Aging and Response Selection in Spatial Choice Tasks

Factors that make response selection more difficult, most notably incompatibility between displays and controls, degrade performance. The cost of incompatibility on performance is often much greater for older than for younger adults. To design products that accommodate decreased response selection capabilities of older adults, designers need to understand the specific ways in which response selection processes change with age. The purpose of the present paper is to review research on age-related changes in stimulus-response compatibility and response precuing effects, the two effects that are most directly linked to basic response selection processes. Several specific aspects of response selection that are particularly harmful for older adults' performance are identified. Potential applications of this research include initial guidelines for minimizing the effects of those aspects when designing for older adults.

[1]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Aging and the restructuring of precued movements. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[2]  J. Miller.  Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J R Simon,et al.  Signal processing time as a function of aging. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  W. E. Hick.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[5]  J. Myerson,et al.  The information-loss model: a mathematical theory of age-related cognitive slowing. , 1990, Psychological review.

[6]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility: Editors' introduction , 1997 .

[7]  P. Verhaeghen,et al.  Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[8]  J. Cerella.  Aging and Information-Processing Rate , 1990 .

[9]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Cognitive-Motor Abilities of the Elderly Driver , 1992, Human factors.

[10]  J. R. Simon,et al.  CHOICE REACTION TIME AS A FUNCTION OF ANGULAR STIMULUS-RESPONSE CORRESPONDENCE AND AGE , 1963 .

[11]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[12]  F. Paas,et al.  Effects of age on performance in a finger-precuing task. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  R. L. Deininger,et al.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  J. Richard Simon,et al.  REACTION TIME AND MOVEMENT TIME AS A FUNCTION OF AGE, STIMULUS DURATION, AND TASK DIFFICULTY , 1963 .

[16]  George J. Suci,et al.  Reaction time as a function of stimulus information and age. , 1960 .

[17]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  The enhanced Simon effect for older adults is reduced when the irrelevant location information is conveyed by an accessory stimulus. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[18]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  A Reaction Time Study of Four Control-Display Linkages1 , 1959 .

[19]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Modelling cognitive control in task switching and ageing , 2001 .

[20]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Movement specification time with age. , 1987, Experimental Aging Research.

[21]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  Elements of Human Performance: Reaction Processes and Attention in Human Skill , 1998 .

[22]  N. Meiran,et al.  Old age is associated with a pattern of relatively intact and relatively impaired task-set switching abilities. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[23]  Thierry Hasbroucq,et al.  Stimulus preprocessing, response selection, and motor adjustment in the elderly : An additive factor analysis , 2000 .

[24]  R. Proctor,et al.  Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: Influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[25]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  R. Verleger,et al.  Aging and the Simon task. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus–response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality. , 1996 .

[28]  D. Rosenbaum.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Addie Dutta,et al.  Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  R. Proctor,et al.  Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Roberto Nicoletti,et al.  Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1990 .

[32]  Stephen Griew,et al.  AGE, INFORMATION TRANSMISSION AND THE POSITIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SIGNALS AND RESPONSES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF A CHOICE TASK , 1964 .

[33]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Handbook of human factors and the older adult , 1997 .

[34]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  The influence of age on manual asymmetries in movement preparation and execution , 1995 .

[35]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Preprogramming, programming and reprogramming of aimed hand movements as a function of age. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  Shaffer Lh.  CHOICE REACTION WITH VARIABLE S-R MAPPING. , 1965 .

[37]  Judith M. Ford,et al.  The effect of stimulus-response incompatibility on P3 latency depends on the task but not on age , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[38]  J. Kelso,et al.  Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[40]  J. E. Clark,et al.  The effects of videogame playing on the response selection processing of elderly adults. , 1987, Journal of gerontology.

[41]  L. Shaffer.  CHOICE REACTION WITH VARIABLE S-R MAPPING. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  A. Healy,et al.  Handbook of Psychology, volume 4, Experimental Psychology , 2003 .

[43]  M Perel.  Helping older driversv benefit from in-vehicle technologies , 1998 .

[44]  Christianna S. Williams,et al.  Consequences of driving cessation: decreased out-of-home activity levels. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[45]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  E. Soetens,et al.  Process-Specific Slowing with Advancing Age: Evidence Derived from the Analysis of Sequential Effects , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  J. R. Simon.  Choice reaction time as a function of auditory S-R correspondence, age and sex. , 1967, Ergonomics.

[48]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Age differences in the maintenance and restructuring of movement preparation. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[49]  R. Hyman.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  S. Los,et al.  On the origin of mixing costs: exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials , 1996 .

[51]  J. L. Kenemans,et al.  The effects of sleep loss on task performance and the electroencephalogram in young and elderly subjects , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[52]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  Aging and time-sharing aspects of executive control , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[53]  de Ritske Jong,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[54]  J. R. Simon.  The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[55]  Max Vercruyssen,et al.  Age-Related Slowing, S-R Compatibility, and Stages of Information Processing , 1990 .

[56]  J R Simon,et al.  The effect of aging on the stages of processing in a choice reaction time task. , 1978, Journal of gerontology.

[57]  R. Proctor,et al.  Influence of Irrelevant Information on Human Performance: Effects of S-R Association Strength and Relative Timing , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[58]  P. Salmon,et al.  Comparison of Information-Processing Capacities in Young and Aged Subjects Using Reaction Times , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.

[59]  R. Proctor,et al.  Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[60]  A Kok,et al.  Effects of task complexity in young and old adults: reaction time and P300 latency are not always dissociated. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[61]  D. Kausler.  Experimental psychology, cognition, and human aging , 1982 .