Optimal Electromechanical Reshaping of the Auricular Ear and Long-term Outcomes in an In Vivo Rabbit Model.

IMPORTANCE The prominent ear is a common external ear anomaly that is usually corrected through surgery. Electromechanical reshaping (EMR) may provide the means to reshape cartilage through the use of direct current (in milliamperes) applied percutaneously with needle electrodes and thus to reduce reliance on open surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine the long-term outcomes (shape change, cell viability, and histology) of a more refined EMR voltage and time settings for reshaping rabbit auricle. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS The intact ears of 14 New Zealand white rabbits were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 received 4 V for 5 minutes (5 ears), 5 V for 4 minutes (5 ears), or no voltage for 5 minutes (control; 4 ears). Group 2 received an adjusted treatment of 4 V for 4 minutes (7 ears) or 5 V for 3 minutes (7 ears). A custom mold with platinum electrodes was used to bend the pinna and to perform EMR. Pinnae were splinted for 6 months along the region of the bend. Rabbits were killed humanely and the ears were harvested the day after splint removal. Data were collected from March 14, 2013, to July 8, 2014, and analyzed from August 29, 2013, to March 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Bend angle and mechanical behavior via palpation were recorded through photography and videography. Tissue was sectioned for histologic examination and confocal microscopy to assess changes to microscopic structure and cell viability. RESULTS Rabbits ranged in age from 6 to 8 months and weighed 3.8 to 4.0 g. The mean (SD) bend angles were 81° (45°) for the controls and, in the 5 EMR groups, 72° (29°) for 4 V for 4 minutes, 101° (19°) for 4 V for 5 minutes, 78° (18°) for 5 V for 3 minutes, and 126° (21°) for 5 V for 4 minutes. At 5 V, an increase in application time from 3 to 4 minutes provided significant shape change (78° [18°] and 126° [21°], respectively; P = .003). Pinnae stained with hematoxylin-eosin displayed localized areas of cell injury and fibrosis in and around electrode insertion sites. This circumferential zone of injury (range, 1.3-2.1 mm) corresponded to absence of red florescence on the cell viability assay. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this in vivo study, EMR produces shape changes in the intact pinnae of rabbits. A short application of 4 V or 5 V can achieve adequate reshaping of the pinnae. Tissue injury around the electrodes is modest in spatial distribution. This study provides a more optimal set of EMR variables and a critical step toward evaluation of EMR in clinical trials. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA.

[1]  S. Mordon,et al.  1064‐nm Nd: YAG laser‐assisted cartilage reshaping for treating ear protrusions , 2015, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  P. Vogt,et al.  Laser‐assisted cartilage reshaping for protruding ears: A review of the clinical applications , 2015, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  A. Tasman,et al.  Effect of protruding ears on visual fixation time and perception of personality. , 2015, JAMA facial plastic surgery.

[4]  S. Mehta,et al.  Incisionless otoplasty: a reliable and replicable technique for the correction of prominauris. , 2014, JAMA facial plastic surgery.

[5]  Cyrus T. Manuel,et al.  In vivo needle-based electromechanical reshaping of pinnae: New Zealand White rabbit model. , 2014, JAMA facial plastic surgery.

[6]  B. Wong,et al.  The Effect of pH on Rabbit Septal Cartilage Shape Change: Exploring the Mechanism of Electromechanical Tissue Reshaping , 2014, Eplasty.

[7]  Cyrus T. Manuel,et al.  In‐depth analysis of pH‐dependent mechanisms of electromechanical reshaping of rabbit nasal septal cartilage , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  J. Quilichini,et al.  Cartilage splitting without stitches: technique and outcomes. , 2013, JAMA facial plastic surgery.

[9]  Cyrus T. Manuel,et al.  Ex Vivo Electromechanical Reshaping of Costal Cartilage in the New Zealand White Rabbit Model , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  Serge R Mordon,et al.  Cartilage reshaping for protruding ears: A prospective long term follow‐up of 32 procedures , 2011, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[11]  B. Wong,et al.  Changes in the tangent modulus of rabbit septal and auricular cartilage following electromechanical reshaping. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Cyrus T. Manuel,et al.  Electromechanical reshaping of costal cartilage grafts: A new surgical treatment modality , 2011, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  Cyrus T. Manuel,et al.  Porcine cartilage model for simulation of nasal tip aesthetics and mechanics. , 2011, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[14]  Brian J. F. Wong,et al.  Needle-Electrode-Based Electromechanical Reshaping of Rabbit Septal Cartilage: A Systematic Evaluation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Brian J. F. Wong,et al.  Survival of Chondrocytes in Rabbit Septal Cartilage After Electromechanical Reshaping , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Brian J. F. Wong,et al.  Needle Electrode-Based Electromechanical Reshaping of Cartilage , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Serge Mordon,et al.  Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping (LACR) for Treating Ear Protrusions: A Clinical Study in 24 Patients , 2010, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[18]  B. Wong Correction of ear malformations by laser‐assisted cartilage reshaping (LACR) , 2006 .

[19]  S. Mobley,et al.  Nuances of otoplasty: a comprehensive review of the past 20 years. , 2006, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.

[20]  Hermann Raunig Antihelix plasty without modeling sutures. , 2005, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[21]  L. Hollier,et al.  Otoplasty: Evaluation, Technique, and Review , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[22]  D. Martin,et al.  Otoplasty by percutaneous anterior scoring. Another twist to the story: a long-term study of 114 patients. , 2003, British journal of plastic surgery.

[23]  S. Kabaker,et al.  The "electric" otoplasty. , 1999, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[24]  M. Fritsch Incisionless otoplasty , 1995, Facial plastic surgery : FPS.

[25]  E. Ely A classic reprint: An operation for prominence of the auricles (with two wood-cuts) , 1987, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[26]  D. Furnas CORRECTION OF PROMINENT EARS BY CONCHA‐MASTOID SUTURES , 1968, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  J. Mustardé The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. , 1963, British journal of plastic surgery.

[28]  Cyrus T. Manuel,et al.  In vivo electromechanical reshaping of ear cartilage in a rabbit model: a minimally invasive approach for otoplasty. , 2013, JAMA facial plastic surgery.