Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes

In a visual search task, targets containing elementary features are detected in parallel, while a serial search is necessary for the detection of a target without a feature, or for targets containing conjunctions of features. In this study, we re-investigated the role of practice in visual search tasks, using an uncued visual search paradigm. Under some circumstances, initially serial tasks can become parallel with practice. Perceptual learning of feature search tasks is rapid (a few hundreds of trials are sufficient to transform serial into parallel search), long-lasting (a learned task is retained over several months), but far less specific than learning of other visual tasks (see also Sireteanu & Rettenbach, 1995a [Vision Research, 35, 2037-2043]). Learning transfers from one task to another, from one location in the visual field to another, and between the two eyes of a given subject, even if the subject has reduced stereopsis. Search for a conjunction of orientation and colour becomes more efficient, suggesting that a different search strategy emerges after prolonged practice. These results suggest that learning of visual search tasks modifies neural structures located at a high level in the visual pathway, involving different, presumably more central neural circuits, than the learning of visual discriminations and hyperacuity.

[1]  T. Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[3]  D. Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning in parafoveal vision , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Preattentive Processes Guide Visual Search: Evidence from Patients with Unilateral Visual Neglect , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  R T Knight,et al.  Cortical substrates supporting visual search in humans. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  On the perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[7]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[8]  J. Intriligator,et al.  Perceptual Learning of Orientation Discrimination by More Than One Attribute , 1997, Vision Research.

[9]  G. Orban,et al.  The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgments , 1985, Vision Research.

[10]  A. Karni,et al.  Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill. , 1994, Science.

[11]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Increased Cortical Representation of the Fingers of the Left Hand in String Players , 1995, Science.

[13]  G. Orban,et al.  Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  M. Fahle.  Human Pattern Recognition: Parallel Processing and Perceptual Learning , 1994, Perception.

[15]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Properties, Parts, and Objects , 1986 .

[16]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Learning Pop-out Detection: Specificities to Stimulus Characteristics , 1996, Vision Research.

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  Emergent features, attention, and object perception. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Curvature is a Basic Feature for Visual Search Tasks , 1992, Perception.

[19]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[20]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual Search for Feature and Conjunction Targets with an Attention Deficit , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[24]  E. Gibson.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[25]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  What is learned in visual search - local brightness contrast or unique visual attributes? , 1997 .

[26]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[27]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search: Fast, enduring, but non-specific , 1995, Vision Research.

[28]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual Search Performance in the Neglect Syndrome , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  R Klein,et al.  Search performance without eye movements , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  H. Nothdurft.  Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search , 1993, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  D. Tanné,et al.  Perceptual learning: learning to see , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Learning in grating waveform discrimination: Specificity for orientation and spatial frequency , 1981, Vision Research.

[34]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[35]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[36]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system , 1994, Nature.

[37]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Squint‐induced Modification of Visual Receptive Field in the Lateral Suprasylvian Cortex of the Cat: Binocul Interaction, Vertical Effect and Anomalous Correspondence , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[39]  A Fiorentini,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer of visual information in humans: spatial characteristics. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Binocular interaction in the peripheral visual field of humans with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia , 1981, Vision Research.

[41]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[43]  Adriana Fiorentini,et al.  Differences between fovea and parafovea in visual search processes , 1989, Vision Research.

[44]  H. Nothdurft.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal plasticity that underlies improvement in perceptual performance. , 1994, Science.

[46]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  A. Karni.  The acquisition of perceptual and motor skills: a memory system in the adult human cortex. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  U NEISSER,et al.  Searching for Ten Targets Simultaneously , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[49]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  Parallel perception of vernier offsets, curvature, and chevrons in humans , 1991, Vision Research.

[51]  Charles Weissmann,et al.  The structure of one of the eight or more distinct chromosomal genes for human interferon-α , 1980, Nature.

[52]  R. Srebro,et al.  Event-related potential scalp fields during parallel and serial visual searches. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[53]  L. Vaina,et al.  Learning to ignore: psychophysics and computational modeling of fast learning of direction in noisy motion stimuli. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  S B Steinman,et al.  Serial and Parallel Search in Pattern Vision? , 1987, Perception.

[55]  S. Edelman,et al.  Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback , 1993, Vision Research.

[56]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Attentional control of early perceptual learning. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[58]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[59]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  Parallel, semiparallel, and serial processing of visual hyperacuity , 1990, Other Conferences.

[60]  U. Leonards,et al.  Parallel visual search is not always effortless. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[61]  D. Scott.  Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[62]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[63]  S J Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[65]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[66]  A Fiorentini,et al.  Visual perceptual learning: a sign of neural plasticity at early stages of visual processing. , 1997, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[67]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[68]  M Fahle,et al.  A new elementary feature of vision. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[69]  D. Glaser,et al.  Initial performance, learning and observer variability for hyperacuity tasks , 1993, Vision Research.

[70]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention-Related Modulation of Sensory-Evoked Brain Activity in a Visual Search Task , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar,et al.  Perceptual learning in seeing form from motion , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[73]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search , 1993, Nature.

[74]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[75]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[76]  N J Wade,et al.  On Interocular Transfer of the Movement Aftereffect in Individuals with and without Normal Binocular Vision , 1976, Perception.

[77]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system , 1996, Nature.

[78]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.