Komponentenerkennung durch Begriffsanalyse

[1]  Jean-Francois Girard,et al.  A comparison of abstract data types and objects recovery techniques , 2000, Sci. Comput. Program..

[2]  D. R. Harris,et al.  Recovering abstract data types and object instances from a conventional procedural language , 1995, Proceedings of 2nd Working Conference on Reverse Engineering.

[3]  Rainer Koschke,et al.  Analyzing xfig using the Bauhaus tool , 2000, Proceedings Seventh Working Conference on Reverse Engineering.

[4]  Houari A. Sahraoui,et al.  Applying concept formation methods to object identification in procedural code , 1997, Proceedings 12th IEEE International Conference Automated Software Engineering.

[5]  Gregor Snelting,et al.  Reengineering of configurations based on mathematical concept analysis , 1996, TSEM.

[6]  BryantA.,et al.  B. W. Boehm software engineering economics , 1983 .

[7]  Gregor Snelting,et al.  Assessing Modular Structure of Legacy Code Based on Mathematical Concept Analysis , 1997, Proceedings of the (19th) International Conference on Software Engineering.

[8]  Gerardo Canfora,et al.  An improved algorithm for identifying objects in code , 1996 .

[9]  Rainer Koschke,et al.  A framework for experimental evaluation of clustering techniques , 2000, Proceedings IWPC 2000. 8th International Workshop on Program Comprehension.

[10]  Thomas W. Reps,et al.  Identifying Modules via Concept Analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[11]  Rainer Koschke,et al.  Atomic architectural component recovery for program understanding and evolution , 2002, International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002. Proceedings..

[12]  N. Wilde,et al.  Identifying objects in a conventional procedural language: an example of data design recovery , 1990, Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1990.