Attention is needed for action control: Further evidence from grasping

In this study we investigated whether motor and perceptual tasks share common attentional resources. To this end, we used a dual-task paradigm requiring participants to perform grasping movements toward objects of varying size and at the same time to identify a perceptual target presented at the object's location. To ensure that both tasks were performed simultaneously and to prevent participants from adopting a sequential strategy, the perceptual target was always presented after movement onset and could occur at two different moments in time (early vs. late). Our findings show that both, the planning and the control of the movement were altered in the dual-task condition, resulting in prolonged reaction times and delayed adjustment of the grip to object size. Also, the perceptual performance was impaired when both tasks were performed concurrently. These findings are in contrast with previous studies suggesting that only movement planning but not movement control are susceptible to dual-task interferences (Enns & Liu, 2009, chap. 12). Instead, our results give further evidence for the proposition that the dorsal (visuomotor) and ventral (perceptual) stream share the same attentional resources and that attention is required for effective grasping.

[1]  D. Knill,et al.  Humans use visual and remembered information about object location to plan pointing movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional selection in sequential manual movements, movements around an obstacle and in grasping , 2005 .

[3]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[4]  U. Castiello Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  James T Enns,et al.  Attentional limits and freedom in visually guided action. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[6]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  U. Castiello Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Volker H Franz,et al.  Corrective Processes in Grasping After Perturbations of Object Size , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  W. Schneider VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action , 1995 .

[10]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[11]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .

[12]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Divided attention to grasp-relevant locations , 2011 .

[13]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  J. Enns,et al.  Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  U. Castiello,et al.  Attentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes Differential interference effects , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Efficient grasping requires attentional resources , 2011, Vision Research.

[17]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Processing Under Dual-Task Conditions , 2007, Psychological science.

[18]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Fixation locations when grasping partly occluded objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  J. Norman Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[20]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[21]  H. Deubel,et al.  Selective Dorsal and Ventral Processing: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism in Reaching and Perception , 1998 .

[22]  J. Tresilian Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Differences in fixations between grasping and viewing objects. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[24]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements , 2006, Vision Research.

[25]  H. Deubel,et al.  Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping , 2010, Vision Research.

[26]  S. Tipper,et al.  Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  James R Tresilian,et al.  Selective attention in reaching: when is an object not a distractor? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[29]  M. Goodale,et al.  Plans for action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.