Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users' experience, physiology, performance, and memory

Visual complexity is an apparent feature in website design yet its effects on cognitive and emotional processing are not well understood. The current study examined website complexity within the framework of aesthetic theory and psychophysiological research on cognition and emotion. We hypothesized that increasing the complexity of websites would have a detrimental cognitive and emotional impact on users. In a passive viewing task (PVT) 36 website screenshots differing in their degree of complexity (operationalized by JPEG file size; correlation with complexity ratings in a preliminary study r=.80) were presented to 48 participants in randomized order. Additionally, a standardized visual search task (VST) assessing reaction times, and a one-week-delayed recognition task on these websites were conducted and participants rated all websites for arousal and valence. Psychophysiological responses were assessed during the PVT and VST. Visual complexity was related to increased experienced arousal, more negative valence appraisal, decreased heart rate, and increased facial muscle tension (musculus corrugator). Visual complexity resulted in increased reaction times in the VST and decreased recognition rates. Reaction times in the VST were related to increases in heart rate and electrodermal activity. These findings demonstrate that visual complexity of websites has multiple effects on human cognition and emotion, including experienced pleasure and arousal, facial expression, autonomic nervous system activation, task performance, and memory. It should thus be considered an important factor in website design.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The psychophysiology of emotion. , 1993 .

[2]  C. Rashbass.  Manual of psychophysiological methods: Edited by P. H. Venables and Irene Martin. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1967. ix + 557 pp., 90s , 1967 .

[3]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Cognition and the autonomic nervous system: Orienting, anticipation, and conditioning. , 2000 .

[4]  H. Schlosberg.  The description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  David Doermann,et al.  Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile and ubiquitous multimedia , 2004 .

[6]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Robert D. Ward,et al.  Physiological responses to different WEB page designs , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  B. Parkinson,et al.  Emotion and motivation , 1995 .

[10]  Minna Isomursu,et al.  Experimental evaluation of five methods for collecting emotions in field settings with mobile applications , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation: measuring affective perception. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[12]  P. Lang,et al.  Stimulus repetition and the heart rate response. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships , 2005, CHI.

[14]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  The Structure of Emotion , 2006 .

[15]  P. Venables,et al.  A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods , 1967 .

[16]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  Pupillary responses to emotionally provocative stimuli , 2000, ETRA.

[17]  P. Lang.  Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .

[18]  U. Dimberg.  For Distinguished Early Career Contribution to Psychophysiology: Award Address, 1988 , 1990 .

[19]  Michael Minge,et al.  Measuring multiple components of emotions in interactive contexts , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Waldemar Karwowski.  Cross-Cultural Issues in Human–Computer Interaction , 2006 .

[21]  Don C Donderi,et al.  An Information Theory Analysis of Visual Complexity and Dissimilarity , 2006, Perception.

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  K. Ochsner,et al.  Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[25]  Robert D. Ward,et al.  Affective computing: problems, reactions and intentions , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[26]  John Knight,et al.  Homepage aesthetics: The search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[27]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Stephen H. Fairclough,et al.  Fundamentals of physiological computing , 2009, Interact. Comput..

[29]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[30]  Jonas K. Olofsson,et al.  Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[31]  A Ohman,et al.  Heart-rate and electrodermal orienting responses to visual stimuli differing in complexity. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[32]  R. Krauss,et al.  Facial and autonomic manifestations of the dimensional structure of emotion , 1984 .

[33]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material , 1972 .

[34]  D. C. Donderi,et al.  Compressed file length predicts search time and errors on visual displays , 2005, Displays.

[35]  R K Clifton,et al.  Heart-rate change as a component of the orienting response. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Eva Hudlicka,et al.  To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[37]  P. Lang.  International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[38]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  Frustrating the user on purpose: a step toward building an affective computer , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[39]  Richard L. Hazlett,et al.  Measurement of user frustration: a biologic approach , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[40]  T. A. Williams,et al.  Technology in mental health care delivery systems , 1980 .

[41]  U Dimberg,et al.  Facial electromyography and emotional reactions. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[42]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[43]  Sascha Mahlke,et al.  Studying antecedents of emotional experiences in interactive contexts , 2007, CHI.

[44]  R. Watson,et al.  The Influence of Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent , 2006 .

[45]  Leena Arhippainen,et al.  Utilizing context-awareness in office-type working life , 2004, MUM '04.

[46]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Webpage Background and Viewer Attitudes , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[47]  Emmanouil Riglis,et al.  Second Year PhD Report Research Title Modelling Visual Complexity in Image Architectures By : Emmanouil Riglis , 2022 .

[48]  W. Karwowski.  International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors , 2001 .

[49]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[50]  A. J. Fridlund,et al.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[51]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  The effects of affective interventions in human-computer interaction , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[52]  D. Berlyne.  Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .