A protocol for rheological characterization of hydrogels for tissue engineering strategies.

Hydrogels are studied extensively for many tissue engineering applications, and their mechanical properties influence both cellular and tissue compatibility. However, it is difficult to compare the mechanical properties of hydrogels between studies due to a lack of continuity between rheological protocols. This study outlines a straightforward protocol to accurately determine hydrogel equilibrium modulus and gelation time using a series of rheological tests. These protocols are applied to several hydrogel systems used within tissue engineering applications: agarose, collagen, fibrin, Matrigel™, and methylcellulose. The protocol is outlined in four steps: (1) Time sweep to determine the gelation time of the hydrogel. (2) Strain sweep to determine the linear-viscoelastic region of the hydrogel with respect to strain. (3) Frequency sweep to determine the linear equilibrium modulus plateau of the hydrogel. (4) Time sweep with values obtained from strain and frequency sweeps to accurately report the equilibrium moduli and gelation time. Finally, the rheological characterization protocol was evaluated using a composite Matrigel™-methylcellulose hydrogel blend whose mechanical properties were previously unknown. The protocol described herein provides a standardized approach for proper analysis of hydrogel rheological properties.

[1]  S. Van Vlierberghe,et al.  Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[2]  Antonios G Mikos,et al.  Evaluation of the in vitro degradation of macroporous hydrogels using gravimetry, confined compression testing, and microcomputed tomography. , 2002, Biomacromolecules.

[3]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells ‘feel’ outside and in? , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[5]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Characterisation of the interactive properties of microcrystalline cellulose-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels. , 2011, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[6]  Wim E. Hennink,et al.  Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels , 2002 .

[7]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[8]  Dong-An Wang,et al.  Therapeutic cell delivery and fate control in hydrogels and hydrogel hybrids. , 2010, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[9]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[10]  A. Lowman,et al.  Superporous hydrogels for cartilage repair: Evaluation of the morphological and mechanical properties. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Shelly R Peyton,et al.  The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-D biosynthetic hydrogel system. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[12]  D. Pochan,et al.  Rheological properties of peptide-based hydrogels for biomedical and other applications. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[13]  H. Winter,et al.  Rheology of model polyurethanes at the gel point , 1986 .

[14]  H. Winter,et al.  Linear Viscoelasticity at the Gel Point of a Crosslinking PDMS with Imbalanced Stoichiometry , 1987 .

[15]  Michael S Detamore,et al.  Hierarchically designed agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) interpenetrating network hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[16]  Mehrdad Hamidi,et al.  Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[17]  R. Gilbert,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of tunable polysaccharide hydrogel blends for neural repair. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[18]  Jess G Snedeker,et al.  Biochemical and biomechanical gradients for directed bone marrow stromal cell differentiation toward tendon and bone. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[19]  R. Bird.  Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids , 1977 .

[20]  R V Bellamkonda,et al.  Agarose gel stiffness determines rate of DRG neurite extension in 3D cultures. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[21]  S. Ross‐Murphy,et al.  Polysaccharide strong and weak gels. , 1993, Biorheology.

[22]  Simon B. Ross-Murphy,et al.  Rheology of Biopolymer Solutions and Gels , 2003, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[23]  J. Ferry.  Viscoelastic properties of polymers , 1961 .

[24]  Z. Guan,et al.  De novo design of saccharide-peptide hydrogels as synthetic scaffolds for tailored cell responses. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  P. Choong,et al.  A chitosan hydrogel delivery system for osteosarcoma gene therapy with pigment epithelium-derived factor combined with chemotherapy. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[26]  H. Henning Winter,et al.  Analysis of Linear Viscoelasticity of a Crosslinking Polymer at the Gel Point , 1986 .

[27]  J. Mcdonald,et al.  Controlled release of neurotrophin-3 from fibrin gels for spinal cord injury. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.