Emulation and interpretation of high-dimensional climate model outputs

Running complex computer models can be expensive in computer time, while learning about the relationships between input and output variables can be difficult. An emulator is a fast approximation to a computationally expensive model that can be used as a surrogate for the model, to quantify uncertainty or to improve process understanding. Here, we examine emulators based on singular value decompositions (SVDs) and use them to emulate global climate and vegetation fields, examining how these fields are affected by changes in the Earth's orbit. The vegetation field may be emulated directly from the orbital variables, but an appealing alternative is to relate it to emulations of the climate fields, which involves high-dimensional input and output. The SVDs radically reduce the dimensionality of the input and output spaces and are shown to clarify the relationships between them. The method could potentially be useful for any complex process with correlated, high-dimensional inputs and/or outputs.

[1]  Philip B. Holden,et al.  Precessional forcing of tropical vegetation carbon storage , 2011 .

[2]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[3]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  Worldwide impacts of climate change on energy for heating and cooling , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[4]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[5]  P. B. Holden,et al.  Dimensionally reduced emulation of an AOGCM for application to integrated assessment modelling , 2010 .

[6]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[7]  W. Berger,et al.  On the Milankovitch sensitivity of the Quaternary deep-sea record , 2013 .

[8]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[9]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[10]  Claudia Tebaldi,et al.  Pattern scaling: Its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations , 2014, Climatic Change.

[11]  Heiko Jansen,et al.  The Planet Simulator: Towards a user friendly model , 2005 .

[12]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[13]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Deep Gaussian Processes , 2012, AISTATS.

[14]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[15]  Kevin I. C. Oliver,et al.  Controls on the spatial distribution of oceanic δ 13 C DIC , 2012 .

[16]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[17]  N. Edwards,et al.  The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector , 2013, 1309.7626.

[18]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[19]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  PLASIM-ENTSem v1.0: a spatio-temporal emulator of future climate change for impacts assessment , 2013 .

[20]  Timothy M. Lenton,et al.  An efficient numerical terrestrial scheme (ENTS) for Earth system modelling , 2006 .

[21]  André Berger,et al.  Long-Term Variations of Caloric Insolation Resulting from the Earth's Orbital Elements , 1978, Quaternary Research.

[22]  Marc Vielle,et al.  Physical and Economic Consequences of Sea-Level Rise: A Coupled GIS and CGE Analysis Under Uncertainties , 2016 .