Importance of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE To determine which aspects of vision most influence the ability of patients with glaucoma to function. METHODS A total of 192 patients with a full range of glaucomatous visual loss were selected from the Glaucoma Service of Wills Eye Institute. Patients were evaluated clinically with standard visual assessments: visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field, stereopsis, the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, and intraocular pressure. Patients were evaluated objectively using a comprehensive performance-based measure of visual function, the Assessment of Disability Related to Vision (ADREV), and subjectively with the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Statistical analyses, including Spearman correlation coefficients and regression analysis, were performed on the data. RESULTS Performance on the ADREV was most strongly associated with binocular visual acuity (r = -0.79; P < .001) and binocular contrast sensitivity (r = 0.80; P < .001). Monocular and binocular visual field test results correlated well with the ability to perform the ADREV tasks, but there was a significantly weaker association (P < .05) compared with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. CONCLUSION The aspects of visual function that best predict the ability of a patient with glaucoma to perform activities of daily living are binocular visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

[1]  George L Spaeth,et al.  Systems for staging the amount of optic nerve damage in glaucoma: a critical review and new material. , 2006, Survey of ophthalmology.

[2]  G. Spaeth,et al.  The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. , 2002, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[3]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  G S Rubin,et al.  Assessing functional status: correlation between performance on tasks conducted in a clinic setting and performance on the same task conducted at home. The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[5]  J Caprioli,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma. , 1994, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[6]  S. Haymes,et al.  Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  E F Cook,et al.  Development of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale: A Measure of Visual Functional Status , 1992, Medical care.

[8]  A J Bron,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. , 1984, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Douglas Hoffman,et al.  Comparison of methods to predict visual field progression in glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  Beatriz Munoz,et al.  Glaucoma and reading speed: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation project. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  R. P. Mills,et al.  Correlation of Visual Field With Quality-of-Life Measures at Diagnosis in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) , 2001, Journal of glaucoma.

[12]  Jonghyeon Kim,et al.  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 14. Distinguishing progression of glaucoma from visual field fluctuations. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Hultgren,et al.  The impact of glaucoma on the quality of life of patients in Norway. II. Patient response correlated to objective data. , 2001, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[14]  A New Method of Assessing Ability to Perform Activities of Daily Living: Design, Methods and Baseline Data , 2007, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[15]  B. Munoz,et al.  Glaucoma and mobility performance: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[16]  L. A. Chiasson,et al.  Glaucoma and on-road driving performance. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  C. O'brien,et al.  Quality of Life in Glaucoma and Its Relationship with Visual Function , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[18]  Gary C. Brown,et al.  Quality of life associated with visual loss: a time tradeoff utility analysis comparison with medical health states. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[19]  David P. Crabb,et al.  Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[20]  Paul R Duberstein,et al.  Personality is associated with perceived health and functional status in older primary care patients. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[21]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Relationships in Glaucoma Patients Between Standard Vision Tests, Quality of Life, and Ability to Perform Daily Activities , 2010, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[22]  William J Feuer,et al.  Impact of visual function on computer task accuracy and reaction time in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  L T Chylack,et al.  Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II) , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Clinical Decisions In Glaucoma , 1993 .

[25]  J. Keeffe,et al.  Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living , 2003, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[26]  M. Iester,et al.  Quality of life in patients with early, moderate and advanced glaucoma , 2002, Eye.

[27]  F. Horn,et al.  Temporal contrast sensitivity with peripheral and central stimulation in glaucoma diagnosis , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  C. Owsley,et al.  Depression and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in older adults. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[29]  L. Sakata,et al.  Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis , 2007, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[30]  Paul Harasymowycz,et al.  Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  H. Jampel,et al.  Glaucoma Patients' Assessment of Their Visual Function and Quality of Life , 2002, Journal of glaucoma.

[32]  W. Feuer,et al.  Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[33]  K. Turano,et al.  Mobility performance in glaucoma. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  I L Bailey,et al.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race. Seven-year results. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[36]  Roberta McKean-Cowdin,et al.  Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[37]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001 .

[38]  A W Johnston,et al.  The development of the Melbourne low-vision ADL index: a measure of vision disability. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  J. Myers.  Impact of Visual Field Loss on Health-Related Quality of Life in Glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study , 2009 .

[40]  R. P. Mills,et al.  Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[41]  E. E. Hartmann,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[42]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Assessment of Function Related to Vision (AFREV) , 2006, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[43]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. , 1999, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[44]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .