Challenges for technology diffusion policy to achieve socio-economic goals

Abstract The aim of this contribution is to analyze the challenges for technology diffusion policies to achieve expected socio-economic goals and to deduce conclusions for an adequate policy design. Based on hypotheses from theoretical contributions, we review two rather distinct technology fields. One is biobased products, the other health technologies with bioethanol and magnetic resonance imaging respectively as case studies in order to derive rather general insights regarding those policies. The case studies highlight the difficulties in achieving the aimed societal goals by promoting technology diffusion. The dominant innovation design (e.g. techniques or resources used) which diffuses or its application fields (e.g. indication, patient characteristics) differ from those assumed in impact assessments and side-effects which occur in other markets. The direct linkage of policy measures to societal criteria may avoid some of those undesired developments but may have side effects of their own, such as trade distortions or shifting the environmental burden to other activities. However, there is considerable scope for improvement in policy design compared to the status-quo. Overall, a more balanced policy mix regarding various socio-economic goals is vital and unintended side effects have to be considered more in decision making.

[1]  R. Diaz‐Chavez.  Assessing biofuels: Aiming for sustainable development or complying with the market? , 2011 .

[2]  R. Chou,et al.  Appropriate use of diagnostic imaging in low back pain: a reminder that unnecessary imaging may do as much harm as good. , 2011, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[3]  G. Timilsina,et al.  Biofuels: Markets, Targets and Impacts , 2010 .

[4]  Sami Mahroum.  Innovation Policies and Socio-Economic Goals: An Analytic-Diagnostic Framework , 2012 .

[5]  F. Erixon.  THE RISING TREND OF GREEN PROTECTIONISM: Biofuels and the European Union , 2012 .

[6]  R. V. Schomberg.  A vision of Responsible Innovation , 2013 .

[7]  Joy S. Clancy,et al.  Multiple objectives in biofuels sustainability policy , 2011 .

[8]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  How to ensure greenhouse gas emission reductions by increasing the use of biofuels?: Suitability of the European Union sustainability criteria , 2011 .

[9]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Key issues in the institutionalization of technology assessment: Development of technology assessment in five European countries and the USA , 1988 .

[10]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[11]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications , 2015 .

[12]  R. Busse,et al.  Performance of reimbursement schemes in valuation of technologies: the example of magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[13]  Jim C Philp,et al.  Biofuels development and the policy regime. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  L. Baker.  Acquisition of MRI equipment by doctors drives up imaging use and spending. , 2010, Health affairs.

[15]  Catherine Lyall,et al.  Governing Genomics: New Governance Tools for New Technologies? , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[16]  M. Mclaughlin.  Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation , 1987 .

[17]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[18]  van Qc Rinie Est,et al.  The Practice of TA; Science, Interaction, and Communication , 2004 .

[19]  David W Lee,et al.  The sharp slowdown in growth of medical imaging: an early analysis suggests combination of policies was the cause. , 2012, Health affairs.

[20]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Linking reductionist science and holistic policy using systematic reviews: unpacking environmental policy questions to construct an evidence-based framework. , 2009 .

[21]  Nicolae Scarlat,et al.  Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview , 2011 .

[22]  L. Baker,et al.  The relationship between technology availability and health care spending. , 2003, Health affairs.

[23]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  How effective are the sustainability criteria accompanying the European Union 2020 biofuel targets? , 2013 .

[24]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems : a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars , 2011 .

[25]  F. V. Stappen,et al.  Direct and indirect land use changes issues in European sustainability initiatives: State-of-the-art, open issues and future developments , 2011 .

[26]  Leo Jansen,et al.  Sustainable Technology Development , 2000 .

[27]  Scott W Atlas,et al.  Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value. , 2008, Health affairs.

[28]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[29]  Rainer Quitzow,et al.  Towards a strategic framework for promoting environmental innovations , 2012 .

[30]  Amelia Sharman,et al.  Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence gathering? Biofuels, the EU and the 10% target† , 2010 .

[31]  E. Hizsnyik,et al.  Biofuels and Food Security: Implications of an Accelerated Biofuels Production , 2009 .

[32]  J. Skinner,et al.  Technology Growth and Expenditure Growth in Health Care , 2011, National Bureau of Economic Research bulletin on aging and health.

[33]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  Enhancing innovation in agriculture at the policy level: The potential contribution of Technology Assessment , 2013 .

[34]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies , 2011 .

[35]  Alan Swinbank.  EU Support for Biofuels and Bioenergy, Environmental Sustainability Criteria, and Trade Policy , 2009 .

[36]  M. Drummond,et al.  Another special relationship? Interactions between health technology policies and health care systems in the United States and the United Kingdom. , 2011, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[37]  R. Perrin,et al.  Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science , 2009 .

[38]  Wallace E. Tyner,et al.  Biofuels for all? Understanding the Global Impacts of Multinational Mandates , 2008, GTAP Working Paper.

[39]  David Salonen,et al.  The challenge of early diagnosis in ankylosing spondylitis. , 2007, The Journal of rheumatology.

[40]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. , 2008, Health affairs.

[41]  L. Goulder,et al.  Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[42]  R. Est,et al.  Getting to the core of the bio-economy : a perspective on the sustainable promise of biomass , 2011 .

[43]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth: Linking Policy Research and Practice in "STIG Systems" , 2009 .

[44]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development , 2011 .