Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures with Cephalomedullary Nails: Single Head Screw vs. Dual Integrated Compression Screw Systems

Extracapsular hip fractures are very common in the elderly. They are mainly treated surgically with an intramedullary nail. Nowadays, both endomedullary hip nails with single cephalic screw systems and interlocking double screw systems are available on the market. The latter are supposed to increase rotational stability and therefore decrease the risk of collapse and cut-out. A retrospective cohort study was carried out, in which 387 patients with extracapsular hip fracture undergoing internal fixation with an intramedullary nail were included to study the occurrence of complications and reoperations. Of the 387 patients, 69% received a single head screw nail and 31% received a dual integrated compression screw nail. The median follow-up was 1.1 years, and in that time, a total of 17 reoperations were performed (4.2%; 2.1% for single head screw nails vs. 8.7% for double head screws). According to the multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex and basicervical fracture, the adjusted hazard risk of reoperation required was 3.6 times greater when using double interlocking screw systems (p = 0.017). A propensity scores analysis confirmed this finding. In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of using two interlocking head screw systems and the increased risk of reoperation in our single center, we encourage to other researchers to explore this question in a wider multicenter study.

[1]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants , 2022, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[2]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Stabilisation of AO OTA 31-A unstable proximal femoral fractures: Does the choice of intramedullary nail affect the incidence of post-operative complications? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. , 2022, Injury.

[3]  A. Bolina,et al.  Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes in intertrochanteric fractures treated with InterTAN nail against conventional cephalomedullary nails: a systematic review , 2020, Future science OA.

[4]  A. Ntouba,et al.  Risk factors and mortality of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a one-year follow-up study , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Guangrong Ji,et al.  Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis , 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[6]  A. Kaya,et al.  Comparison of Third Generation Proximal Femoral Nails in Treatment of Reverse Oblique Intertrochanteric Fractures , 2019, Bezmialem Science.

[7]  W. Ricci,et al.  Are Two-Part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures Stable and does Stability Depend on Fixation Method? , 2019, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  R. Sanders,et al.  Biomechanical Investigation of an Integrated 2-Screw Cephalomedullary Nail Versus a Sliding Hip Screw in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures , 2019, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  Xinchao Zhang,et al.  Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis , 2018, Journal of International Medical Research.

[10]  P. Trueman,et al.  Comparison of a twin interlocking derotation and compression screw cephalomedullary nail (InterTAN) with a single screw derotation cephalomedullary nail (proximal femoral nail antirotation): a systematic review and meta-analysis for intertrochanteric fractures , 2018, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[11]  N. Zhang,et al.  A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: a minimum follow-up of 3 years , 2017, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[12]  J. Rueger,et al.  Five-Year Outcome Analysis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing a 2-Screw and a Single-Screw Cephalomedullary Nail , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[13]  H. Su,et al.  A randomized prospective comparison of Intertan and Gamma 3 for treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures , 2016 .

[14]  M. Chehade,et al.  Influence of Fracture Stability on Early Patient Mortality and Reoperation After Pertrochanteric and Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  H.T. Xu,et al.  Proximal femoral nails antirotation, Gamma nails, and dynamic hip screws for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of femur: A meta-analysis. , 2014, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[16]  P. Myint,et al.  Pre-operative indicators for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Age and ageing.

[17]  S. Zhang,et al.  InterTan nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. , 2013, Orthopedics.

[18]  F. Aubrun [Hip fracture surgery in the elderly patient: epidemiological data and risk factors]. , 2011, Annales Francaise d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation.

[19]  H. Handoll,et al.  Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  H. Handoll,et al.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.