Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to compare the image quality of tomosynthesis with that of conventional mammography and to estimate the recall rate of screening when tomosynthesis is used in addition to mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women with an abnormal screening mammography were recruited sequentially. Consenting women underwent tomosynthesis of the affected breast corresponding to the views obtained with diagnostic mammography. The study radiologist compared the image quality, including lesion conspicuity and feature analysis, of tomosynthesis with diagnostic film-screen mammography and assessed the need for recall when tomosynthesis was added to digital screening mammography. Screening recalls were considered unnecessary when tomosynthesis did not show a corresponding abnormality or allowed definitely benign lesion characterization. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the association of equivalence and recall status with mammographic finding type. RESULTS There were 99 digital screening recalls in 98 women. The image quality of tomosynthesis was equivalent (n = 51) or superior (n = 37) to diagnostic mammography in 89% (88/99). Finding type was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with equivalence. Approximately half--52/99 (52%)--of the findings would not have been recalled when digital screening mammography was supplemented with tomosynthesis. When adjusting for confounding conditions, the recall reduction was 40% (37/92). The likelihood of recall was also dependent on finding type (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Subjectively, tomosynthesis has comparable or superior image quality to that of film-screen mammography in the diagnostic setting, and it has the potential to decrease the recall rate when used adjunctively with digital screening mammography.

[1]  Hikaru Seto,et al.  Detection of incidental breast tumors by noncontrast spiral computed tomography of the chest , 2008, Radiation Medicine.

[2]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. , 2008, Medical physics.

[3]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[4]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  P. Stang,et al.  Resource Use and Cost of Diagnostic Workup of Women with Suspected Breast Cancer , 2009, The breast journal.

[8]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Christobel Saunders,et al.  New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection. , 2008, Future oncology.

[10]  Andrew Karellas,et al.  Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer. , 2008, Medical physics.

[11]  A. Karellas,et al.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. , 2008, Medical physics.

[12]  Andrew Smith,et al.  Full-field breast tomosynthesis. , 2005, Radiology management.

[13]  David Gur,et al.  Tomosynthesis: potential clinical role in breast imaging. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  R A Schmidt,et al.  Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[15]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.