Using probe-microphone measurements to improve the match to target gain and frequency response slope, as a function of earmould style, frequency, and input level

Abstract Objective: Matching a prescription gain target at 60–65 dB SPL does not ensure audibility of lower input levels, nor does it mean the fitted frequency response slope is conducive to good sound quality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of probe-microphone measurements to match target gain and slope, as a function of earmould style, frequency, and input level. Design: The real-ear insertion gain was calculated for an input of 50, 65, and 80 dB SPL for the manufacturer’s ‘initial fit’ (IF) settings and after adjustment to target in 49 and 51 open slim-tube and custom earmould fittings, respectively. Study sample: One hundred adults with median age 74 years (range 32–93). Results: Some 18%–67% of the IF settings were within 10 dB of the target gain but this increased to >85% after adjustment. Some 47%–71% of the IF settings were within 10 dB of the target slope but, with the exception of 2–4 kHz, this increased to >88% after adjustment. Conclusions: The results indicate that IF settings are inadequate, at least for the model of hearing aid used in the present study; however, significant discrepancies remained, even after adjustment.

[1]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Harvey Dillon What ’ s New in Prescriptive Fittings Down Under ? Gitte Keidser , .

[3]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids. , 2012, American journal of audiology.

[4]  H Gustav Mueller,et al.  Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  A. Baumfield,et al.  Factors affecting the use and perceived benefit of ITE and BTE hearing aids , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[6]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The value of routine real ear measurement of the gain of digital hearing aids. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments , 2012, Trends in amplification.

[9]  S Gatehouse,et al.  The value of routine in-the-ear measurement of hearing aid gain. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[10]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .

[11]  K J Munro,et al.  Customized Acoustic Transform Functions and Their Accuracy at Predicting Real‐Ear Hearing Aid Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[12]  B. Moore,et al.  Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  Real-Life Efficacy and Reliability of Training a Hearing Aid , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[14]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[15]  D Byrne,et al.  Evaluation of the National Acoustic Laboratories' new hearing aid selection procedure. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  W Noble,et al.  Effects of Earmold Type on Ability to Locate Sounds When Wearing Hearing Aids , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[17]  David B. Hawkins,et al.  Hearing aid software predictive gain values: How accurate are they? , 2003 .

[18]  G Keidser,et al.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[19]  R. G. Harrowven Insertion gain versus median ear corrected coupler gain: a comparison of two fitting methods in new NHS hearing aid users. , 1998, British journal of audiology.

[20]  J. Kates Principles of Digital Dynamic-Range Compression , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[21]  Nancy L. Aarts,et al.  Manufacturer Predicted And Measured REAR Values In Adult Hearing Aid Fitting: Accuracy And Clinical Usefulness , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[22]  M E Hostler A 'Goodness of Fit calculator' , 2004 .