CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus

The Insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) and H19 genes are imprinted, resulting in silencing of the maternal and paternal alleles, respectively. This event is dependent upon an imprinted-control region two kilobases upstream of H19 (refs 1, 2). On the paternal chromosome this element is methylated and required for the silencing of H19 (refs 2,3,4). On the maternal chromosome the region is unmethylated and required for silencing of the Igf2 gene 90 kilobases upstream. We have proposed that the unmethylated imprinted-control region acts as a chromatin boundary that blocks the interaction of Igf2 with enhancers that lie 3′ of H19 (refs 5, 6). This enhancer-blocking activity would then be lost when the region was methylated, thereby allowing expression of Igf2 paternally. Here we show, using transgenic mice and tissue culture, that the unmethylated imprinted-control regions from mouse and human H19 exhibit enhancer-blocking activity. Furthermore, we show that CTCF, a zinc finger protein implicated in vertebrate boundary function, binds to several sites in the unmethylated imprinted-control region that are essential for enhancer blocking. Consistent with our model, CTCF binding is abolished by DNA methylation. This is the first example, to our knowledge, of a regulated chromatin boundary in vertebrates.

[1]  C. Auffray,et al.  Purification of mouse immunoglobulin heavy-chain messenger RNAs from total myeloma tumor RNA. , 2005, European journal of biochemistry.

[2]  Victor V Lobanenkov,et al.  Negative protein 1, which is required for function of the chicken lysozyme gene silencer in conjunction with hormone receptors, is identical to the multivalent zinc finger repressor CTCF , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[3]  M. Pazin,et al.  An enhancer deletion affects both H19 and Igf2 expression. , 1995, Genes & development.

[4]  A. West,et al.  The Protein CTCF Is Required for the Enhancer Blocking Activity of Vertebrate Insulators , 1999, Cell.

[5]  A. Bird,et al.  Sp1 sites in the mouse aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island. , 1994, Genes & development.

[6]  D. Kaiser,et al.  Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. , 1993, Genes & development.

[7]  S. Tilghman,et al.  The structural H19 gene is required for transgene imprinting. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  O. Hagenbüchle,et al.  A rapid method for the isolation of DNA-binding proteins from purified nuclei of tissues and cells in culture. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  S. Tilghman,et al.  Disruption of imprinting caused by deletion of the H19 gene region in mice , 1995, Nature.

[10]  A. Bird,et al.  Methylation-Induced Repression— Belts, Braces, and Chromatin , 1999, Cell.

[11]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  A 5' differentially methylated sequence and the 3'-flanking region are necessary for H19 transgene imprinting , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[12]  Paul Schedl,et al.  A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains , 1991, Cell.

[13]  Z. Siegfried,et al.  Spl elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation , 1994, Nature.

[14]  R. Feil,et al.  Genomic imprinting in mammals: an interplay between chromatin and DNA methylation? , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[15]  P. Neiman,et al.  An exceptionally conserved transcriptional repressor, CTCF, employs different combinations of zinc fingers to bind diverged promoter sequences of avian and mammalian c-myc oncogenes , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  R. Kellum,et al.  A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[17]  M. Azim Surani,et al.  Parental-origin-specific epigenetic modification of the mouse H19 gene , 1993, Nature.

[18]  Shirley M. Tilghman,et al.  Location of enhancers is essential for the imprinting of H19 and Igf2 genes , 1998, Nature.

[19]  S. Tilghman,et al.  Chromatin conformation of the H19 epigenetic mark. , 1998, Human molecular genetics.

[20]  P. Neiman,et al.  Negative Transcriptional Regulation Mediated by Thyroid Hormone Response Element 144 Requires Binding of the Multivalent Factor CTCF to a Novel Target DNA Sequence* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  J. Hornberg,et al.  A potential imprint control element: identification of a conserved 42 bp sequence upstream of H19. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[22]  R. Gregory,et al.  Parental Allele-Specific Chromatin Configuration in a Boundary–Imprinting-Control Element Upstream of the MouseH19 Gene , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  G. Pfeifer,et al.  Characterization of Novel Parent-Specific Epigenetic Modifications Upstream of the Imprinted Mouse H19Gene , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene , 2000, Nature.

[25]  S. Elgin,et al.  Chromatin boundaries: Punctuating the genome , 1998, Current Biology.

[26]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  Role of a 461-bp G-rich repetitive element in H19 transgene imprinting , 1999, Development Genes and Evolution.

[27]  A. Vostrov,et al.  The zinc finger protein CTCF binds to the APBbeta domain of the amyloid beta-protein precursor promoter. Evidence for a role in transcriptional activation. , 1997, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  Deletion of the H19 differentially methylated domain results in loss of imprinted expression of H19 and Igf2. , 1998, Genes & development.