SpaK/SpaR Two-component System Characterized by a Structure-driven Domain-fusion Method and in Vitro Phosphorylation Studies

Here we introduce a quantitative structure-driven computational domain-fusion method, which we used to predict the structures of proteins believed to be involved in regulation of the subtilin pathway in Bacillus subtilis, and used to predict a protein-protein complex formed by interaction between the proteins. Homology modeling of SpaK and SpaR yielded preliminary structural models based on a best template for SpaK comprising a dimer of a histidine kinase, and for SpaR a response regulator protein. Our LGA code was used to identify multi-domain proteins with structure homology to both modeled structures, yielding a set of domain-fusion templates then used to model a hypothetical SpaK/SpaR complex. The models were used to identify putative functional residues and residues at the protein-protein interface, and bioinformatics was used to compare functionally and structurally relevant residues in corresponding positions among proteins with structural homology to the templates. Models of the complex were evaluated in light of known properties of the functional residues within two-component systems involving His-Asp phosphorelays. Based on this analysis, a phosphotransferase complexed with a beryllofluoride was selected as the optimal template for modeling a SpaK/SpaR complex conformation. In vitro phosphorylation studies performed using wild type and site-directed SpaK mutant proteins validated the predictions derived from application of the structure-driven domain-fusion method: SpaK was phosphorylated in the presence of 32P-ATP and the phosphate moiety was subsequently transferred to SpaR, supporting the hypothesis that SpaK and SpaR function as sensor and response regulator, respectively, in a two-component signal transduction system, and furthermore suggesting that the structure-driven domain-fusion approach correctly predicted a physical interaction between SpaK and SpaR. Our domain-fusion algorithm leverages quantitative structure information and provides a tool for generation of hypotheses regarding protein function, which can then be tested using empirical methods.

[1]  T. Webb.  The Meteor of March 4 , 1872, Nature.

[2]  Michael T Laub,et al.  Two-Component Signal Transduction Pathways Regulating Growth and Cell Cycle Progression in a Bacterium: A System-Level Analysis , 2005, PLoS biology.

[3]  M. Simon,et al.  Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase , 1999, Cell.

[4]  Gabriela Gonzalez-Bonet,et al.  Reconstruction of the chemotaxis receptor–kinase assembly , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  Jer-Ming Chia,et al.  Implications for domain fusion protein-protein interactions based on structural information , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  R. Russell,et al.  The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  InterPreTS: protein Interaction Prediction through Tertiary Structure , 2003, Bioinform..

[8]  B. Rost,et al.  Protein structures sustain evolutionary drift. , 1997, Folding & design.

[9]  Wayne A Hendrickson,et al.  Structure of the entire cytoplasmic portion of a sensor histidine‐kinase protein , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[10]  J. Hoch,et al.  Multiple histidine kinases regulate entry into stationary phase and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  Emil Alexov,et al.  omology-based modeling of 3 D structures of protein – protein complexes using lignments of modified sequence profiles etras , 2008 .

[12]  E. Marcotte,et al.  Computational genetics: finding protein function by nonhomology methods. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[13]  Weiwen Zhang,et al.  Two-Component Signal Transduction Systems of Desulfovibrio vulgaris: Structural and Phylogenetic Analysis and Deduction of Putative Cognate Pairs , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[14]  Adam J. Smith,et al.  The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. , 1999, Science.

[16]  I. Tsigelny,et al.  The Crystal Structure of Beryllofluoride Spo0F in Complex with the Phosphotransferase Spo0B Represents a Phosphotransfer Pretransition State† , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  C. Chothia,et al.  Determination of protein function, evolution and interactions by structural genomics. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  J. Stock,et al.  The histidine protein kinase superfamily. , 1999, Advances in microbial physiology.

[19]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Computational methods of analysis of protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  Matteo Pellegrini,et al.  Prolinks: a database of protein functional linkages derived from coevolution , 2004, Genome Biology.

[21]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Prediction of physical protein–protein interactions , 2005, Physical biology.

[22]  A. Ninfa,et al.  Protein phosphorylation and regulation of adaptive responses in bacteria. , 1989, Microbiological reviews.

[23]  Michiel Kleerebezem,et al.  Quorum sensing by peptide pheromones and two‐component signal‐transduction systems in Gram‐positive bacteria , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[24]  J. Hansen,et al.  Conversion of Bacillus subtilis 168 to a subtilin producer by competence transformation , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Structure, expression, and evolution of a gene encoding the precursor of nisin, a small protein antibiotic. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  Michael Y. Galperin.  Structural Classification of Bacterial Response Regulators: Diversity of Output Domains and Domain Combinations , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Predicting 3D structures of transient protein-protein complexes by homology. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Structure and expression of a gene encoding the precursor of subtilin, a small protein antibiotic. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[30]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.03154503 References , 2003 .

[31]  J. Hoch,et al.  A transient interaction between two phosphorelay proteins trapped in a crystal lattice reveals the mechanism of molecular recognition and phosphotransfer in signal transduction. , 2000, Structure.

[32]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Hui Lu,et al.  MULTIPROSPECTOR: An algorithm for the prediction of protein–protein interactions by multimeric threading , 2002, Proteins.

[34]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Dynamic mechanism for the autophosphorylation of CheA histidine kinase: molecular dynamics simulations. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[35]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[36]  S. Fields,et al.  Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis , 1995, Microbiological reviews.

[37]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Bacterial response regulators: versatile regulatory strategies from common domains. , 2007, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[38]  Peter Uetz,et al.  MPIDB: the microbial protein interaction database , 2008, Bioinform..

[39]  K. Entian,et al.  Biosynthesis of the lantibiotic subtilin is regulated by a histidine kinase/response regulator system , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[40]  M. Kleerebezem,et al.  Autoregulation of subtilin biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis: the role of the spa-box in subtilin-responsive promoters , 2004, Peptides.

[41]  Adam Zemla,et al.  AS2TS system for protein structure modeling and analysis , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part II. Computational Methods to Predict Protein and Domain Interaction Partners , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  M. Snyder,et al.  Proteomics: Protein complexes take the bait , 2002, Nature.

[45]  K. Entian,et al.  Two Different Lantibiotic-Like Peptides Originate from the Ericin Gene Cluster of Bacillus subtilis A1/3 , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  Y. Pekarsky,et al.  Crystal structure of the worm NitFhit Rosetta Stone protein reveals a Nit tetramer binding two Fhit dimers , 2000, Current Biology.

[47]  Adam Zemla,et al.  LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[48]  J. Stock,et al.  Histidine protein kinases: key signal transducers outside the animal kingdom , 2002, Genome Biology.

[49]  Y. Zhang,et al.  IntAct—open source resource for molecular interaction data , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[50]  M. Murthy,et al.  Crystal structures of ADP and AMPPNP-bound propionate kinase (TdcD) from Salmonella typhimurium: comparison with members of acetate and sugar kinase/heat shock cognate 70/actin superfamily. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  C P Moran,et al.  Spo0A binds to a promoter used by sigma A RNA polymerase during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  D. Kim,et al.  Genomic analysis of the histidine kinase family in bacteria and archaea. , 2001, Microbiology.

[53]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part I. Experimental Techniques and Databases , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  Ian M. Donaldson,et al.  The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database and related tools 2005 update , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[55]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  Improving sequence-based fold recognition by using 3D model quality assessment , 2005, Bioinform..

[56]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.