Betit: A Family that Nests Probit and Logit

This paper proposes a dichotomous choice model that is based on a transformed beta (or "z") distribution. This model, called betit, nests both logit and probit and allows for various skewed and peaked disturbance densities. Because the shape of this density affects the estimated relation between the dichotomous choice variable and its determinants, the greater flexibility of the transformed beta distribution is useful in generating more accurate representations of this relationship. The paper considers asymptotic biases of the logit and probit models under conditions where betit should have been used. It also investigates small sample power and provides two examples of applications that illustrative of the capability of the betit model.

[1]  G. Brunello.  Absolute Risk Aversion and the Returns to Education , 2001 .

[2]  C. Grund.  Wages as Risk Compensation in Germany , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Rainer Winkelmann,et al.  Dutch Migrants in New Zealand: Did They Fare Well? , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Jeff Frank,et al.  Temporary Jobs: Stepping Stones or Dead Ends? , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  G. Wagner,et al.  A forgotten issue: Distributional effects of day care subsidies in Germany , 2000, Social Science Research Network.

[6]  Patrick Francois,et al.  Gender Wage Differentials in a Competitive Labor Market: The Household Interaction Effect , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Horst Entorf,et al.  Rational Migration Policy Should Tolerate Non-Zero Illegal Migration Flows: Lessons from Modelling the Market for Illegal Migration , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  C. Schmidt.  Arbeitsmarktpolitische Maßnahmen Und Ihre Evaluierung: Eine Bestandsaufnahme , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Wim P. M. Vijverberg,et al.  Monte Carlo evaluation of multivariate normal probabilities , 1997 .

[10]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[11]  W. Vijverberg,et al.  Comparing earnings profiles in urban areas of an LDC: rural-to-urban migrants vs. native workers. , 1994, Journal of development economics.

[12]  R. Spady,et al.  AN EFFICIENT SEMIPARAMETRIC ESTIMATOR FOR BINARY RESPONSE MODELS , 1993 .

[13]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. , 1992 .

[14]  K. B. Oldham,et al.  An Atlas of Functions. , 1988 .

[15]  T. Mroz,et al.  The Sensitivity of an Empirical Model of Married Women's Hours of Work to Economic and Statistical Assumptions , 1987 .

[16]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[17]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Specification Error in Probit Models , 1985 .

[18]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  Testing the Normality Assumption in Limited Dependent Variable Models , 1984 .

[19]  Arthur S. Goldberger,et al.  ABNORMAL SELECTION BIAS , 1983 .

[20]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Normal Variance-Mean Mixtures and z Distributions , 1982 .

[21]  P. Schmidt,et al.  An Investigation of the Robustness of the Tobit Estimator to Non-Normality , 1982 .

[22]  P. Robinson,et al.  ON THE ASYMPTOTIC PROPERTIES OF ESTIMATORS OF MODELS CONTAINING LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLES , 1982 .

[23]  H. White.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .

[24]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Further evidence on the robustness of the Tobit estimator to heteroskedasticity , 1981 .

[25]  T. Amemiya.  QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[26]  R. Sabot,et al.  Economic Development and Urban Migration: Tanzania 1900-1971. , 1981 .

[27]  M. Hurd.  Estimation in truncated samples when there is heteroscedasticity , 1979 .

[28]  R. Prentice,et al.  A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose response curves. , 1976, Biometrics.

[29]  Ross L. Prentice,et al.  Discrimination among some parametric models , 1975 .

[30]  R. Prentice.  A LOG GAMMA MODEL AND ITS MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION , 1974 .

[31]  J. K. Ord,et al.  Families of frequency distributions , 1973 .

[32]  D. Cox,et al.  Discrimination between alternative binary response models. , 1967, Biometrika.

[33]  D. E. Barton,et al.  The conditions under which Gram-Charlier and Edgeworth curves are positive definite and unimodal , 1952 .

[34]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[35]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  123: The Mathematical Distributions Used in the Common Tests of Significance. , 1935 .

[36]  R. Fisher.  014: On the "Probable Error" of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample. , 1921 .