Using Actor-Network Theory to Analyze E-Government Implementation in Developing Countries

The implementation issues leading to successful application of information and communication technologies (ICT) is a well-researched area in the information systems literature. But there is little research work of this nature that is theoretically based and undertaken in the field of development informatics/ICT4D. Within this field, an important focus for any theoretically based study could be successful application of ICT in the public sector. This focus is taken in this paper because e-government is regarded by international financing institutions as a core component of the public sector reform programs that are currently reinventing government in developing countries. It is believed that key goals of the good governance agenda—increased efficiency, improved resource management, and increased accountability—will be engendered by the application of ICT. This paper presents actor-network theory (ANT) as a framework for understanding the processes of implementing e-government in developing countries. Drawing particularly on the work of Michel Callon and John Law, it applies this theory to a longitudinal study of the public expenditure management information systems supporting the fiscal reform program in Sri Lanka. Specific findings about the global and local networks that have shaped this set of e-government applications are presented. The conclusion is drawn that the application of ICT is an inherently political process and that a successful outcome requires continuous incremental action and improvisation to address the ongoing issues as they emerge. The paper identifies operational challenges in applying ANT that can be overcome by taking a more comprehensive analytical approach. Overall, ANT is seen as having a potentially wide area of application and being a promising theoretical vehicle for development informatics research.

[1]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[2]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[3]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[4]  Nick Lee,et al.  Otherness and the Actor Network , 1994 .

[5]  M. D. Myers,et al.  A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project , 1994 .

[6]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[7]  Thomas P. Hughes,et al.  The Electrification of America: The System Builders , 2023 .

[8]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Shirin Madon,et al.  The Digital Challenge: Information Technology in the Development Context (Voices in Development Management) , 2004 .

[10]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2020, On Violence.

[11]  J. Law.  After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology , 1999 .

[12]  A. Premchand,et al.  Public expenditure management , 1993 .

[13]  Salvatore Schiavo-Campo,et al.  Managing Government Expenditure , 1999 .

[14]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[15]  Reese V. Jenkins.  Technology and the Market: George Eastman and the Origins of Mass Amateur Photography , 1975 .

[16]  A. Hennion,et al.  La Passion musicale , 1996 .

[17]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  A theory of information systems based on improvisation , 1999 .

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[19]  R. Wade.  Bridging the Digital Divide: New Route to Development or New Form of Dependency? , 2002 .

[20]  Chris Bateman,et al.  Rendering unto Caesar? , 2004, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[21]  B. Latour.  For David Bloor...and beyond: a reply to David Bloor's Anti-Latour. , 1999, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[22]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies , 1992 .

[23]  J. Johnson.  Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer , 1988 .

[24]  C. Avgerou,et al.  Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries , 2001 .

[25]  Eduardo Talero,et al.  Harnessing information for development: A proposal for a world bank group vision and strategy∗ , 1995 .

[26]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[27]  D. Osborne,et al.  Reinventing Government: How the En-trepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector , 1992 .

[28]  S. Bailur.  Using Stakeholder Theory to Analyze Telecenter Projects , 2007 .

[29]  M. Callon.  Actor-Network Theory—The Market Test , 1999 .

[30]  D Pels.  WE HAVE NEVER BEEN MODERN - LATOUR,B , 1995 .

[31]  G. Palsson,et al.  Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives , 2003 .

[32]  劉秋菊,et al.  Actor-Network Theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 2007 .

[33]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Implementing property tax reforms in Bangalore: an actor-network perspective , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[34]  Christine Bellamy,et al.  Introduction: Exploiting IT in Public Administration: Towards the Information Polity? , 1994 .

[35]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[36]  M. Callon.  Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis , 1987 .

[37]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Redefining the social link: from baboons to humans , 1987 .

[38]  S. L. Star,et al.  Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On being Allergic to Onions , 1990 .

[39]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[40]  C. Avgerou.  Information Systems and Global Diversity , 2002 .