Open Scientific Entrepreneurship: How the Open Source Paradigm Can Foster Entrepreneurial Activities in Scientific Institutions

The objective of this article is to conceptually transfer the concept of open source software OSS development to scientific entrepreneurship and to hypothetically discuss the support potentials of this rather new development philosophy for what we than call open scientific entrepreneurship. Therefore, at first the authors will go into conceptual details of scientific entrepreneurship and than of OSS development. Following, the main thrust of the article presents open scientific entrepreneurship from two points of origin: first of all, OSS development as a specific form of scientific e-entrepreneurship and further on potential benefits of opening "traditional" scientific entrepreneurship up by looking at specific action fields. These action fields are theoretically based on the process and competence perspective of scientific entrepreneurship. Finally, the general benefits as well as downsides of the concept of openness are discussed on a generic level. It becomes obvious that there is need for balancing the tensions between an open and closed design pattern for scientific entrepreneurship with a general emphasis on the open design perspective.

[1]  Saras D. Sarasvathy,et al.  Effectuation , 2008 .

[2]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[3]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science , 2002 .

[4]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[5]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[6]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[7]  John Gallaugher,et al.  Understanding Network Effects in Software Markets: Evidence from Web Server Pricing , 2002, MIS Q..

[8]  Joel West,et al.  The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities , 2008 .

[9]  J. West,et al.  Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software , 2006 .

[10]  Diether Gebert,et al.  The Open and the Closed Corporation as Conflicting forms of Organization , 1999 .

[11]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[12]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[13]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSING AND THE INTENSITY OF AGGREGATE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Merging the metaphors for organizational improvement: Business process reengineering as a component of organizational learning , 1995 .

[16]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[17]  Linus Dahlander.  Penguin in a new suit: a tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities , 2007 .

[18]  Pierre R. Dasen,et al.  Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications , 1992 .

[19]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances: Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships? , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Niels Noorderhaven,et al.  External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific Integrated Circuits Industry , 2002 .

[21]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[22]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[23]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[24]  Bernard L. Simonin.  An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[25]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[26]  K. Popper.  The high tide of prophecy : Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath , 1945 .

[27]  Stefano De Paoli,et al.  Free and Open Source Licenses in Community Life: Two Empirical Cases , 2008, First Monday.

[28]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[29]  J. C. F. D. Arroyabe,et al.  The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2008 .

[30]  Daniel H. Kim.  The Link between individual and organizational learning , 1997 .

[31]  H.F.O. VonKortzfleisch,et al.  Organizational impact of information technology (IT) in the context of e-business: development of a general framework for balancing the tensions between opportunities and risks , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[32]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[33]  Klaus Anderseck,et al.  Institutional and academic entrepreneurship: implications for university governance and management , 2004 .

[34]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects , 2002 .

[35]  von HippelEric.  "Sticky Information" and the Locus of Problem Solving , 1994 .

[36]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[37]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets , 2006 .

[38]  Irwin Feller,et al.  Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can , 1990 .

[39]  Christine Volkmann,et al.  Development and Prospects of Academic Entrepreneurship Education in Germany , 2006 .

[40]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical analysis , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[41]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[42]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Measuring open source software success , 2009 .

[43]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[44]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances , 2005 .

[45]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[46]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation , 2008 .

[47]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[48]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Online Communities and Open Innovation , 2008 .

[49]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  An Analysis of Open Source Business Models , 2005 .

[50]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  The open source software phenomenon: Characteristics that promote research , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[52]  Pontus Braunerhjelm,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship. Social Norms, University Culture and Policies , 2007 .

[53]  A. Link,et al.  Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , 2003 .

[54]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change , 1994 .

[55]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Robert Redfield,et al.  MEMORANDUM FOR THE STUDY OF ACCULTURATION , 1936 .

[59]  Hugh M. Pattinson,et al.  E-Novation for Competitive Advantage in Collaborative Globalization: Technologies for Emerging E-Business Strategies , 2011 .

[60]  Margit Osterloh,et al.  Open Source Software Development - Just Another Case of Collective Invention? , 2004 .

[61]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  R&D, knowledge spillovers and company productivity performance , 2009 .

[63]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Marinela Mircea.  Building the Agile Enterprise with Service-Oriented Architecture, Business Process Management and Decision Management , 2011, Int. J. E Entrepreneurship Innov..

[65]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[66]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[67]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[68]  Federico Iannacci,et al.  Coordination processes in open source software development: the Linux case study , 2005 .

[69]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[70]  Karl H. Vesper,et al.  Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education , 1997 .

[71]  Jürgen Bitzer,et al.  Intrinsic motivation in open source software development , 2007 .

[72]  T. Allen,et al.  Universities and Technology Transfer: A Review of Academic Entrepreneurship Literature , 2004 .

[73]  R. Geiger.  Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II , 1994 .

[74]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[75]  James H. Gerlach,et al.  An empirical analysis of open source software developers' motivations and continuance intentions , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[76]  Mark de Rond,et al.  On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances , 2004, Organ. Sci..