High-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary prostate cancer: the first UK series

Background:The use of minimally invasive ablative therapies in localised prostate cancer offer potential for a middle ground between active surveillance and radical therapy.Methods:An analysis of men with organ-confined prostate cancer treated with transrectal whole-gland HIFU (Sonablate 500) between 1 February 2005 and 15 May 2007 was carried out in two centres. Outcome data (side-effects using validated patient questionnaires, biochemical, histology) were evaluated.Results:A total of 172 men were treated under general anaesthetic as day-case procedures with 78% discharged a mean 5 h after treatment. Mean follow-up was 346 days (range 135–759 days). Urethral stricture was significantly lower in those with suprapubic catheter compared with urethral catheters (19.4 vs 40.4%, P=0.005). Antibiotics were given to 23.8% of patients for presumed urinary tract infection and the rate of epididymitis was 7.6%. Potency was maintained in 70% by 12 months, whereas mild stress urinary incontinence (no pads) was reported in 7.0% (12 out of 172) with a further 0.6% (1 out of 172) requiring pads. There was no rectal toxicity and no recto-urethral fistulae. In all, 78.3% achieved a PSA nadir ⩽0.5 μg ml−1 at 12 months, with 57.8% achieving ⩽0.2 μg ml−1. Then, 8 out of 13 were retreated with HIFU, one had salvage external beam radiotherapy and four chose active surveillance for small-volume low-risk disease. Overall, there was no evidence of disease (PSA <0.5 μg ml−1 or negative biopsy if nadir not achieved) after one HIFU session in 92.4% (159 out of 172) of patients.Conclusion:HIFU is a minimally invasive, day-case ablative technique that can achieve good biochemical outcomes in the short term with minimal urinary incontinence and acceptable levels of erectile dysfunction. Long-term outcome needs further evaluation and the inception of an international registry for cases treated using HIFU will significantly aid this health technology assessment.

[1]  F. Macbeth,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: summary of NICE guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Re: Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[3]  C. Ogden,et al.  Visually directed high‐intensity focused ultrasound for organ‐confined prostate cancer: a proposed standard for the conduct of therapy , 2006, BJU international.

[4]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Prediction of indolent prostate cancer: validation and updating of a prognostic nomogram. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  B. Donnelly,et al.  Whole gland primary prostate cryoablation: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[7]  P. Chandnani,et al.  Parasitic blood supply from the inferior mesenteric arteries to the hypernephromas. , 1977, The Journal of urology.

[8]  C. Chaussy,et al.  The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection , 2003, Current urology reports.

[9]  G. Martignoni,et al.  Short‐term outcome after high‐intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of patients with high‐risk prostate cancer , 2006, BJU international.

[10]  Anthony V D'Amico,et al.  Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Laura Curiel,et al.  Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 patients. , 2007, European urology.

[12]  S B Malkowicz,et al.  Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy , External Beam Radiation Therapy , or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2000 .

[13]  Bernhard Walter,et al.  First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localised prostate cancer. , 2008, European urology.

[14]  J. Chapelon,et al.  Transrectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: Factors Influencing the Outcome , 2001, European Urology.

[15]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[16]  James D. Cox,et al.  Consensus statement: Guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy , 1997 .

[17]  Mitsuru Sasako,et al.  Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  R. Grilli,et al.  Managing the introduction of expensive medical procedures: use of a registry , 2006, Journal of health services research & policy.

[19]  A. Partin,et al.  Is it possible to compare PSA recurrence-free survival after surgery and radiotherapy using revised ASTRO criterion--"nadir + 2"? , 2008, Urology.

[20]  C. Parker,et al.  Active Surveillance With Selective Radical Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer , 2007, Cancer journal.

[21]  Hashim Uddin Ahmed,et al.  Will focal therapy become a standard of care for men with localized prostate cancer? , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[22]  J. Leach,et al.  Guideline Development Group , 2008 .

[23]  D. Hussey American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology , 2001 .

[24]  Guy Vallancien,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. , 2003, Journal of endourology.

[25]  T. Wilt,et al.  Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness and Harms of Treatments for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Reply to S Eggener, M Gonzalgo and O Yossepowitch: ‘High-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary prostate cancer: the first UK series’ , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  Toyoaki Uchida,et al.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer using high‐intensity focused ultrasound , 2006, BJU international.

[28]  Guy Vallancien,et al.  Transrectal focused ultrasound combined with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: feasibility study. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[29]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  S. Ramsey,et al.  Why do men choose one treatment over another? , 2006, Cancer.

[31]  M. Schostak,et al.  PSA nadir is a significant predictor of treatment failure after high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of localised prostate cancer. , 2008, European urology.

[32]  Anthony V D'Amico,et al.  Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[33]  Toyoaki Uchida,et al.  Five years experience of transrectal high‐intensity focused ultrasound using the Sonablate device in the treatment of localized prostate cancer , 2006, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[34]  Bernhard Walter,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. , 2004, Urology.

[35]  Paul Schellhammer,et al.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  P. Scardino,et al.  Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[37]  B. Donnelly,et al.  1141: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing External Beam Radiation and Cryoablation in Localized Prostate Cancer , 2007 .

[38]  Oliver Sartor,et al.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[39]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.