FMEA for the reliability of hydroformed flanged part for automotive application

Tube hydroforming technology is widely used in the automotive industries due to its advantages such as weight reduction, increased strength, improved quality, and reduced tooling cost compared to conventional manufacturing technology. The hydroformed parts often have to be structurally joined at some point. Therefore, the hydroformed automotive parts which have a localized attachment flange are useful. In many cases, the parts formed by hydroforming process are directly related with structural safety, reliability of hydroformed parts must be considered. In this study, hydroforming process of flanged rectangular parts was designed and process reliability was investigated. Finite element analysis was performed to optimize tool geometry considering process parameters such as die aspect ratio and pressure conditions with Dynaform 5.5. Hydroforming experiments to fabricate a flanged rectangular part were performed with optimized tool geometry. The relationship between process parameters and defect was analyzed by FMEA (failure modes and effects analysis). The result shows that process condition was optimized and reliability of rectangular part was increased.

[1]  Jaeho Jang,et al.  Investigation on the Hydroforming Characteristics of Double‐layered Tubes , 2008 .

[2]  Shi Jian Yuan,et al.  Hydroforming of automotive structural components with rectangular-sections , 2006 .

[3]  F. Fantini,et al.  Failure Analysis-assisted FMEA , 2006, Microelectron. Reliab..

[4]  Soo-Ik Oh,et al.  Applications of hydroforming processes to automobile parts , 2006 .

[5]  Byung Chai Lee,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization using convex approximations and sequential optimization and reliability assessment method , 2010 .

[6]  Dong Ho Bae,et al.  Reliability assessment and prediction of a fatigue design criterion for the gas-welded joints , 2010 .

[7]  B. J. Mac Donald,et al.  Determination of the optimal load path for tube hydroforming processes using a fuzzy load control algorithm and finite element analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Chester J. Van Tyne,et al.  Strain hardening behavior during manufacturing of tube shapes by hydroforming , 2009 .

[9]  Taylan Altan,et al.  An overall review of the tube hydroforming (THF) technology , 2001 .

[10]  Young Hoon Moon,et al.  Finite element analysis and experimental confirmation of warm hydroforming process for aluminum alloy , 2007 .

[11]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Prediction of forming limits and parameters in the tube hydroforming process , 2002 .

[12]  Ba Nghiep Nguyen,et al.  A Numerical Process Control Method for Circular-Tube Hydroforming Prediction , 2004 .

[13]  Ming Yang,et al.  Hydroforming process optimization of aluminum alloy tube using intelligent control technique , 2006 .

[14]  S. Nakamura,et al.  Hydromechanical drawing of automotive parts , 1994 .

[15]  Curt A. Lavender,et al.  Tailoring of mechanical properties of hydroformed aluminum tubes , 2007 .

[16]  Sang-Min Lee,et al.  A Study on the Resistance Spot Weldability of 590 MPa Grade DP Steel with Modified Electrode Tip , 2010 .

[17]  Seung-Boo Jung,et al.  Effect of Multiple Reflows on the Mechanical Reliability of Solder Joint in LED Package , 2010 .