Monovariate and multivariate analyses including logistic regression were performed to determine associations among predicting variables [age, gender, immunofluorescence pattern, and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titer] and anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) and -dsDNA antibodies (Abs) in 1089 patients with positive fluorescent ANA (FANA) test results. Samples with high titer ANAs had an increased frequency of anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs. The receiver operating (ROC) curves of the ANA titer for anti-ENA Abs had a larger under the curve area compared to the ROC curve for anti-dsDNA Abs, indicating that ANA titer is better for predicting anti-ENA Abs than anti-dsDNA Abs. There was no relation noticed between immunofluorescence patterns and anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs except an increased frequency of anti-dsDNA Abs found in samples with a homogeneous pattern. Probability calculations on the basis of the ANA pattern and the titer showed that samples with low titer ANAs (1:160 or less) had low probabilities for anti-ENA Abs (0.002–0.009) regardless of immunofluorescence patterns. However, samples with a homogeneous pattern at any titers including low titers had high probabilities for anti-dsDNA Abs. A decreased frequency of anti-dsDNA Abs as measured by Crithidia assay was noticed in samples from patients aged 50 or older. In contrast, no association was noticed between age and anti-ENA Abs. There was no female preponderance found in the presence of anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs. In conclusion, our study shows that the ANA titer but not the immunofluorescence pattern is useful in predicting anti-ENA Abs. In contrast, both the ANA titer and the immunofluorescence pattern help in predicting anti-dsDNA Abs. Samples with low titer ANAs (1:160 or less) may not need a further test for anti-ENA Abs unless an ANA-associated disease is highly suspected. However, a test for anti-dsDNA Abs should be considered in samples with a homogeneous pattern at any titer including low titers.
[1]
M. Sailer,et al.
Usefulness of antinuclear antibody testing to screen for rheumatic diseases
,
1997,
Archives of disease in childhood.
[2]
R. Ritchie,et al.
The distribution of antinuclear antibody titers in "normal" children and adults.
,
1999,
The Journal of rheumatology.
[3]
A. Russell,et al.
Is high titre ANA specific for connective tissue disease?
,
2000,
Clinical and experimental rheumatology.
[4]
G. Verbruggen,et al.
Detection and identification of antinuclear autoantibodies in the serum of normal blood donors.
,
1993,
Clinical and experimental rheumatology.
[5]
Suman Gupta,et al.
Children and Adults
,
2003
.
[6]
I. Peene,et al.
Detection and identification of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in a large and consecutive cohort of serum samples referred for ANA testing
,
2001,
Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[7]
D. Estes,et al.
Antinuclear antibodies.
,
1972,
Pathobiology annual.
[8]
A Kavanaugh,et al.
Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. American College of Pathologists.
,
2000,
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.