Tissue Phenomics for prognostic biomarker discovery in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

Tissue Phenomics is the discipline of mining tissue images to identify patterns that are related to clinical outcome providing potential prognostic and predictive value. This involves the discovery process from assay development, image analysis, and data mining to the final interpretation and validation of the findings. Importantly, this process is not linear but allows backward steps and optimization loops over multiple sub-processes. We provide a detailed description of the Tissue Phenomics methodology while exemplifying each step on the application of prostate cancer recurrence prediction. In particular, we automatically identified tissue-based biomarkers having significant prognostic value for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients (Gleason scores 6–7b) after radical prostatectomy. We found that promising phenes were related to CD8(+) and CD68(+) cells in the microenvironment of cancerous glands in combination with the local micro-vascularization. Recurrence prediction based on the selected phenes yielded accuracies up to 83% thereby clearly outperforming prediction based on the Gleason score. Moreover, we compared different machine learning algorithms to combine the most relevant phenes resulting in increased accuracies of 88% for tumor progression prediction. These findings will be of potential use for future prognostic tests for prostate cancer patients and provide a proof-of-principle of the Tissue Phenomics approach.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  Milind M. Mushrif,et al.  HISTOPATHOLOGICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS USING IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES : AN OVERVIEW , 2012 .

[3]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Color Transfer between Images , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  E. Giannoni,et al.  The Role of M1 and M2 Macrophages in Prostate Cancer in relation to Extracapsular Tumor Extension and Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy , 2014, BioMed research international.

[5]  Mehmet Yigitsoy,et al.  Hierarchical patch-based co-registration of differently stained histopathology slides , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[6]  P. Lipponen,et al.  Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes: A prognostic factor of PSA-free survival in patients with local prostate carcinoma treated by radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[7]  T. Rebbeck,et al.  Co-Occurring Gland Angularity in Localized Subgraphs: Predicting Biochemical Recurrence in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  K. Pienta,et al.  TAM macrophages promote growth and metastasis within the cancer ecosystem , 2014, Oncoimmunology.

[9]  Jan Modersitzki,et al.  Multimodal Image Registration in Digital Pathology Using Cell Nuclei Densities , 2015, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[10]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[11]  S. Omholt,et al.  Phenomics: the next challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  O Bodenreider,et al.  Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. , 2008, Yearbook of medical informatics.

[13]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Unsupervised Color Decomposition Of Histologically Stained Tissue Samples , 2003, NIPS.

[14]  N. Schork,et al.  Genetics of complex disease: approaches, problems, and solutions. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Multidimensional clustering algorithms , 1985 .

[16]  Michal Valko,et al.  Feature Selection and Dimensionality Reduction in Genomics and Proteomics , 2007 .

[17]  G. Swanson,et al.  Prognostic Factors for Failure after Prostatectomy , 2010, Journal of Cancer.

[18]  Jennifer R. Rider,et al.  CD4 helper T cells, CD8 cytotoxic T cells, and FOXP3+ regulatory T cells with respect to lethal prostate cancer , 2013, Modern Pathology.

[19]  Justine Allard,et al.  Image processing in digital pathology: an opportunity to solve inter-batch variability of immunohistochemical staining , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[20]  The relationship between T-lymphocyte subset infiltration and survival in patients with prostate cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  R. Madan,et al.  Developing immunotherapy strategies in the treatment of prostate cancer , 2016, Asian journal of urology.

[22]  P. Lipponen,et al.  Histological grade, perineural infiltration, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and apoptosis as determinants of long-term prognosis in prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1994, European journal of cancer.

[23]  Andrew H. Beck,et al.  Systematic Analysis of Breast Cancer Morphology Uncovers Stromal Features Associated with Survival , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[24]  P. Caie,et al.  Quantification of tumour budding, lymphatic vessel density and invasion through image analysis in colorectal cancer , 2014, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[25]  S. Sebens,et al.  M1 and M2: there is no “good” and “bad”—How macrophages promote malignancy-associated features in tumorigenesis , 2014, Oncoimmunology.

[26]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Decision Forests with Long-Range Spatial Context for Organ Localization in CT Volumes , 2009 .

[27]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[28]  Nicolas Brieu,et al.  Automated Whole Slide Analysis of Differently Stained and Co-Registered Tissue Sections , 2015, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[29]  V. Smith,et al.  An Analytical Approach Differentiates Between Individual and Collective Cancer Invasion , 2011, Analytical cellular pathology.

[30]  Guy Perrière,et al.  MADE4: an R package for multivariate analysis of gene expression data , 2005, Bioinform..

[31]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[32]  Y. Miyata,et al.  Response to Re: Reconsideration of the clinical and histopathological significance of angiogenesis in prostate cancer: Usefulness and limitations of microvessel density measurement , 2015, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[33]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Phenomics: the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale , 2009, Neuroscience.

[34]  Michael Gadermayr,et al.  A Quantitative Assessment of Image Normalization for Classifying Histopathological Tissue of the Kidney , 2017, GCPR.

[35]  Thomas Kirchner,et al.  Migrating cancer stem cells — an integrated concept of malignant tumour progression , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[36]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A Quantitative Histomorphometric Classifier (QuHbIC) Identifies Aggressive Versus Indolent p16-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[37]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  Multi-class stain separation using independent component analysis , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[38]  Peter D Caie,et al.  Human tissue in systems medicine , 2013, The FEBS journal.

[39]  R Y Ball,et al.  Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs , 2005 .

[40]  G. MacBeath,et al.  Single-cell quantitative HER2 measurement identifies heterogeneity and distinct subgroups within traditionally defined HER2-positive patients. , 2013, The American journal of pathology.

[41]  T. Eberlein,et al.  Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation , 2012 .

[42]  F. Prall Tumour budding in colorectal carcinoma , 2007, Histopathology.

[43]  Y. Miyata,et al.  Reconsideration of the clinical and histopathological significance of angiogenesis in prostate cancer: Usefulness and limitations of microvessel density measurement , 2015, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[44]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[45]  Johannes Zimmermann,et al.  Automated analysis and detailed quantification of biomedical images using Definiens Cognition Network Technology. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[46]  Genetics meets pathology – an increasingly important relationship , 2017, The Journal of pathology.

[47]  Joakim Lindblad,et al.  Blind Color Decomposition of Histological Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[48]  J. S. Marron,et al.  A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[49]  Mitko Veta,et al.  Prognostic value of automatically extracted nuclear morphometric features in whole slide images of male breast cancer , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[50]  H. Ozkardeş,et al.  Predictive values of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel‐density levels in initial biopsy for prostate cancer , 2016, The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences.

[51]  Nathalie Harder,et al.  Co-occurrence features characterizing gland distribution patterns as new prognostic markers in prostate cancer whole-slide images , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[52]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[53]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[54]  F. Marincola,et al.  Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force , 2012, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[55]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[56]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Structure-Preserving Color Normalization and Sparse Stain Separation for Histological Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[57]  C. Sautès-Fridman,et al.  The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[58]  Sotirios A. Tsaftaris,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention , 2017 .

[59]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis , 1999 .

[60]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[61]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Quantitative Image Analysis of Cellular Heterogeneity in Breast Tumors Complements Genomic Profiling , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[62]  Jun Xu,et al.  Sparse Non-negative Matrix Factorization (SNMF) based color unmixing for breast histopathological image analysis , 2015, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[63]  Darren Treanor,et al.  Histopathology in 3D: From three-dimensional reconstruction to multi-stain and multi-modal analysis , 2015, Journal of pathology informatics.

[64]  Carlos M. Alaíz,et al.  Cell-Based Fuzzy Metrics Enhance High-Content Screening (HCS) Assay Robustness , 2013, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[65]  M. Hussein,et al.  Phenotypic characterization of the infiltrating immune cells in normal prostate, benign nodular prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2009, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[66]  Nicolas Brieu,et al.  Learning size adaptive local maxima selection for robust nuclei detection in histopathology images , 2017, 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017).

[67]  L. Tholcopiyan,et al.  Cancer Progression Related with Tumor-associated Macrophages , 2016 .

[68]  Joshua C. Black,et al.  Cutpoint Methods in Digital Pathology and Companion Diagnostics , 2014 .

[69]  yang-xin fu,et al.  Tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes: friends or foes? , 2006, Laboratory Investigation.

[70]  George Lee,et al.  Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[71]  Fan Lin,et al.  Standardization of diagnostic immunohistochemistry: literature review and geisinger experience. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[72]  Nicolas Brieu,et al.  Slide-specific models for segmentation of differently stained digital histopathology whole slide images , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.