Methods Development and use of Macroinvertebrates as Indicators of Ecological Conditions for Streams in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands Region

The Mid-Atlantic Highlands Assessment (MAHA) included the sampling of macroinvertebrates from 424 wadeable stream sites to determine status and trends, biological conditions, and water quality in first through third order streams in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands Region (MAHR) of the United States in 1993–1995. We identified reference and impaired sites using water chemistry and habitat criteria and evaluated a set of candidate macroinvertebrate metrics using a stepwise process. This process examined several metric characteristics, including ability of metrics to discriminate reference and impaired sites, relative scope of impairment, correlations with chemical and habitat indicators of stream disturbance, redundancy with other metrics, and within-year variability. Metrics that performed well were compared with metrics currently being used by three states in the region: Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. Some of the metrics used by these states did not perform well when evaluated using regional data, while other metrics used by all three states in some form, specifically number of taxa, number of EPT taxa, and Hilsenhoff Biotic Index, performed well overall. Reasons for discrepancies between state and regional evaluations of metrics are explored. We also provide a set of metrics that, when used in combination, may provide a useful assessment of stream conditions in the MAHR.

[1]  John L. Stoddard,et al.  The Relationship Between Stream Chemistry and Watershed Land Cover Data in the Mid-Atlantic Region, U.S. , 1998 .

[2]  D. Carlisle,et al.  Sensitivity and variability of metrics used in biological assessments of running waters , 1999 .

[3]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[4]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[5]  M. Barbour,et al.  A Framework for Biological Criteria for Florida Streams Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[6]  W. Brumbaugh,et al.  Relations between Benthic Community Structure and Metals Concentrations in Aquatic Macroinvertebrates: Clark Fork River, Montana , 1995 .

[7]  A. Herlihy,et al.  Stream chemistry in the eastern United States. 2. Current sources of acidity in acidic and low acid-neutralizing capacity streams , 1991 .

[8]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing Invertebrate Responses to Human Activities: Evaluating Alternative Approaches , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Comparing strengths of geographic and nongeographic classifications of stream benthic macroinvertebrates in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands, USA , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  K. Cummins,et al.  An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America , 1981 .

[11]  Matt R. Whiles,et al.  Biotic Indices and Stream Ecosystem Processes: Results from an Experimental Study , 1996 .

[12]  J. Meyer Stream Health: Incorporating the Human Dimension to Advance Stream Ecology , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[13]  J. Karr Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  Michael T. Barbour,et al.  Evaluation of EPA's rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: Metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites , 1992 .

[15]  V. Resh,et al.  Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. , 1975, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[16]  David R. Lenat,et al.  A Biotic Index for the Southeastern United States: Derivation and List of Tolerance Values, with Criteria for Assigning Water-Quality Ratings , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[17]  J. Karr Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities , 1981 .

[18]  M. Barbour,et al.  Assessment framework for mid-Atlantic coastal plain streams using benthic macroinvertebrates , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  James R. Karr,et al.  Defining and assessing ecological integrity: Beyond water quality , 1993 .

[20]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[21]  The statistical power of selected indicator metrics using macroinvertebrates for assessing acidification and eutrophication of running waters , 2000 .

[22]  W. Hilsenhoff,et al.  An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution , 2017, The Great Lakes Entomologist.

[23]  T. Reynoldson,et al.  The Reference Condition: A Comparison of Multimetric and Multivariate Approaches to Assess Water-Quality Impairment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[24]  James R. Karr,et al.  Biological monitoring: Essential foundation for ecological risk assessment , 1997 .

[25]  J. Gerritsen,et al.  Additive Biological Indices for Resource Management , 1995, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[26]  J. R. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters , 1998 .

[27]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes , 1993 .

[28]  I. Polls,et al.  How People in the Regulated Community View Biological Integrity , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[29]  Steven G. Paulsen,et al.  Designing a Spatially Balanced, Randomized Site Selection Process for Regional Stream Surveys: The EMAP Mid-Atlantic Pilot Study , 2000 .

[30]  Macroinvertebrate functional feeding group methods in ecological assessment , 2000 .

[31]  Wayne S. Davis,et al.  Biological assessment and criteria : tools for water resource planning and decision making , 1995 .

[32]  A. N. Strahler Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[33]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .