The effect of pre-milking teat-brushing on milk processing time in an automated milking system

Cow throughput in an automatic milking system (AMS) is limited by system parameters such as the time required for pre-milking udder preparation and cup attachment, physiological responses of the cow (such as milk let-down and milking-out rate), milking machine features and cow behaviour. A single-factor cross-over design was used to investigate the effect of pre-milking teat brushing on milk processing time in an AMS operating in an extensive grazing farming system. Teat brushing consisted of two roller brushes tracking up each teat three times (total brushing time of up to 45 s/cow). Cows were allocated to one of two treatment groups with either no brushing (NB) or brushing (B) for a 4-week period before being changed to the other treatment. Teat brushing resulted in shorter average cups-on-time (B=506·1 s, NB=541·0 s, P=0·0001), longer average milk processing time (B=10·30 min, NB=9·76 min, P=0·001) and no difference in daily milk yield (B=14·67, NB=14·71 kg/cow, P=0·826). There was no difference between the two treatments in the success of cup attachment (B=3·76%, NB=5·10% unsuccessful milking attempts, P=0·285). The estimated time cost of pre-milking teat brushing was 53 min for every 100 milkings, equivalent to an additional 5–6 milkings for every 100 milkings by an AMS. The importance of these potential time savings is discussed in relation to automatic milking in farming systems that aim for a lower per cow milking frequency and high ratio of cows to AMS.

[1]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Oxytocin release, milk ejection and milking characteristics in a single stall automatic milking system , 2004 .

[2]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Stimulation of milk ejection: a basic need or just a time-consuming routine , 2004 .

[3]  Jago Jg,et al.  Remote automatic selection of cows for milking in a pasture-based automatic milking system , 2004 .

[4]  K. Bright,et al.  Automatic dairy farming in New Zealand using extensive grazing systems. , 2004 .

[5]  K. Bright,et al.  An innovative farm system combining automated milking with grazing , 2002 .

[6]  J. Jago,et al.  Automatic Milking Systems: an option to address the labour shortage on New Zealand dairy farms? , 2002 .

[7]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Specific aspects of milk ejection in robotic milking: a review , 2001 .

[8]  B. Harris,et al.  Review of Holsteinization on Intensive Pastoral Dairy Farming in New Zealand , 2001 .

[9]  L. D. Muller,et al.  A comparison of New Zealand and overseas Holstein Friesian heifers. , 2000 .

[10]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Analysis of milking behaviour on automatic milking. , 2000 .

[11]  T. Mottram,et al.  Effect of food type and location on the attendance to an automatic milking system by daily cows and the effect of feeding during milking on their behaviour and milking characteristics , 1998 .

[12]  D. Schams,et al.  Continuously elevated concentrations of oxytocin during milking are necessary for complete milk removal in dairy cows , 1994, Journal of Dairy Research.

[13]  M. Rasmussen,et al.  The Influence of Premilking Teat Preparation and Attachment Delay on Milk Yield and Milking Performance , 1992 .

[14]  N. E. Jensen,et al.  Comparison of a Standardized and Variable Milking Routine , 1990 .

[15]  H. Erb,et al.  Effects of premilking stimulation on complete lactation milk yield and milking performance. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  D. Phillips Studies on pre-milking preparation 8. A comparison of 10 and 45 seconds of wash and stimulus , 1986 .