson,et al.  Landscape controls on the timing of spring, autumn, and growing season length in mid‐Atlantic forests , 2012 .

[54]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Statistical Methods for Modelling Land Surface Phenology , 2010 .

[55]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006 , 2009 .

[56]  H. Bleiholder,et al.  The BBCH system to coding the phenological growth stages of plants - history and publications. , 2009 .

[57]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Characterizing the Seasonal Dynamics of Plant Community Photosynthesis Across a Range of Vegetation Types , 2009 .

[58]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[59]  P. Rich,et al.  Phenology of mixed woody-herbaceous ecosystems following extreme events: net and differential responses. , 2008, Ecology.

[60]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades , 2007 .

[61]  J. Mustard,et al.  Cross-scalar satellite phenology from ground, Landsat, and MODIS data , 2007 .

[62]  C. Appenzeller,et al.  A comparative study of satellite and ground-based phenology , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[63]  P. Beck,et al.  Improved monitoring of vegetation dynamics at very high latitudes: A new method using MODIS NDVI , 2006 .

[64]  J. Mustard,et al.  Green leaf phenology at Landsat resolution: Scaling from the field to the satellite , 2006 .

[65]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[66]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Land surface phenology and temperature variation in the International Geosphere–Biosphere Program high‐latitude transects , 2005 .

[67]  R. Tateishi,et al.  Analysis of phenological change patterns using 1982–2000 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data , 2004 .

[68]  A. Gitelson.  Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. , 2004, Journal of plant physiology.

[69]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[70]  Rein Ahas,et al.  Variations of the climatological growing season (1951–2000) in Germany compared with other countries , 2003 .

[71]  A. Strahler,et al.  Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS , 2003 .

[72]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[73]  Paul J. Van den Brink,et al.  Principal response curves: Analysis of time‐dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress , 1999 .

[74]  Jesslyn F. Brown,et al.  Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery , 1994 .

[75]  B. Holben.  Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data , 1986 .

[76]  Calyampudi R. Rao.  The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research , 1964 .