“Armpit effect” in an African cichlid fish: self-referent kin recognition in mating decisions of male Pelvicachromis taeniatus

Kin discrimination in nepotistic as well as in sexual contexts is widespread in animals including humans. However, the underlying mechanisms of kin discrimination are assumed to vary between species and—within species—between contexts. During solitary life stages, kin recognition based on social learning is assumed to be less reliable because kin templates that are not continuously updated may get lost. Therefore, self-referent phenotype matching (“armpit effect”), i.e., the comparison of unknown phenotypes with own characteristics, should be particularly relevant when no social cues are available. However, experimental evidence for this mechanism is scarce. Here, we examine self-referent kin recognition in a mate-choice context in adult male Pelvicachromis taeniatus, a socially monogamous cichlid fish from West Africa with biparental brood care and pronounced kin-mating preferences. Juvenile P. taeniatus live in groups, whereas adult males compete for access to breeding sites which they aggressively defend against rivals. Using computer-animated females as standardized visual stimuli in combination with olfactory cues of related and unrelated females, we show that adult males reared isolated from kin since egg stage were able to discriminate sisters from unrelated females. As males could have learned kin cues only from themselves, our study provides evidence for self-referent kin recognition and indicates that the observed inbreeding preferences are mediated by self-derived olfactory cues. Male preferences for sisters were correlated with male body size. We discuss the implications of quality-related mate choice for the evolution of kin-mating preferences.

[1]  A. Pusey,et al.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  William E. Wagner Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  T. Bakker,et al.  You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[4]  J. Mateo,et al.  Kin recognition and the ‘armpit effect’: evidence of self–referent phenotype matching , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  Altruism, Dispersal, and Phenotype‐Matching Kin Recognition , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[6]  A. Canário,et al.  Male urine signals social rank in the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) , 2007, BMC Biology.

[7]  M. Milinski,et al.  Costly major histocompatibility complex signals produced only by reproductively active males, but not females, must be validated by a ‘maleness signal’ in three-spined sticklebacks , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  B. Kempenaers Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory , 2007 .

[9]  Widemo,et al.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  T. Bakker,et al.  Male mate choice scales female ornament allometry in a cichlid fish , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[11]  P. Bressan,et al.  Human kin recognition is self- rather than family-referential , 2009, Biology Letters.

[12]  François‐Xavier Dechaume‐Moncharmont,et al.  Rapid assessment of female preference for male size predicts subsequent choice of spawning partner in a socially monogamous cichlid fish. , 2011, Comptes rendus biologies.

[13]  J. Mateo Recognition systems and biological organization: The perception component of social recognition , 2004 .

[14]  T. Bakker,et al.  Parental investment in relation to offspring quality in the biparental cichlid fish Pelvicachromis taeniatus , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Sex-specific conditional mating preferences in a cichlid fish: implications for sexual conflict , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  H. Kokko,et al.  WHEN NOT TO AVOID INBREEDING , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  R. Dawkins The Extended Phenotype , 1982 .

[20]  P. Sherman,et al.  The Ontogeny of Kin Recognition in Two Species of Ground Squirrels1 , 1982 .

[21]  H. Schielzeth,et al.  Assortative versus disassortative mating preferences of female zebra finches based on self-referent phenotype matching , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  D. Penn,et al.  Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory , 2010 .

[23]  T. Bakker,et al.  Technical Restrictions of Computer-Manipulated Visual Stimuli and Display Units for Studying Animal Behaviour , 2008 .

[24]  J. S. Quinn,et al.  The role of genetic relatedness among social mates in a cooperative breeder , 2008 .

[25]  S. Glémin HOW ARE DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS PURGED? DRIFT VERSUS NONRANDOM MATING , 2003 .

[26]  T. Bakker,et al.  Female nuptial coloration and its adaptive significance in a mutual mate choice system , 2011 .

[27]  Jennifer Small,et al.  Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences , 2006, Current Biology.

[28]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals? , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  P. Sherman,et al.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  A. Ciliberto,et al.  In Vitro FRAP Identifies the Minimal Requirements for Mad2 Kinetochore Dynamics , 2006, Current Biology.

[31]  B. Neff,et al.  Promiscuity Drives Self-Referent Kin Recognition , 2006, Current Biology.

[32]  G. Gerlach,et al.  Kin recognition in zebrafish: a 24-hour window for olfactory imprinting , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  T. Bakker,et al.  Olfactory self-recognition in a cichlid fish , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[34]  J. Hare,et al.  Evidence of self-referent phenotype matching revisited: airing out the armpit effect , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[35]  S. Barrett,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: PURGING THE GENETIC LOAD: A REVIEW OF THE EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  T. Bakker,et al.  Kin discrimination in sticklebacks is mediated by social learning rather than innate recognition , 2007 .

[37]  J. Mateo Self-referent phenotype matching and long-term maintenance of kin recognition , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  S. Winberg,et al.  Learning and sibling odor preference in juvenile arctic char,Salvelinus alpinus (L.) , 1996, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[39]  B. Koop,et al.  Expression of olfactory receptors in different life stages and life histories of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[40]  T. Bakker,et al.  Direct Familiarity Does Not Alter Mating Preference for Sisters in Male Pelvicachromis taeniatus (Cichlidae) , 2007 .

[41]  T. Bakker,et al.  Computer animation as a tool to study preferences in the cichlid Pelvicachromis taeniatus. , 2009, Journal of fish biology.

[42]  J. Schuld,et al.  Size-related inbreeding preference and competitiveness in male Pelvicachromis taeniatus (Cichlidae) , 2011 .

[43]  T. Bakker,et al.  A sex-specific trade-off between mating preferences for genetic compatibility and body size in a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  T. Bakker,et al.  Kin recognition by phenotype matching is family- rather than self-referential in juvenile cichlid fish , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  G. Alexander,et al.  Does the time spent near a male predict female mate choice in a Malawian cichlid , 2001 .

[46]  Deborah Charlesworth,et al.  INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES , 1987 .

[47]  T. Bakker,et al.  Active Inbreeding in a Cichlid Fish and Its Adaptive Significance , 2007, Current Biology.

[48]  T. Bakker,et al.  Microsatellite Support for Active Inbreeding in a Cichlid Fish , 2011, PloS one.