Cross-Sectional Area and Muscular Strength

A brief review is provided on the relationship of strength to muscle crosssectional area (CSA). It is commonly believed that maximal force and CSA are strongly related. Studies examining varying levels of training status display discordant data suggesting complex relationships between training status, CSA and peak force. It has been reported that trained participants had a significantly larger force to CSA ratio (F/CSA) than untrained males and females. Therefore, it is difficult to attribute all force changes due to training to CSA changes. In general, studies of CSA and strength suggest that sex differences may exist. For example, recreationally trained female weightlifters produced higher F/CSA than males at lower velocities of contraction. Definitive conclusions regarding sex differences, force production and CSA are difficult because of limited studies and equivocal results among these studies. Some studies have also examined the impact of aging on F/CSA. These studies seem to follow the same pattern as studies on sex differences and training status, with data suggesting that F/CSA varies unpredictably across ages and that differences may be attributed to factors other than age alone. In the papers reviewed, the relationship between force and CSA is neither consistent nor simple. Although some of the discrepancies between studies could be attributed to methodological variations, this does not seem likely to explain all differences. The F/CSA relationship seems complex, and future studies are required to elucidate the relationships among key factors in the expression of strength.

[1]  M Stokes,et al.  The size and strength of the quadriceps muscles of old and young men. , 1985, Clinical physiology.

[2]  R. Maughan,et al.  Relationships between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area in male sprinters and endurance runners , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[3]  T. Fukunaga calculation of Muscle Strength per Unit Cross-Sectional Area of Human Muscle by Means of Ultrasonic Measurement , 1969 .

[4]  Strength conditioning in older men: skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improved function. , 1988 .

[5]  E. Metter,et al.  High-volume, heavy-resistance strength training and muscle damage in young and older women. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  T J Doherty,et al.  The influence of aging and sex on skeletal muscle mass and strength , 2001, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[7]  B. M. Moss,et al.  Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads on dynamic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power and load-velocity relationships , 1997, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[8]  M. Castro,et al.  Peak torque per unit cross-sectional area differs between strength-trained and untrained young adults. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  J. Fleg,et al.  Muscle quality. I. Age-associated differences between arm and leg muscle groups. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  F. Bonde-petersen,et al.  The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans , 1979, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[11]  D. Sale,et al.  Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[12]  R C Woledge,et al.  Interpreting the relation between force and cross-sectional area in human muscle. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  D G Sale,et al.  Voluntary strength and muscle characteristics in untrained men and women and male bodybuilders. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  D. Sale,et al.  A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women , 1997, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  K. Cureton,et al.  Sex difference in muscular strength in equally-trained men and women. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[16]  J. Timothy,et al.  Is weakness in old age due to muscle wasting? , 1980, Age and ageing.

[17]  T. Abe,et al.  The role of FFM accumulation and skeletal muscle architecture in powerlifting performance , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[18]  P. Schantz,et al.  Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans. , 1983, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. , 2001, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  N. A. Doldo,et al.  Effects of moderate-velocity strength training on peak muscle power and movement velocity: do women respond differently than men? , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  M. Stokes,et al.  Size and strength of the quadriceps muscles of old and young women * , 1984, European journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  K. Häkkinen,et al.  Muscle cross-sectional area, force production and relaxation characteristics in women at different ages , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[24]  Nigel K. Stepto,et al.  Adaptations to Training in Endurance Cyclists , 2001, Sports medicine.

[25]  B. Tracy,et al.  Age and sex affect human muscle fibre adaptations to heavy‐resistance strength training , 2006, Experimental physiology.

[26]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Morphological and functional differences in the elbow extensor muscle between highly trained male and female athletes , 1998, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[27]  James Stray-Gundersen,et al.  Muscle cross-sectional area and torque in resistance-trained subjects , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.