How Quickly Should a Communication Robot Respond? Delaying Strategies and Habituation Effects

This paper reports a study about system response time (SRT) in communication robots that utilize human-like social features, such as anthropomorphic appearance and conversation in natural language. Our research purpose is to establish SRT design guidelines in communication robots. The first experiment observed user preferences toward different SRTs in interactions with a robot which indicated that user SRT preferences in a communication robot are peak at one-second SRT.Based on the results of the first experiment, we conducted two further SRT investigations. One is for delaying strategy and we propose conversational filler which is a behavior that notifies listeners that the robot intends to respond. The other is for habituation effect to see the trend of the first experiment’s result will remain or not when using robots in daily life. In both investigations, we addressed how the delaying strategy and the habituation effect affect on SRT preferences.

[1]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  T. Takenaka,et al.  The development of Honda humanoid robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[3]  C. Garvey,et al.  Timing and turn taking in children's conversations 1 , 1981 .

[4]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Preliminary Field Trial for Teleoperated Communication Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  Fumihide Tanaka,et al.  Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments , 2006, HRI '06.

[6]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[7]  Tomio Watanabe,et al.  Time Lag Effects of Utterance to Communicative Actions on CG Character-Human Greeting Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[8]  B. Shneiderman Designing the User Interface (3rd Ed.) , 1998 .

[9]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  AIBO: Toward the Era of Digital Creatures , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Planning and the user interface: the effects of lockout time and error recovery cost , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Hideki Kozima,et al.  Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[12]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Keikichi Hirose,et al.  Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of following phrases , 2005, INTERSPEECH.

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing The User Interface , 2013 .

[15]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[16]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Interactions with a moody robot , 2006, HRI '06.

[17]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[18]  Kikuo Fujimura,et al.  The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Behaviour delay and robot expressiveness in child-robot interactions: A user study on interaction kinesics , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  An overview of human interactive robots for psychological enrichment , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  StarnerThad The Challenges of Wearable Computing , 2001 .

[22]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effect of a robot on user perceptions , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[23]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[24]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Rhythms of dialogue , 1970 .

[25]  Thomas J. Goodman,et al.  The effect of System Response Time on interactive computer aided problem solving , 1978, SIGGRAPH.

[26]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  A humanoid robot that pretends to listen to route guidance from a human , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[27]  M. Yamamoto,et al.  Timing control effects of utterance to communicative actions on embodied interaction with a robot , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[28]  Jan L. Guynes Impact of system response time on state anxiety , 1988, CACM.

[29]  Carole Edelsky Who's got the floor? , 1981, Language in Society.

[30]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  System response time operator productivity, and job satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[31]  R. Power,et al.  Some criticisms of Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson on turn taking , 1986 .

[32]  A. Green,et al.  Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[33]  Thad Starner The Challenges of Wearable Computing: Part 2 , 2001, IEEE Micro.

[34]  Robert B. Miller,et al.  Response time in man-computer conversational transactions , 1899, AFIPS Fall Joint Computing Conference.

[35]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[36]  Alois Knoll,et al.  The roles of haptic-ostensive referring expressions in cooperative, task-based human-robot dialogue , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[37]  Margaret McLaughlin,et al.  Conversation: How Talk Is Organized , 1984 .

[38]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Humanlike conversation with gestures and verbal cues based on a three-layer attention-drawing model , 2006, Connect. Sci..