Upper-left gaze bias reveals competing search strategies in a reverse Stroop task.

Three experiments with a total of 87 human observers revealed an upper-left spatial bias in the initial movement of gaze during visual search. The bias was present whether or not the explicit control of gaze was required for the task. This bias may be part of a search strategy that competed with the fixed-gaze parallel search strategy hypothesized by Durgin [Durgin, F. H. (2003). Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect. Perception &Psychophysics, 65, 367-378.] for this task. When the spatial probabilities of the search target were manipulated either in accord with or in opposition to the existing upper-left bias, two orthogonal factors of interference in the latency data were differentially affected. The two factors corresponded to two different forms of representation and search. Target probabilities consistent with the gaze bias encouraged opportunistic serial search (including gaze shifts), while symmetrically opposing target probabilities produced latency patterns more consistent with parallel search based on a sensory code.

[1]  F. Previc,et al.  Why your "head is in the clouds" during thinking: the relationship between cognition and upper space. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[2]  A. Lévy-schoen.  Détermination et latence de la réponse oculomotrice à deux stimulus simultanés ou successifs selon leur excentricité relative , 1969 .

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  The Stroop Test: Selective Attention to Colours and Words , 1969, Nature.

[4]  D. Robinson,et al.  Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements , 1996, Nature.

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[6]  R. Melara,et al.  Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Supporting The "Grand Illusion" Of Direct Perception: Implicit Learning In Eye-Movement Control , 1999 .

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[10]  Le champ d'activité du regard : données expérimentales , 1974 .

[11]  J. Findlay.  The Visual Stimulus for Saccadic Eye Movements in Human Observers , 1980, Perception.

[12]  Jan De Houwer,et al.  On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect , 2003 .

[13]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[14]  G. S. Klein,et al.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article EYE MOVEMENTS REVEAL THE SPATIOTEMPORAL DYNAMICS OE VISUAL SEARCH , 2022 .

[16]  A. Levy-Schoen.  [Visual field exploration: experimental data]. , 1974, L'annee psychologique.

[17]  J. E. McDonald,et al.  Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Findlay,et al.  Saccade target selection in visual search: the effect of information from the previous fixation , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  Lew B. Stelmach,et al.  Attentional and Ocular Movements , 1997 .

[21]  Donald Denoon,et al.  A grand illusion , 1973 .

[22]  Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Ariane Levy Schoen.  Détermination et latence de la réponse oculomotrice à deux stimulus simultanés ou successifs selon leur excentricité relative , 1969 .

[24]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[25]  R W Proctor,et al.  Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades , 2004, Vision Research.

[27]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Klein,et al.  Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  Target location probability effects in visual search are an effect of sequential dependencies , 2010 .

[30]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[31]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Modeling Saccadic Targeting in Visual Search , 1995, NIPS.

[32]  J. Findlay.  Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[33]  F H Durgin,et al.  The reverse Stroop effect , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Eye movements during visual search: the costs of choosing the optimal path , 2001, Vision Research.

[36]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The zone of focal attention during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[37]  V. J. Dark,et al.  Semantic and spatial components of selective attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  E. W. Yund,et al.  Spatial Nonuniformities in Visual Search , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Verbal interference in a perceptual comparison task , 1969 .

[40]  H. Egeth,et al.  Toward a translational model of Stroop interference , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[41]  J. Findlay,et al.  Eye guidance and visual search , 1998 .

[42]  D. E. Irwin.  Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing , 2004 .

[43]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements , 2004 .

[44]  Peter De Graef,et al.  Prefixational Object Perception in Scenes , 1998 .

[45]  Alwyn C. Scott,et al.  Toward a Science of Consciousness II , 1998 .

[46]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect , 2004, Psychological research.

[47]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[48]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[50]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[51]  F N Dyer,et al.  The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Probability Cuing of Target Location Facilitates Visual Search Implicitly in Normal Participants and Patients with Hemispatial Neglect , 2002, Psychological science.