The effectiveness of implementing an electronic health record on diabetes care and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of electronic health record (EHR) implementation on primary care diabetes care. DATA SOURCES Charts were abstracted semi-annually for 14,051 diabetes patients seen in 34 primary care practices in a large, fee-for-service network from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010. The study sample was limited to patients aged 40 years or older. STUDY DESIGN A naturalistic experiment in which GE Centricity Physician Office-EMR 2005 was rolled out over a staggered 3-year schedule. DATA COLLECTION Chart audits were conducted using the AMA/Physician Consortium Adult Diabetes Measure set. The primary outcome was the HealthPartners' "optimal care" measure: HbA1c ≤ 8 percent; LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dl; blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg; not smoking; and documented aspirin use in patients ≥ 40 years of age. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS After adjusting for patient age, sex, and insulin use, patients exposed to the EHR were significantly more likely to receive "optimal care" when compared with unexposed patients (p < .001), with an estimated difference of 9.20 percent (95% CI: 6.08, 12.33) in the final year between exposed patients and patients never exposed. Components of the optimal care bundle showing positive improvement after adjustment were systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <130 mmHg, aspirin prescription, and smoking cessation. Among patients exposed to EHR, all process and outcome measures except HbA1c and lipid control showed significant improvement. CONCLUSION Implementation of a commercially available EHR in primary care practice may improve diabetes care and clinical outcomes.

[1]  Paul L Hebert,et al.  Electronic Health Record Components and the Quality of Care , 2008, Medical care.

[2]  C. Delpierre,et al.  A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  J. Herrin,et al.  Quality of Care of Medicare Patients With Diabetes in a Metropolitan Fee-for-Service Primary Care Integrated Delivery System , 2005, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[4]  R. Cebul,et al.  Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  Mila N. Grossman,et al.  A Tutorial on Activity‐Based Costing of Electronic Health Records , 2010, Quality management in health care.

[8]  Frederick Bloom,et al.  Employing the Electronic Health Record to Improve Diabetes Care: A Multifaceted Intervention in an Integrated Delivery System , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  B. Yawn,et al.  Identifying Persons with Diabetes Using Medicare Claims Data , 1999, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[10]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Electronic Medical Records and Diabetes Quality of Care: Results From a Sample of Family Medicine Practices , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  Allan Donner,et al.  Cluster randomization trials , 2000 .

[12]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Interventions to improve chronic illness care: evaluating their effectiveness. , 2003, Disease management : DM.

[13]  W. Stead Rethinking electronic health records to better achieve quality and safety goals. , 2007, Annual review of medicine.

[14]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial , 2011, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[15]  Qi Li,et al.  Smart Forms: Building Condition-Specific Documentation and Decision Support Tools for Ambulatory EHR , 2005, AMIA.

[16]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[17]  Patrick J O'Connor,et al.  Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[18]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .