The Role of Segmentation in Phonological Processing: An fMRI Investigation

Phonological processes map sound information onto higher levels of language processing and provide the mechanisms by which verbal information can be temporarily stored in working memory. Despite a strong convergence of data suggesting both left lateralization and distributed encoding in the anterior and posterior perisylvian language areas, the nature and brain encoding of phonological subprocesses remain ambiguous. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRT) to investigate the conditions under which anterior (lateral frontal) areas are activated during speech-discrimination tasks that differ in segmental processing demands. In two experiments, subjects performed same/ different judgments on the first sound of pairs of words. In the first experiment, the speech stimuli did not require overt segmentation of the initial consonant from the rest of the word, since the different pairs only varied in the phonetic voicing of the initial consonant (e.g., dip-tip). In the second experiment, the speech stimuli required segmentation since different pairs both varied in initial consonant voicing and contained different vowels and final consonants (e.g., dip-ten). These speech conditions were compared to a tone-discrimination control condition. Behavioral data showed that subjects were highly accurate in both experiments, but revealed different patterns of reaction-time latencies between the two experiments. The imaging data indicated that whereas both speech conditions showed superior temporal activation when compared to tone discrimination, only the second experiment showed consistent evidence of frontal activity. Taken together, the results of Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that phonological processing per se does not necessarily recruit frontal areas. We postulate that frontal activation is a product of segmentation processes in speech perception, or alternatively, working memory demands required for such processing.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[3]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[4]  Hugh W. Buckingham,et al.  Phonological aspects of aphasia , 1981 .

[5]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[6]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[7]  S. Keele,et al.  Does the Cerebellum Provide a Common Computation for Diverse Tasks? A Timing Hypothesis a , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Acoustic Analysis of Speech , 2009 .

[10]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regional response differences within the human auditory cortex when listening to words , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  J. Sergent,et al.  Positron emission tomography study of letter and object processing: empirical findings and methodological considerations. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[14]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[16]  R S Frackowiak,et al.  A PET study of cognitive strategies in normal subjects during language tasks. Influence of phonetic ambiguity and sequence processing on phoneme monitoring. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Theory, simulation, and compensation of physiological motion artifacts in functional MRI , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Brain activity during reading. The effects of exposure duration and task. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[21]  J Jonides,et al.  Human Rehearsal Processes and the Frontal Lobes: PET Evidence , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Cohen,et al.  Spiral K‐space MR imaging of cortical activation , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  M. E. Raichle,et al.  PET Studies of Auditory and Phonological Processing: Effects of Stimulus Characteristics and Task Demands , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  R. J. Zatorre,et al.  PET Studies of Phonological Processing: A Critical Reply to Poeppel , 1996, Brain and Language.

[25]  L. Katz,et al.  Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: review, replication, and reanalysis. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  M. Hallett,et al.  Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects , 1996, Nature.

[28]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[29]  D. Poeppel A Critical Review of PET Studies of Phonological Processing , 1996, Brain and Language.

[30]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  PET Evidence for an Amodal Verbal Working Memory System , 1996, NeuroImage.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Hearing and saying. The functional neuro-anatomy of auditory word processing. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Is developmental dyslexia a disconnection syndrome? Evidence from PET scanning. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[34]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. , 1997, Science.

[35]  I. Daum,et al.  Categorical Speech Perception in Cerebellar Disorders , 1997, Brain and Language.

[36]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[38]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[39]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  5 – Phonological Aspects of Aphasia , 1998 .

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[42]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Role of Parietal Cortex in Verbal Working Memory , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway , 1998, Nature.

[44]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.