Reliability and Validity of Two Instruments Designed to Assess the Walking and Bicycling Suitability of Sidewalks and Roads

Purpose. Public health professionals hypothesize that when community environments provide suitable walking and bicycling conditions, community members will be more active. Measurement indicators and assessment instruments are needed to evaluate suitability. This study determined the reliability and validity of two instruments to assess the suitability of sidewalks for walking and roads for bicycling. Methods. Two data collectors used walking and bicycling suitability assessment instruments to collect data on 31 road segments. In addition, three transportation experts used a 7-point Likert response system to subjectively evaluate walking and bicycling conditions for the same segments. Intraclass correlations determined the reliability of each assessment instrument and the reliability of the Likert response system. Pearson correlations (research staff assessments with expert assessments) were calculated to determine the criterion-related validity of the suitability measures. Results. Intercoder reliability (intraclass) correlations for the walking and bicycling assessment instruments were r = .79 and .90, respectively. Intercoder reliability of the experts' Likert response system was r = .73 for the walking form and r = .77 for the bicycling form. Criterion-related validity (Pearson) correlations for the walking and bicycling assessment instruments were r = .58 and .62, respectively. Conclusion. Although some variables have lower reliability and validity than is ideal, the walking and bicycling suitability assessment instruments appear promising as instruments for community members and professionals to systematically assess key aspects of the physical environment.

[1]  Bruce Epperson,et al.  EVALUATING SUITABILITY OF ROADWAYS FOR BICYCLE USE: TOWARD A CYCLING LEVEL-OF-SERVICE STANDARD , 1994 .

[2]  Andrea L Dunn,et al.  Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: a study examining walking to work. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Bruce W Landis,et al.  BICYCLE INTERACTION HAZARD SCORE: A THEORETICAL MODEL , 1994 .

[4]  A. King.  Community and public health approaches to the promotion of physical activity. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Richard P Troiano,et al.  The association between urban form and physical activity in U.S. adults. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[6]  R. Pate,et al.  Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[7]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Donald W. Reinfurt,et al.  THE BICYCLE COMPATIBILITY INDEX: A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT, IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL , 1998 .

[9]  Susan L Handy,et al.  How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[11]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[12]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  How Land Use and Transportation Systems Impact Public Health , 2000 .

[13]  A. Bauman,et al.  Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  Michael J. Greenwald,et al.  The Built Environment as a Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Non-Work Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon , 2001 .

[15]  D. Stokols.  Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion , 1996, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[16]  Shawn Turner.  BICYCLE SUITABILITY CRITERIA FOR STATE ROADWAYS IN TEXAS. , 1997 .

[17]  Thomas Walsh,et al.  BICYCLE STRESS LEVEL AS A TOOL TO EVALUATE URBAN AND SUBURBAN BICYCLE COMPATIBILITY , 1994 .

[18]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Physical activity & behavioral medicine , 1999 .

[19]  M. Pratt,et al.  Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[20]  Bruce W Landis,et al.  Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment: Pedestrian Level of Service , 2001 .

[21]  S M Turner,et al.  BICYCLE SUITABILITY CRITERIA: LITERATURE REVIEW AND STATE-OF-THE-PRACTICE SURVEY , 1997 .

[22]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Built Environment as Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Nonwork Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon , 2001 .

[23]  N. Owen,et al.  Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  Task Force on Community Preventive Services.  Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  Venkat R. Vattikuti,et al.  Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service , 1997 .

[26]  Donald W. Reinfurt,et al.  Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index , 1996 .

[27]  A. King,et al.  Forging trandisciplinary bridges to meet the physical inactivity challenge in the 21st century , 2002 .

[28]  A. King,et al.  Theoretical approaches to the promotion of physical activity: forging a transdisciplinary paradigm. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[29]  D Burden,et al.  Street Design Guidelines for Healthy Neighborhoods , 2000 .

[30]  K. Shriver.  Influence of Environmental Design on Pedestrian Travel Behavior in Four Austin Neighborhoods , 1997 .

[31]  Linda B. Dixon.  Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems , 1996 .

[32]  R. Brownson,et al.  Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[33]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .