Sparse channel separation using random probes

This paper considers the problem of estimating the channel response (or the Green's function) between multiple source–receiver pairs. Typically, the channel responses are estimated one-at-a-time: a single source sends out a known probe signal, the receiver measures the probe signal convolved with the channel response and the responses are recovered using deconvolution. In this paper, we show that if the channel responses are sparse and the probe signals are random, then we can significantly reduce the total amount of time required to probe the channels by activating all of the sources simultaneously. With all sources activated simultaneously, the receiver measures a superposition of all the channel responses convolved with the respective probe signals. Separating this cumulative response into individual channel responses can be posed as a linear inverse problem. We show that channel response separation is possible (and stable) even when the probing signals are relatively short in spite of the corresponding linear system of equations becoming severely underdetermined. We derive a theoretical lower bound on the length of the source signals that guarantees that this separation is possible with high probability. The bound is derived by putting the problem in the context of finding a sparse solution to an underdetermined system of equations, and then using mathematical tools from the theory of compressive sensing. Finally, we discuss some practical applications of these results, which include forward modeling for seismic imaging, channel equalization in multiple-input multiple-output communication and increasing the field-of-view in an imaging system by using coded apertures.

[1]  J. Claerbout,et al.  Robust Modeling With Erratic Data , 1973 .

[2]  F. Santosa,et al.  Linear inversion of ban limit reflection seismograms , 1986 .

[3]  E E Fenimore,et al.  New family of binary arrays for coded aperture imaging. , 1989, Applied optics.

[4]  J. A. Catipovic,et al.  Performance limitations in underwater acoustic telemetry , 1990 .

[5]  J. Scales,et al.  Regularisation of nonlinear inverse problems: imaging the near-surface weathering layer , 1990 .

[6]  M. Talagrand,et al.  Probability in Banach spaces , 1991 .

[7]  E. Giné,et al.  Decoupling: From Dependence to Independence , 1998 .

[8]  Jean-Jacques Fuchs,et al.  Multipath time-delay detection and estimation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse channel estimation via matching pursuit with application to equalization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Sparse representations in unions of bases , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  M. Talagrand The Generic Chaining , 2005 .

[13]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[14]  M. Talagrand The Generic chaining : upper and lower bounds of stochastic processes , 2005 .

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Quantitative Robust Uncertainty Principles and Optimally Sparse Decompositions , 2004, Found. Comput. Math..

[16]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Random Filters for Compressive Sampling and Reconstruction , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[18]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[19]  Terence Tao,et al.  The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when P is much larger than n , 2005, math/0506081.

[20]  M. Rudelson,et al.  On sparse reconstruction from Fourier and Gaussian measurements , 2008 .

[21]  Yin Zhang,et al.  Fixed-Point Continuation for l1-Minimization: Methodology and Convergence , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[22]  Wotao Yin,et al.  Bregman Iterative Algorithms for (cid:2) 1 -Minimization with Applications to Compressed Sensing ∗ , 2008 .

[23]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Iterative Hard Thresholding for Compressed Sensing , 2008, ArXiv.

[24]  Rebecca Willett,et al.  Fast disambiguation of superimposed images for increased field of view , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[25]  R. DeVore,et al.  A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices , 2008 .

[26]  David J Brady,et al.  Superimposed video disambiguation for increased field of view. , 2008, Optics express.

[27]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[28]  J. Tropp On the conditioning of random subdictionaries , 2008 .

[29]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames , 2008 .

[30]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Compressive Sensing by Random Convolution , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[31]  J. Tropp,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[32]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  High-Resolution Radar via Compressed Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[33]  Rebecca Willett,et al.  Compressive coded aperture imaging , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[34]  Holger Rauhut,et al.  Circulant and Toeplitz matrices in compressed sensing , 2009, ArXiv.

[35]  Justin Romberg,et al.  Multiple channel estimation using spectrally random probes , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[36]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Compressive simultaneous full-waveform simulation , 2009 .

[37]  Max Deffenbaugh,et al.  Efficient seismic forward modeling using simultaneous random sources and sparsity , 2010 .

[38]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Beyond Nyquist: Efficient Sampling of Sparse Bandlimited Signals , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[39]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Toeplitz Compressed Sensing Matrices With Applications to Sparse Channel Estimation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[40]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  NESTA: A Fast and Accurate First-Order Method for Sparse Recovery , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..