Robust inference concerning recent trends in US environmental quality

Understanding trends in environmental quality is important for individuals and policymakers. Typically, trends in environmental quality are determined solely through comparisons of unconditional or conditional mean pollution levels. However, reaching unambiguous conclusions on the basis of only the first moment of the (unconditional or conditional) distribution is problematic since it ignores what is occurring in different regions of the distribution. Even relying on indices that incorporate both mean and variance is suspect to the extent that relative rankings are not typically robust to index choice. Addressing these concerns, we adapt recent developments in the stochastic dominance literature to test for unambiguous relations between current and past distributions of toxic releases. Using EPA data from 1988–1999, we find statistically significant evidence that the unconditional 1999 distributions of air, land, underground and total toxic releases dominate in a first-degree sense their respective 1988 distributions. While some of this improvement is explained by economic growth, pollution net-of-income improved over the sample period as well. Finally, we document robust differences in the distribution of pollution across regions in the US. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  O. Linton,et al.  Consistent Testing for Stochastic Dominance Under General Sampling Schemes , 2003 .

[2]  John A. List,et al.  The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Real Progress or Misspecified Models? , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  Daniel L. Millimet,et al.  Environmental Compliance Costs and the Distribution of Emissions in the U.S. , 2002 .

[4]  Alberto Abadie.  Bootstrap Tests for Distributional Treatment Effects in Instrumental Variable Models , 2002 .

[5]  E. Maasoumi,et al.  Clusters of attributes and well‐being in the USA , 2001 .

[6]  J. Formby,et al.  The effect of food stamp cashout on undernutrition , 2000 .

[7]  E. Maasoumi,et al.  Stochastic dominance amongst swedish income distributions , 2000 .

[8]  John A. List,et al.  Have air pollutant emissions converged among U.S. regions? Evidence from unit root tests , 1999 .

[9]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  Do Community Characteristics Influence Environmental Outcomes?: Evidence from the Toxics Release Inventory , 1998 .

[10]  G. Fisher,et al.  An empirical analysis of term premiums using significance tests for stochastic dominance , 1998 .

[11]  A. Levinson,et al.  Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Automotive Lead Emissions , 1998 .

[12]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 19502050 , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  R. Davidson,et al.  Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and for the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality , 1998 .

[14]  J. Heckman,et al.  Making the Most out of Programme Evaluations and Social Experiments: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Programme Impacts , 1997 .

[15]  B. Yandle,et al.  EPA's toxic release inventory: stimulus and response , 1997 .

[16]  Matthew E. Kahn.  The Silver Lining Of Rust Belt Manufacturing Decline: Killing Off Pollution Externalities , 1997 .

[17]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  DEMAND FOR ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS : EVIDENCE FROM VOTING PATTERNS ON CALIFORNIA INITIATIVES * , 2008 .

[18]  Rajiv Sethi,et al.  The Distribution of Pollution: Community Characteristics and Exposure to Air Toxics , 1997 .

[19]  Matthew E. Kahn.  Particulate pollution trends in the United States , 1997 .

[20]  Gordon Anderson,et al.  Nonparametric Tests of Stochastic Dominance in Income Distributions , 1996 .

[21]  J. Doull.  Specificity and dosimetry of toxicologic responses. , 1996, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[22]  J. Formby,et al.  Relative undernutrition in Puerto Rico under alternative food assistance programmes , 1996 .

[23]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program , 1995 .

[24]  Harshinder Singh,et al.  Testing for Second-Order Stochastic Dominance of Two Distributions , 1994, Econometric Theory.

[25]  J. Formby,et al.  International Comparisons of Welfare and Poverty: Dominance Orderings for Ten Countries , 1993 .

[26]  D. Holtz-eakin,et al.  Stoking the Fires? Co2 Emissions and Economic Growth , 1992 .

[27]  J. Formby,et al.  Nutrition and nonparticipation in the US food stamp programme , 1992 .

[28]  D A Savitz,et al.  Pulmonary function and ambient particulate matter: epidemiological evidence from NHANES I. , 1991, Archives of environmental health.

[29]  B. Pashigian,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION: WHOSE SELF‐INTERESTS ARE BEING PROTECTED? , 1985 .

[30]  Stephen G. Donald,et al.  Consistent Tests for Stochastic Dominance , 2003 .

[31]  J. Horowitz.  Response to comments of Esfandiar Maasoumi , 2001 .

[32]  E. Maasoumi.  On the relevance of first-order asymptotic theory to economics , 2001 .

[33]  D. McFadden.  Testing for Stochastic Dominance , 1989 .