Noise-induced bias for convolution-based interpolation in digital image correlation.

In digital image correlation (DIC), the noise-induced bias is significant if the noise level is high or the contrast of the image is low. However, existing methods for the estimation of the noise-induced bias are merely applicable to traditional interpolation methods such as linear and cubic interpolation, but are not applicable to generalized interpolation methods such as BSpline and OMOMS. Both traditional interpolation and generalized interpolation belong to convolution-based interpolation. Considering the widely use of generalized interpolation, this paper presents a theoretical analysis of noise-induced bias for convolution-based interpolation. A sinusoidal approximate formula for noise-induced bias is derived; this formula motivates an estimating strategy which is with speed, ease, and accuracy; furthermore, based on this formula, the mechanism of sophisticated interpolation methods generally reducing noise-induced bias is revealed. The validity of the theoretical analysis is established by both numerical simulations and actual subpixel translation experiment. Compared to existing methods, formulae provided by this paper are simpler, briefer, and more general. In addition, a more intuitionistic explanation of the cause of noise-induced bias is provided by quantitatively characterized the position-dependence of noise variability in the spatial domain.

[1]  Franccois Hild,et al.  Digital Image Correlation: from Displacement Measurement to Identification of Elastic Properties – a Review , 2006 .

[2]  M. Sutton,et al.  Effects of subpixel image restoration on digital correlation error estimates , 1988 .

[3]  H. Haddadi,et al.  Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique , 2008 .

[4]  Michael Unser,et al.  Fast B-spline Transforms for Continuous Image Representation and Interpolation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  I. Yamaguchi,et al.  A laser-speckle strain gauge , 1981 .

[6]  Sven Bossuyt,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation , 2006 .

[7]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  Error Assessment in Stereo-based Deformation Measurements , 2011 .

[8]  M. Unser,et al.  Interpolation Revisited , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[10]  Xiaoping Wu,et al.  Fourier-based interpolation bias prediction in digital image correlation. , 2015, Optics express.

[11]  M. Unser,et al.  Interpolation revisited [medical images application] , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[13]  W. Peters,et al.  Digital Imaging Techniques In Experimental Stress Analysis , 1982 .

[14]  Jianxin Gao,et al.  Deformation-pattern-based digital speckle correlation for coefficient of thermal expansion evaluation of film. , 2011, Optics express.

[15]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[16]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation (DISC) , 2001 .

[17]  R. Keys Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing , 1981 .

[18]  Michael Unser,et al.  Splines: a perfect fit for signal and image processing , 1999, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[19]  Thomas S Denney,et al.  Measurement of transient deformations using digital image correlation method and high-speed photography: application to dynamic fracture. , 2007, Applied optics.

[20]  Jun Ma,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of digital image correlation with B-spline interpolation. , 2011, Optics letters.

[21]  Jean-José Orteu,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Accuracy in the Ultimate Error Regime: Main Results of a Collaborative Benchmark , 2013 .

[22]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics , 1985 .

[23]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  Effects of Various Shape Functions and Subset Size in Local Deformation Measurements Using DIC , 2015 .

[24]  E. Meijering A chronology of interpolation: from ancient astronomy to modern signal and image processing , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[25]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  On the propagation and pulsation of Portevin-Le Chatelier deformation bands: An experimental study with digital speckle pattern metrology , 2005 .

[26]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[27]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[28]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Full-field representation of discretely sampled surface deformation for displacement and strain analysis , 1991 .

[29]  Xie Huimin,et al.  Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation , 2006 .

[30]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  Time-resolved deformation measurements of the Portevin–Le Chatelier bands , 2007 .