Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Small World Connectivity on Firm Innovation

The structure of alliance networks strongly influences their potential for knowledge creation. Dense local clustering provides transmission capacity in the network by fostering communication and cooperation while non-redundant connections contract the distance between firms and give the network greater reach by tapping a wider range of knowledge resources. However, since firms are constrained in forming alliances, there appears to be a trade-off between creating transmission capacity versus reach. We argue that small world connectivity (i.e., simultaneity of high clustering and short average path lengths in a sparse, decentralized network) helps resolve this tradeoff by enabling transmission capacity and reach to be achieved simultaneously. We propose that firms embedded in alliance networks that exhibit high clustering and short average path lengths to a wide range of firms will experience greater knowledge creation than firms in networks that do not exhibit these characteristics. We find support for this proposition in a longitudinal study of the patent performance of 1106 firms in 11 industry-level alliance networks.

[1]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[2]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[3]  A. Wilhite,et al.  Bilateral Trade and ‘Small-World’ Networks , 2001 .

[4]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[5]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[7]  D. Farrington,et al.  ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND YOUTH GANG MEMBERSHIP: SELECTION AND SOCIALIZATION , 2004 .

[8]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[10]  P. Soh The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance , 2003 .

[11]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[12]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[13]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[14]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  Networks and Knowledge Production: Collaboration and Patenting in Biotechnology , 1999 .

[15]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[16]  Robin Cowan,et al.  The dynamics of collective invention , 2003 .

[17]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[18]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[19]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[20]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[21]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[22]  P. Allison,et al.  7. Fixed-Effects Negative Binomial Regression Models , 2002 .

[23]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[24]  D. Watts The “New” Science of Networks , 2004 .

[25]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[26]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[27]  P. Pattison,et al.  Small and Other Worlds: Global Network Structures from Local Processes1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy , 1999 .

[29]  A. Cameron,et al.  Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model☆ , 1990 .

[30]  Andrew B. Hargadon Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation , 2002 .

[31]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[34]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[35]  David C Grabowski,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[36]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[37]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[38]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[40]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[41]  W. Luker,et al.  Employment Shifts in High-Technology Industries, 1988-96 , 1997 .

[42]  Stephen P. Borgatti Identifying sets of key players in a network , 2003, IEMC '03 Proceedings. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37502).

[43]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[44]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[45]  Andrew B. Hargadon Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[46]  Jakob B. Madsen Book review: Basic Econometrics, Damodar N. Gujarati, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995 , 1998 .

[47]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[48]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[49]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms , 1996 .

[50]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[51]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[52]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[53]  B. Kogut Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[54]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks , 2001 .

[55]  S. C. Gilfillan,et al.  The sociology of invention , 1935 .

[56]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[57]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[58]  J. Hagedoorn Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[59]  Rachelle C. Sampson Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances , 2005 .

[60]  A. Cameron,et al.  Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests , 1986 .

[61]  D. Teece Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[62]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[63]  B. Kogut The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[64]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[65]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[66]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[67]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History , 1990 .

[68]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[69]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[70]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[71]  Thomas Cummings Innovation through alliances: Archimedes' hall of mirrors , 1991 .

[72]  Nicholas S. Vonortas Research joint ventures in the US , 1997 .

[73]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .

[74]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[75]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[76]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[77]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[78]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[79]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[80]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A History of Mechanical Inventions , 1961, Nature.

[81]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[82]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[83]  John Guare,et al.  Six Degrees of Separation: A Play , 1990 .

[84]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[85]  Maximino Aldana-Gonzalez,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2003 .

[86]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[87]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[88]  B. Wellman Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. , 1988 .

[89]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[90]  Judith K. Larsen,et al.  Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture.@@@Silicon Valley Fever: Growth of High-Technology Culture. , 1987 .

[91]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[92]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[93]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[94]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[95]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[96]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  The flow of information through social networks: diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency , 1994 .

[97]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[98]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[99]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[100]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[101]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[102]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[103]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Do alliances promote knowledge flows , 2006 .

[104]  Rachelle C. Sampson,et al.  The Cost of Misaligned Governance in R&D Alliances , 2003 .

[105]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[106]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[107]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[108]  D. Hecker High-Technology Employment: A Broader View , 1999 .

[109]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[110]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Connectivity of random nets , 1951 .

[111]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Random graph models of social networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[112]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[113]  G. Richardson,et al.  The Organisation of Industry , 1972 .

[114]  Toby E. Stuart Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[115]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[116]  M. Feldman The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .