Maximum allowable force on a safety harness cable to discriminate a successful from a failed balance recovery.

A safety harness system is essential to ensure participant safety in experiments at the threshold of balance recovery where avoiding a fall is not always possible. The purpose of this study was to propose a method to determine the maximum allowable force on a safety harness cable to discriminate a successful from a failed balance recovery. Data from 12 younger adults, who participated in experiments to determine the maximum forward lean angles that participants could be suddenly released from and still recover balance using three different limits on the number of steps, were used. For each participant, the coefficients of an asymptotic exponential regression, between the maximum vertical force on the safety harness cable and the initial lean angle at each trial, were evaluated by a least squares method. A proposed threshold for the maximum allowable vertical force of five force constants ensured that the initial lean angle reached 99% of its steady state value with respect to its initial value. It should thus discriminate well a successful (below the threshold) from a failed (above the threshold) balance recovery. Furthermore, although the amplitude of the horizontal forces should not be neglected in safety harness system designs, the contributions of the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior forces can be neglected in experiments at the threshold of balance recovery. Finally, although our five force constants method could be used, the actual value obtained for the maximum allowable vertical force may vary with other safety harness systems and postural perturbations.

[1]  Laura A. Wojcik,et al.  Age differences in using a rapid step to regain balance during a forward fall. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[2]  A B Schultz,et al.  Muscle activities used by young and old adults when stepping to regain balance during a forward fall. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[3]  S. Robinovitch,et al.  The effect of step length on young and elderly women's ability to recover balance. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  C. Schneider,et al.  Factors influencing the quick onset of stepping following postural perturbation. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Laura A. Wojcik,et al.  Age and gender differences in peak lower extremity joint torques and ranges of motion used during single-step balance recovery from a forward fall. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Jeffrey M Schiffman,et al.  Effects of step length on stepping responses used to arrest a forward fall. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[7]  A B Schultz,et al.  Age and gender differences in single-step recovery from a forward fall. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[8]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Journals of Gerontology , 2001 .

[9]  E. T. Hsiao,et al.  Biomechanical influences on balance recovery by stepping. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Y Brenière,et al.  Compensatory reactions in forward fall: are they initiated by stretch receptors? , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Michael L Madigan,et al.  Age and stepping limb performance differences during a single-step recovery from a forward fall. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[12]  Cécile Smeesters,et al.  Kinematics of the threshold of balance recovery are not affected by instructions limiting the number of steps in younger adults. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[13]  Cécile Smeesters,et al.  Instructions limiting the number of steps do not affect the kinetics of the threshold of balance recovery in younger adults. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M C Do,et al.  A biomechanical study of balance recovery during the fall forward. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.