Frameless Stereotactic Biopsy with Intraoperative Computed Tomography “Assessment of Efficacy and Real Target Registration Error”

Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy (FSB) with navigation system has been widely used. We reported preliminary experience of FSB with intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) and examined the usefulness of this novel adjuvant technique and real target registration error (rTRE) of FSB. The FSB with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and iCT was performed on 10 patients. The gadolinium-enhanced lesions on magnetic resonance image were defined as the biopsy target. In the procedure, iCTs were scanned twice, for autoregistration of the navigation system and for confirmation of the position of the actual inserted biopsy needle. The red fluorescence of the samples was observed under excitation with violet-blue light through a low-cut filter of neurosurgical microscope. The distance between the planned target and the tip of the biopsy needle in the image of iCT was calculated in a workstation for the assessment of rTRE. The median volume of the target was 12.13 mL (0.06-39.15 mL). We performed the surgical procedure in a prone position in four patients. None to faint 5-ALA-induced fluorescence was observed in six samples. There existed no sampling errors. The mean target distance between the planned and real targets of the mean rTRE of FSB was 2.7 ± 0.56 mm. The real TRE of FSB was first reported and was larger than the reported rTRE exactly calculated from the fiducial registration error. iCT guarantees accurate tumor sampling with autoregistration regardless of the surgical position and prevents inaccurate biopsy to occur even with ALA fluorescence assistance.

[1]  A. Sharan,et al.  Robot-Assisted Stereotaxy Reduces Target Error: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of 6056 Trajectories. , 2020, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Miriam H. A. Bopp,et al.  Reliable navigation registration in cranial and spine surgery based on intraoperative computed tomography. , 2019, Neurosurgical focus.

[3]  K. Kawai,et al.  Application of Augmented Reality to Stereotactic Biopsy , 2019, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[4]  Miriam H. A. Bopp,et al.  Intraoperative computed tomography as reliable navigation registration device in 200 cranial procedures , 2018, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[5]  M. Preusser,et al.  5-ALA-induced fluorescence as a marker for diagnostic tissue in stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lymphomas: experience in 41 patients. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.

[6]  J. Vrána,et al.  Accuracy of VarioGuide Frameless Stereotactic System Against Frame-Based Stereotaxy: Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[7]  J. Elder,et al.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided frameless stereotactic brain biopsy: technical note. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  P. Woerdeman,et al.  Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsies: emphasis on diagnostic yield , 2014, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[9]  W. Jarmundowicz,et al.  The safety and effectiveness of low field intraoperative MRI guidance in frameless stereotactic biopsies of brain tumours—design and interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial , 2013, Neurosurgical Review.

[10]  Boguslaw Tomanek,et al.  Strong 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence is a novel intraoperative marker for representative tissue samples in stereotactic brain tumor biopsies , 2012, Neurosurgical Review.

[11]  Kimito Yamada,et al.  Use of 5-aminolevulinic acid for the confirmation of deep-seated brain tumors during stereotactic biopsy. Report of 2 cases. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  A. Belli,et al.  Image-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy without intraoperative neuropathological examination. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  Johan M. Kros,et al.  Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre , 2010, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[14]  Jay B. West,et al.  Fiducial Point Placement and the Accuracy of Point-based, Rigid Body Registration , 2001, Neurosurgery.