Scenarios as a Tool for Eliciting and Understanding Farmers’ Biological Knowledge

Modern scientific knowledge and indigenous or traditionally based knowledge are often assumed to be fundamentally different and incomparable. Testing this assumption is important theoretically and for supporting scientist-farmer collaboration to improve farmers’ well-being in their own terms. We illustrate the use of scenarios based on a basic biological model to understand farmers’ theoretical biological knowledge. Scenarios depict aspects of the model in terms comprehensible to farmers and relevant to collaboration with scientific plant breeders. Results suggest that scenarios are useful for eliciting traditionally based biological knowledge and that farmers’ theoretical biological knowledge is based on the same model as that of scientists.

[1]  D. Cleveland.  Is plant breeding science objective truth or social construction? The case of yield stability , 2001 .

[2]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Understanding farmers' knowledge as the basis for collaboration with plant breeders: methodological development and examples from ongoing research in Mexico, Syria, Cuba and Nepal. , 2002 .

[3]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[4]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World , 2003, Conservation Biology.

[5]  R. Costanza,et al.  Visions, Values, Valuation, and the Need for an Ecological Economics , 2001 .

[6]  S. Smith,et al.  Evaluating the potential for farmer and plant breeder collaboration: A case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2000, Euphytica.

[7]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Plant breeding with farmers requires testing the assumptions of conventional plant breeding: lessons from the ICARDA barley program. , 2002 .

[8]  R. Downey.  Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants , 2003 .

[9]  B. B. Walters.  Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and Its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives. , 2003 .

[10]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice , 2002 .

[11]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Science without laws , 1999 .

[12]  N. W. Simmonds,et al.  Principles of crop improvement , 1979 .

[13]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[14]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Farmer Selection and Conservation of Crop Varieties , 2004 .

[15]  M. Smale,et al.  Farmers' Use of Improved Seed Selection Practices in Mexican Maize: Evidence and Issues from the Sierra de Santa Marta , 1998 .

[16]  R. Ellen,et al.  Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations : critical anthropological perspectives , 2001 .

[17]  Ian D. Pulford,et al.  Indigenous and scientific knowledge: the choice and management of cultivation sites by bedouin in Upper Egypt , 1998 .

[18]  L. Sperling,et al.  Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding-from the perspective of formal plant breeding: A global analysis of issues, results, and current experience , 2003 .

[19]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[20]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Indigenous and scientific knowledge of plant breeding: Similarities, differences and implications for collaboration , 2002 .

[21]  A. Agrawal.  Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge , 1995 .

[22]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Introduction: Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Knowledge, Practice and the Possibilities for Collaboration , 2002 .

[23]  A. Agrawal.  Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives . Edited by Roy Ellen, Peter Parkes, and Alan Bicker. Reading, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers, xii, 356 pp. $60.00 (cloth); $25.00 (paper). , 2001, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[24]  Xuewen Lu,et al.  Genotype × Region Interaction for Two-Row Barley Yield in Canada , 2000 .

[25]  P. Sillitoe.  Knowing the land: soil and land resource evaluation and indigenous knowledge , 1998 .

[26]  S. Smith,et al.  Rapid estimation of broad sense heritability of farmer-managed maize populations in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico, and implications for improvement , 2002, Euphytica.

[27]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[28]  Scenarios in anthropology: reflections on possible futures of the Suriname Maroons , 2003 .

[29]  S. McGuire,et al.  Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding-done from a perspective of farmer plant breeding : a global analysis of issues and of current experience , 2003 .

[30]  P. Sillitoe,et al.  Participating in development : approaches to indigenous knowledge. , 2002 .

[31]  M. Mayo.  Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants. The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation. Washington DC: National Academy Press (2002), pp. 320, £30.95. ISBN 0-309-08263-3 , 2003, Experimental Agriculture.

[32]  D. Hull,et al.  Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .

[33]  D. Hendrick,et al.  Introduction , 1998, Thorax.