Analysis of Nanohydroxyapatite/Polyamide-66 Cage, Titanium Mesh, and Iliac Crest in Spinal Reconstruction of the Patients with Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis

Background: The standard recommended and common reconstruction method for spinal tuberculosis is titanium mesh bone graft and autogenous iliac crest. However, these methods have their own disadvantages. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of one-stage posterior debridement with iliac bone graft, titanium mesh bone graft, or nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage in thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. Materials and Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2018, 57 patients with thoracic or lumbar tuberculosis were treated by interbody bone graft combined with posterior internal fixation after debridement. Thirteen patients were treated with iliac bone graft to construct the stability of the vertebral body, 26 patients were treated with titanium mesh bone graft, and 18 patients were treated with nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage bone graft. The main clinical results were evaluated by intervertebral height, cage subsidence, operation time, operative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative complications, visual analog scale (VAS) score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, and bone graft fusion time. All the outcomes were recorded and analyzed by statistical methods. Results: The mean follow-up time was 24.5 months. Neurologic function was improved in most patients at the last follow-up. There were significant differences in ESR, CRP, and VAS score between preoperative and postoperative values; however, there were no significant differences in ESR, CRP, and VAS score among the three groups. There were no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative complications among the three groups at discharge. There was no significant difference in ASIA grade among the three groups at the last follow-up. Nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage group had a lower cage subsidence (P = 0.013). The bone graft fusion time of the nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage group was significantly shorter than the iliac bone graft group and the titanium mesh bone graft (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The follow-up outcomes showed that the method involving one-stage posterior debridement and internal fixation, interbody graft, and fusion is an effective and safe surgical method for patients with thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. The incidence rate of cage subsidence was less and the bone graft fusion time was shorter with nanohydroxyap atite/polyamide 66 cage when compared with iliac bone graft and titanium mesh bone graft in the surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. Nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage has a promising application prospect to be a new bone graft material.

[1]  V. Yerramneni,et al.  MITLIF Operative Nuances- Step by Step , 2021, Neurology India.

[2]  P. Kandwal,et al.  PEEK vs Titanium Cage for Anterior Column Reconstruction in Active Spinal Tuberculosis: A Comparative Study , 2021, Neurology India.

[3]  D. Agrawal,et al.  Transpedicular Approach for Corpectomy and Circumferential Arthrodesis in Traumatic Lumbar Vertebral Body Burst Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcome in 35 Patients , 2021, Neurology India.

[4]  Y. Zuo,et al.  The ultralong-term comparison of osteogenic behavior of three scaffolds with different matrices and degradability between one and two years. , 2020, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[5]  G. Grasso,et al.  Lumbar Spinal Fixation Removal by a Minimal Invasive Microscope-Assisted Technique. Case Report with Technical Description , 2020, Neurology India.

[6]  R. Garg,et al.  Mediastinal Widening in a Patient with Paraplegia: An Unusual Cause , 2020, Neurology India.

[7]  B. He,et al.  Comparison of three different bone graft methods for single segment lumbar tuberculosis: A retrospective single-center cohort study. , 2020, International journal of surgery.

[8]  R. Menger,et al.  Commentary on Surgical Treatment of Scoliosis-Associated with Syringomyelia: The Role of Syrinx Size , 2020, Neurology India.

[9]  Yueming Song,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Scoliosis-Associated with Syringomyelia: The Role of Syrinx Size , 2020, Neurology India.

[10]  A. Jain,et al.  Tuberculosis of the Spine. , 2020, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Pankaj K. Singh,et al.  Surgical Outcome in Spinal Operation in Patients Aged 70 Years and Above , 2020, Neurology India.

[12]  Mingxing Tang,et al.  Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Outcomes for Comparison Between Titanium Mesh Cage and Allogeneic Bone Graft to Reconstruct Anterior Column Through Posterior Approach for the Surgical treatment of Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis with Kyphosis. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[13]  D. Hao,et al.  The reasons and clinical treatments of postoperative relapse of Pott's disease , 2018, Medicine.

[14]  R. Dunn,et al.  Spinal tuberculosis: review of current management. , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[15]  D. Hao,et al.  Single posterior surgical management for lumbosacral tuberculosis: titanium mesh versus iliac bone graft , 2017, Medicine.

[16]  Yue Zhou,et al.  Prognostic Factors for Recovery of Patients After Surgery for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[17]  Mingxing Tang,et al.  Debridement, interbody graft using titanium mesh cages, posterior instrumentation and fusion in the surgical treatment of multilevel noncontiguous spinal tuberculosis in elderly patients via a posterior-only. , 2017, Injury.

[18]  Jiaming Liu,et al.  Is nonstructural bone graft useful in surgical treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis? , 2016, Medicine.

[19]  H. Refae,et al.  Anterior versus posterior debridement fusion for single-level dorsal tuberculosis: the role of graft-type and level of fixation on determining the outcome , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[20]  Elena García-Gareta,et al.  Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration. , 2015, Bone.

[21]  M. Richardson,et al.  Postoperative Bone Graft Displacement: An Unusual Sign of Infection Following Posterior Spinal Fusion , 2015, Radiology case reports.

[22]  D. Jiang,et al.  Bone plate composed of a ternary nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66/glass fiber composite: biomechanical properties and biocompatibility , 2014, International journal of nanomedicine.

[23]  Yueming Song,et al.  Comparison of anterior cervical fusion by titanium mesh cage versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide cage following single-level corpectomy , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[24]  Mingxing Tang,et al.  One-stage surgical treatment for upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis by internal fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via posterior-only approach , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[25]  D. Jiang,et al.  A hollow cylindrical nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy , 2012, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[26]  S. Rajasekaran Kyphotic deformity in spinal tuberculosis and its management , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[27]  E. Guerado,et al.  Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis. An update , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[28]  Guoyu Lu,et al.  Tissue engineering scaffold material of porous nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 , 2010, International journal of nanomedicine.

[29]  W. Yuan,et al.  Subsidence of Titanium Mesh Cage: A Study Based on 300 Cases , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[30]  D. Jiang,et al.  Application of artificial vertebral body of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 composite in anterior surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. , 2007, Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery.

[31]  A. Siddiqui,et al.  Cage versus tricortical graft for cervical interbody fusion. A prospective randomised study. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Bone‐Graft Harvesting From Iliac and Fibular Donor Sites: Techniques and Complications , 2001, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[33]  J. Brantigan,et al.  A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. , 1993 .

[34]  F Denis,et al.  The Three Column Spine and Its Significance in the Classification of Acute Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries , 1983, Spine.

[35]  Bing Ran 冉 兵,et al.  One-stage surgical treatment for thoracic and lumbar Spinal tuberculosis by transpedicular fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach , 2016, Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences].

[36]  A. Jain Tuberculosis of the spine: a fresh look at an old disease. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[37]  Riew Kd,et al.  The use of titanium mesh cages in the cervical spine. , 2002 .

[38]  R. B. Greer Wolff's Law. , 1993, Orthopaedic review.